Literature DB >> 3666560

Electrodes for 24 hours pH monitoring--a comparative study.

G McLauchlan1, J M Rawlings, M L Lucas, R F McCloy, G P Crean, K E McColl.   

Abstract

Three pH electrodes in clinical use were examined--(1) antimony electrode with remote reference electrode (Synectics 0011), (2) glass electrode with remote reference electrode (Microelectrodes Inc. MI 506) and (3) combined glass electrode with integral reference electrode (Radiometer GK2801C). In vitro studies showed that both glass electrodes were similar and superior to the antimony electrode with respect to response time, drift, and sensitivity. The effect of the siting of the reference electrode on the recorded pH was examined in five human volunteers. The pH reading using a remote skin reference electrode was higher by a mean of 0.3 pH units (range 0.0-0.6) in the stomach, lower by 0.65 pH units (0.5-0.8) in the duodenum and lower by 0.3 pH units (0.0-0.6) in the oesophagus than that simultaneously obtained with an intraluminal reference electrode. Buccal reference electrodes gave similar readings to skin. Combined reference and glass pH electrodes are recommended for 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3666560      PMCID: PMC1433138          DOI: 10.1136/gut.28.8.935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  8 in total

1.  Continuously recorded pH of gastric and duodenal contents in situ with an evaluation of the efficacy of some antacids in vivo.

Authors:  J TOMENIUS; G WILLIAMS
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1960-01-25

2.  A METHOD FOR THE CONTINUOUS RECORDING OF GASTRIC pH IN SITU.

Authors:  J Flexner; M Kniazuk; J Nyboer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1939-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Factors influencing the continuous recording of in situ pH of gastric and duodenal contents.

Authors:  R A ROVELSTAD; C A OWEN; T B MAGATH
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1952-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Improved antimony--antimony (III) oxide pH electrodes.

Authors:  G Edwall
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Profile of pH, pressure, and potential difference at gastroduodenal junction in man.

Authors:  S Andersson; M I Grossman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  On the use of monocrystalline antimony pH electrodes in gastro-oesophageal functional disorders.

Authors:  P Ask; G Edwall; K E Johansson; L Tibbling
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  In situ pH of duodenal bulb contents in normal and duodenal ulcer subjects.

Authors:  A P Archambault; R A Rovelstad; H C Carlson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The role of intraluminal junction potentials in the generation of the gastric potential difference in man.

Authors:  N W Read; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 22.682

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino; M Moretti; A Sumberaz; G Bonifacino; P Zentilin; E Caputo; G Villa; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) pH electrode: a new sensor for long term ambulatory pH monitoring.

Authors:  P Duroux; C Emde; P Bauerfeind; C Francis; A Grisel; L Thybaud; D Arstrong; C Depeursinge; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Comparative study of glass and antimony electrodes for continuous oesophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; R Helven; H Goyvaerts
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Variations in results of simultaneous ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  F J Hampton; U M MacFadyen; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  A novel placement method of the Bravo wireless pH monitoring capsule for measuring intragastric pH.

Authors:  Jae Hyuck Chang; Myung Gyu Choi; Dong-Seok Yim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Park; In Seok Lee; Sang Woo Kim; In Sik Chung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Antimony electrodes.

Authors:  J M Rawlings
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Ambulatory esophageal pHmetry in healthy dogs with and without the influence of general anesthesia.

Authors:  Evandro Silva Favarato; Maria Verônica de Souza; Paulo Renato dos Santos Costa; Luiz Gonzaga Pompermayer; Lukiya Silva Campos Favarato; José Ivo Ribeiro Júnior
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 8.  The interpretation of oesophageal pH monitoring data.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; H Loeb
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Continuous oesophageal pH-monitoring.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Intragastric and intraoesophageal pH monitoring in duodenal ulcerpatients: effect of the new histamine H2-receptor antagonist ramixotidine.

Authors:  M Molgora; G Basilisco; A Bozzani; G Camboni; P A Bianchi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.