Literature DB >> 2253532

Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.

G S Mela1, V Savarino, M Moretti, A Sumberaz, G Bonifacino, P Zentilin, E Caputo, G Villa, G Celle.   

Abstract

Antimony and glass pH electrodes show almost identical experimental errors in continuously measuring buffer solutions at constant temperature over 24 hr. These errors are lower than the nominal quantization error of the instruments and are not properly described by the 24-hr drift determination. The addition of food particles to the solutions can induce severe reading artifacts. The longer response time reported in vitro of antimony electrodes when moving from pH 1 to pH 7 (3.4 sec vs 0.8 sec with glass electrodes) is irrelevant during in vivo pH-metry studies, because we found that the greatest absolute difference between raw fast acquired (4-6 sec) consecutive pH readings of two commonly used devices was 0.7 pH units in circadian profiles obtained from 413 subjects with various clinical conditions. In our in vivo studies, gastric acidity was monitored continuously with two side-by-side minielectrodes, which were variously combined (antimony-glass, A-G; antimony-antimony A1-A2; glass-glass, G1-G2) and applied on groups of 27 subjects matched for clinical condition. The 24-hr pH means and the 24-hr [H+] means calculated from the acidity profiles obtained with the three electrode combinations, lie on the identity line in each group. Using the Bland-Altman technique for assessing measurement agreement, the differences between the 24-hr pH means and the 24-hr [H+] means obtained with the three combined systems are similar (P = .903 and P = 0.824, respectively) and their 95% confidence limits are comprised within the range (+/-) of the reading error of the measuring systems (namely, +/- 0.3 pH units and +/- 12 mmol/liter in terms of [H+]).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2253532     DOI: 10.1007/bf01540564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  19 in total

1.  Clinical relevance of sampling rate in the characterization and analysis of 24-hour gastric acidity. A report on 413 cases.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino; M Moretti; G Bonifacino; A Sumberaz; P Zentilin
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Gastric aspiration versus antimony and glass pH electrodes. A simultaneous comparative in vivo study.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; M R Magnolia; P Scalabrini; F Valle; M Moretti; G Bonifacino; G Celle
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  24-hour study of intragastric acidity in duodenal ulcer patients and normal subjects using continuous intraluminal pH-metry.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Scalabrini; A Sumberaz; G Fera; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Determination of pH by the glass electrode: pH meter calibration for gastric analysis.

Authors:  E W Moore
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Lessons from prolonged gastric pH monitoring.

Authors:  R Bumm; A L Blum; P Bauerfeind; C Emde
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Evaluation of antisecretory activity of misoprostol in duodenal ulcer patients using long-term intragastric pH monitoring.

Authors:  V Savarino; P Scalabrini; G S Mela; E di Timoteo; G Percario; M R Magnolia; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Does smoking interfere with the effect of histamine H2-receptor antagonists on intragastric acidity in man?

Authors:  P Bauerfeind; T Cilluffo; C J Fimmel; C Emde; C von Ritter; W Kohler; R Gugler; T Gasser; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Continuous 24 hour intragastric pH monitoring: focus on reproducibility in duodenal ulcer patients. A preliminary report.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Scalabrini; M R Magnolia; E Di Timoteo; G Percario; G Celle
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1986-12

10.  Pattern of 24 hour intragastric acidity in active duodenal ulcer disease and in healthy controls.

Authors:  H S Merki; C J Fimmel; R P Walt; K Harre; J Röhmel; L Witzel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mealtime versus nighttime acid inhibition. A clinical pharmacological study with ranitidine.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; S Vigneri; P Cutela; R Mele; F Di Mario
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  New method for improving accuracy of 24-hour continuous intragastric pH-metry. Reflections on physiological and pharmacological studies.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino; A Malesci; F Di Mario; P Sossai; S Vigneri; A Zambotti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Circadian gastric acidity in Helicobacter pylori positive ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia in the duodenum.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; M R Mele; L Lapertosa; R Patetta; E Dallorto; A Vassallo; C Mansi; S Vigneri; G Celle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Antisecretory effects of three omeprazole regimens for maintenance treatment in duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; P Cutela; M R Mele; D Perilli; A Vassallo; A Zambotti; C Mansi; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Post-test calibration of single-use, antimony, 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH probes is necessary.

Authors:  James L Wise; Patricia K Kammer; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Variability in individual response to various doses of omeprazole. Implications for antiulcer therapy.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; P Cutela; M R Mele; S Vigneri; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.