Literature DB >> 437420

The role of intraluminal junction potentials in the generation of the gastric potential difference in man.

N W Read, J S Fordtran.   

Abstract

Using flowing isotonic NaCl or flowing molar KCl electrodes, the magnitude of liquid junction potentials between the electrode tip and gastric juice was measured directly, and calculated from electrolyte concentrations in gastric juice according to standard formulas. Gastric transepithelial potential difference was obtained by subtracting the junction potential from the measured gastric potential difference. Junction potentials by direct experiment correlated closely with calculated values. The magnitude of the junction potential was shown to depend on the level of gastric acidity as well as on the nature of the flowing intraluminal electrode. However, transepithelial potential difference was always the same with the two electrode solutions. It is impossible to measure junction potentials with an intraluminal KCl agar electrode, but they must exist because these electrodes did not accurately measure transepithelial potential difference when gastric acidity was high. Pentagastrin caused a transient decline in transepithelial potential difference; this was not observed in patients with pernicious anemia. We conclude that accurate measurement of transepithelial potential difference must include correction for liquid junction potentials, which are sizable when gastric acidity is high. This can best be done with a flowing intraluminal electrode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 437420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  21 in total

1.  Effect of acid perfusion on passive electrophysiological properties of rabbit esophagus in vivo.

Authors:  Ingemar Jacobson; Nadereh Poorkhalkali; Ann-Cathrine Jönsson-Rylander; Roy C Orlando
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Abnormal passive chloride absorption in cystic fibrosis jejunum functionally opposes the classic chloride secretory defect.

Authors:  Michael A Russo; Christoph Hogenauer; Stephen W Coates; Carol A Santa Ana; Jack L Porter; Randall L Rosenblatt; Michael Emmett; John S Fordtran
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Placebo-controlled comparison of piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin, piroxicam, and indomethacin on gastric potential difference and mucosal injury in humans.

Authors:  L Santucci; S Fiorucci; S Chiucchiù; A Sicilia; L Bufalino; A Morelli
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Comparative study of glass and antimony electrodes for continuous oesophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; R Helven; H Goyvaerts
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Gastroduodenal mucosal surface and luminal pH in gastric ulcer.

Authors:  J W Rawlings; B J Danesh; M L Lucas; R J Morgan; A N Main; R I Russell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Discrepancies between effects of recombinant human growth hormone on absorption and secretion of water and electrolytes on the human jejunum compared to results reported on rat jejunum.

Authors:  C Högenauer; C A Santa Ana; J L Porter; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Electrodes for 24 hours pH monitoring--a comparative study.

Authors:  G McLauchlan; J M Rawlings; M L Lucas; R F McCloy; G P Crean; K E McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Esophageal transmural potential difference in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; B Adami
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1980-03-17

9.  The effect of cathartic agents on transmucosal electrical potential difference in the human rectum.

Authors:  K Ewe; R Wanitschke
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1980-03-17

10.  Transmucosal electrical resistance in rabbit isolated gastric mucosa during exposure to acid.

Authors:  G E Spencer; C F Spraggs; R Stables; B H Hirst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.