Literature DB >> 2916860

A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones. Implications for treatment.

J P Neoptolemos1, D E Shaw, D L Carr-Locke.   

Abstract

A multivariate analysis of 30 preoperative risk factors was undertaken in 248 patients who underwent surgery alone for common bile duct (CBD) stones and in 190 patients who had endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), 77 of whom subsequently also had surgery. Independently significant risk factors in those undergoing surgery were the serum bilirubin level, the use of preoperative ES, and the presence of medical risk factors; in patients undergoing ES, only the serum bilirubin and albumin, but not medical risk factors, were of independent significance. The major implications of this study are, first, that high-risk patients should be treated by ES without subsequent surgery, and second, that "fit patients should be treated by surgery alone without routine preoperative ES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2916860      PMCID: PMC1493909          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198902000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

1.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery.

Authors:  B R Davidson; J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Prediction of risk in biliary surgery.

Authors:  S L Blamey; K C Fearon; W H Gilmour; D H Osborne; D C Carter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges).

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Factors affecting morbidity and mortality after surgery for obstructive jaundice: a review of 373 patients.

Authors:  J M Dixon; C P Armstrong; S W Duffy; G C Davies
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Choledochoscopy in surgery for choledocholithiasis. Six year experience in 380 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J Escat; D L Glucksman; C Maigne; G Fourtanier; D Fournier; C Vaislic
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Early and late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary lithiasis with and without the gall bladder 'in situ'.

Authors:  J Escourrou; J A Cordova; F Lazorthes; J Frexinos; A Ribet
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Intraoperative biliary endoscopy.

Authors:  S K Kappes; M B Adams; S D Wilson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1982-05

8.  The value of choledochoscopy in exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; K L Mattox; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The management of common bile duct calculi by endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladders in situ.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke; I Fraser; D P Fossard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with gallbladders.

Authors:  P B Cotton; A G Vallon
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  20 in total

1.  Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; G Mentha; F Borst; L Buhler; B Roche; R Cywes; R Tibshirani; A Rohner; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Endoscopic removal of common duct stones: current indications and controversies.

Authors:  R C Horton; A Lauri; J S Dooley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care.

Authors:  J Werner; S Feuerbach; W Uhl; M W Büchler
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The fate of patients who undergo "preoperative" ERCP to clear known or suspected bile duct stones.

Authors:  M F Byrne; M T McLoughlin; R M Mitchell; H Gerke; T N Pappas; M S Branch; P S Jowell; J Baillie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Suspected biliary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy leading to endoscopic cholangiography: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  C F Gholson; C Dungan; G Neff; R Ferguson; D Favrot; I Nandy; P Banish; K Sittig
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the young patient: is there cause for concern?

Authors:  T C Tham; D L Carr-Locke; J S Collins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Chuan Jin Tan; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David J Martin; Gareth Kirk; Lloyd McKie; Tom Diamond; Mark A Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-12

8.  Does prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent recurrent biliary problems in patients with gallstones and a normal cholangiogram?

Authors:  S D Johnston; P Lim; J S A Collins; R G P Watson; T C K Tham
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  "Ultra-rapid" sequential treatment in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: alternative same-day approach to laparoendoscopic rendezvous.

Authors:  Dario Borreca; Alberto Bona; Maria Paola Bellomo; Andrea Borasi; Paolo De Paolis
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-12-11

10.  Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; O van Ruler; L M Dijksman; A A van Geloven; E G Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.