Literature DB >> 10892200

From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research.

G L Wells1, R S Malpass, R C Lindsay, R P Fisher, J W Turtle, S M Fulero.   

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Justice released the first national guide for collecting and preserving eyewitness evidence in October 1999. Scientific psychology played a large role in making a case for these procedural guidelines as well as in setting a scientific foundation for the guidelines, and eyewitness researchers directly participated in writing them. The authors describe how eyewitness researchers shaped understanding of eyewitness evidence issues over a long period of time through research and theory on system variables. Additional pressure for guidelines was applied by psychologists through expert testimony that focused on deficiencies in the procedures used to collect the eyewitness evidence. DNA exoneration cases were particularly important in leading U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno to notice the eyewitness literature in psychology and to order the National Institute of Justice to coordinate the development of national guidelines. The authors describe their experience as members of the working group, which included prosecutors, defense lawyers, and law enforcement officers from across the country.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10892200     DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.6.581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  12 in total

1.  Lineup identification by children: effects of clothing bias.

Authors:  Alejo Freire; Kang Lee; Karen S Williamson; Sarah J E Stuart; R C L Lindsay
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2004-06

2.  Whatever gave you that idea? False memories following equivalence training: a behavioral account of the misinformation effect.

Authors:  Danna M Challies; Maree Hunt; Maryanne Garry; David N Harper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; Nilli Lavie; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Ryan D Godfrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

5.  Judgments of others' heights are biased toward the height of the perceiver.

Authors:  Elyssa Twedt; L Elizabeth Crawford; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

6.  Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing.

Authors:  Ainat Pansky; Einat Tenenboim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

Review 7.  When more data steer us wrong: replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Evan Heit; Chad Dubé
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

8.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the activation and monitoring of memory errors.

Authors:  Jeannette Giammattei; Jason Arndt
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Bias in Rating of Rodent Distress during Anesthesia Induction for Anesthesia Compared with Euthanasia.

Authors:  Brittany A Baker; Debra L Hickman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  First all-in-one diagnostic tool for DNA intelligence: genome-wide inference of biogeographic ancestry, appearance, relatedness, and sex with the Identitas v1 Forensic Chip.

Authors:  Brendan Keating; Aruna T Bansal; Susan Walsh; Jonathan Millman; Jonathan Newman; Kenneth Kidd; Bruce Budowle; Arthur Eisenberg; Joseph Donfack; Paolo Gasparini; Zoran Budimlija; Anjali K Henders; Hareesh Chandrupatla; David L Duffy; Scott D Gordon; Pirro Hysi; Fan Liu; Sarah E Medland; Laurence Rubin; Nicholas G Martin; Timothy D Spector; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.