Literature DB >> 36264853

Validation of deep learning-based markerless 3D pose estimation.

Veronika Kosourikhina1, Diarmuid Kavanagh2,3, Michael J Richardson1,4, David M Kaplan1,4,5.   

Abstract

Deep learning-based approaches to markerless 3D pose estimation are being adopted by researchers in psychology and neuroscience at an unprecedented rate. Yet many of these tools remain unvalidated. Here, we report on the validation of one increasingly popular tool (DeepLabCut) against simultaneous measurements obtained from a reference measurement system (Fastrak) with well-known performance characteristics. Our results confirm close (mm range) agreement between the two, indicating that under specific circumstances deep learning-based approaches can match more traditional motion tracking methods. Although more work needs to be done to determine their specific performance characteristics and limitations, this study should help build confidence within the research community using these new tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264853      PMCID: PMC9584509          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  16 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  A protocol and calibration method for accurate multi-camera field videography.

Authors:  Diane H Theriault; Nathan W Fuller; Brandon E Jackson; Evan Bluhm; Dennis Evangelista; Zheng Wu; Margrit Betke; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Deep learning tools for the measurement of animal behavior in neuroscience.

Authors:  Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis; Alexander Mathis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 6.  Computational Neuroethology: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Sandeep Robert Datta; David J Anderson; Kristin Branson; Pietro Perona; Andrew Leifer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Standardized and reproducible measurement of decision-making in mice.

Authors:  Valeria Aguillon-Rodriguez; Dora Angelaki; Hannah Bayer; Niccolo Bonacchi; Matteo Carandini; Fanny Cazettes; Gaelle Chapuis; Anne K Churchland; Yang Dan; Eric Dewitt; Mayo Faulkner; Hamish Forrest; Laura Haetzel; Michael Häusser; Sonja B Hofer; Fei Hu; Anup Khanal; Christopher Krasniak; Ines Laranjeira; Zachary F Mainen; Guido Meijer; Nathaniel J Miska; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel; Masayoshi Murakami; Jean-Paul Noel; Alejandro Pan-Vazquez; Cyrille Rossant; Joshua Sanders; Karolina Socha; Rebecca Terry; Anne E Urai; Hernando Vergara; Miles Wells; Christian J Wilson; Ilana B Witten; Lauren E Wool; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; David Gonzalez; Mina Nouredanesh; James Tung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Anipose: A toolkit for robust markerless 3D pose estimation.

Authors:  Pierre Karashchuk; Katie L Rupp; Evyn S Dickinson; Sarah Walling-Bell; Elischa Sanders; Eiman Azim; Bingni W Brunton; John C Tuthill
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Linke; Daniel Link; Martin Lames
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.