Literature DB >> 36260545

Sharks are the preferred scraping surface for large pelagic fishes: Possible implications for parasite removal and fitness in a changing ocean.

Christopher D H Thompson1,2, Jessica J Meeuwig1.   

Abstract

Mutualistic and commensal interactions can have significant positive impacts on animal fitness and survival. However, behavioural interactions between pelagic animals living in offshore oceanic environments are little studied. Parasites can negatively effect the fitness of their hosts by draining resources and diverting energy from growth, reproduction, and other bodily functions. Pelagic fishes are hosts to a diverse array of parasites, however their environment provides few options for removal. Here we provide records of scraping behaviour of several pelagic teleost species, a behaviour that is likely used for parasite removal. These records span three ocean basins and, to the best of our knowledge, include the first records of scraping interactions involving tunas, blue sharks, and mako sharks as well as the first records of intraspecific scraping. We found that scrapers preferred scraping their head, eyes, gill cover, and lateral surfaces, areas where parasites are commonly found and where damage would likely have a substantial impact on fitness. Scraper species varied in their scraping preferences with tunas scraping mostly on the posterior caudal margins of sharks and occasionally conspecifics, while rainbow runner scraped in more varied locations on both sharks and conspecifics. Lengths of scrapers and scrapees were positively correlated and fish scraping on sharks were larger than those scraping on conspecifics, suggesting that risk of predation may be a limiting factor. We show that pelagic teleosts prefer to scrape on sharks rather than conspecifics or other teleosts and suggest that this behaviour may have a positive impact on teleost fitness by reducing parasite loads. The decline of shark populations in the global ocean and the reduction in mean size of many species may limit these interactions, eroding possible fitness benefits associated with this behaviour, and consequently placing more pressure on already highly targeted and vulnerable species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36260545      PMCID: PMC9581428          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  38 in total

Review 1.  Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived?

Authors:  Anthony D Barnosky; Nicholas Matzke; Susumu Tomiya; Guinevere O U Wogan; Brian Swartz; Tiago B Quental; Charles Marshall; Jenny L McGuire; Emily L Lindsey; Kaitlin C Maguire; Ben Mersey; Elizabeth A Ferrer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comparing the richness of metazoan ectoparasite communities of marine fishes: controlling for host phylogeny.

Authors:  Robert Poulin; Klaus Rohde
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Long-term cleaner fish presence affects growth of a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Gillian E Clague; Karen L Cheney; Anne W Goldizen; Mark I McCormick; Peter A Waldie; Alexandra S Grutter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  rfishbase: exploring, manipulating and visualizing FishBase data from R.

Authors:  C Boettiger; D T Lang; P C Wainwright
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.051

5.  Development of a behavioral model of TMJ pain in rats: the TMJ formalin test.

Authors:  Renata C Roveroni; Carlos A Parada; Maria Cecília; F A Veiga; Cláudia H Tambeli
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Molecules infer origins of ectoparasite infrapopulations on tuna.

Authors:  Stephen A Bullard; Oscar Olivares-Fuster; George W Benz; Covadonga R Arias
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success.

Authors:  Andréa Thiebault; Magali Semeria; Christophe Lett; Yann Tremblay
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Moving cages further offshore: effects on southern bluefin tuna, T. maccoyii, parasites, health and performance.

Authors:  Nicole T Kirchhoff; Kirsty M Rough; Barbara F Nowak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Decline of coastal apex shark populations over the past half century.

Authors:  George Roff; Christopher J Brown; Mark A Priest; Peter J Mumby
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-12-13

10.  Isolation and no-entry marine reserves mitigate anthropogenic impacts on grey reef shark behavior.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Juhel; Laurent Vigliola; Laurent Wantiez; Tom B Letessier; Jessica J Meeuwig; David Mouillot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.