Literature DB >> 28307435

Comparing the richness of metazoan ectoparasite communities of marine fishes: controlling for host phylogeny.

Robert Poulin1, Klaus Rohde2.   

Abstract

Parasite communities are the product of acquisitions and losses of parasite species during the evolutionary history of their host. When comparing the parasite communities of different host species to assess the role of ecological variables as determinants of parasite species richness, a correction must be made for the possible phylogenetic inheritance of parasites from ancestral hosts independent of host ecology. We performed a comparative analysis of the metazoan ectoparasite communities on the heads and gills of 111 species of marine fish. The influences of host body size, host schooling behaviour and water temperature were tested after controlling for both sampling and phylogenetic effects. Overall, water temperature correlated positively with both parasite species richness and abundance, whereas fish size only correlated with parasite abundance. The correlation across all fish species between water temperature and parasite species richness was dependent on an outlier point. The results, however, generally held when fish from different biogeographical areas (Pacific and Atlantic) were analysed separately. In all analyses, parasite species richness always correlated strongly with parasite abundance. There was no evidence that schooling fish taxa harboured richer or more abundant ectoparasite communities than their non-schooling sister taxa, possibly because of the small number of contrasts available for that test. Overall, whereas both water temperature and host size affect the number of parasite individuals that can be harboured by a fish, only temperature appears important as a determinant of ectoparasite community richness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Key words Fish ;  Parasites ;  Phylogenetic contrasts ;  Richness ;  Water temperature

Year:  1997        PMID: 28307435     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Parasite communities in three sympatric flounder species (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae): similar ecological filters driving toward repeatable assemblages.

Authors:  Ana J Alarcos; Juan T Timi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Site influence in parasite distribution from fishes of the Bonifacio Strait Marine Reserve (Corsica Island, Mediterranean Sea).

Authors:  S Ternengo; C Levron; D Mouillot; B Marchand
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  The importance of the compound community on the parasite infracommunity structure in a small benthic fish.

Authors:  Juan Tomás Timi; Ana Laura Lanfranchi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Ecological morphotaxometry of trematodes of garfish (Teleostomi: Belonidae) from Gangetic riverine ecosystem in India. II. Correlation of seasonality and host biology with distribution pattern of Cephalogonimus yamunii n.sp.

Authors:  Sushil K Upadhyay; Neeshma Jaiswal; Anshu Malhotra; Sandeep K Malhotra
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2012-09-11

5.  Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Van Beneden and Hesse 1863) (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea) parasite of cultured Gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata (Linnaeus 1758) (Pisces: Teleostei) from Corsica: ecological and morphological study.

Authors:  Laetitia Antonelli; Yann Quilichini; Bernard Marchand
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Lernanthropus kroyeri (Van Beneden and Hesse 1851) parasitic Copepoda (Siphonostomatoidae, Lernanthropidae) of European cultured sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus 1758) from Corsica: ecological and morphological study.

Authors:  Laetitia Antonelli; Yann Quilichini; Bernard Marchand
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Anisakid parasites of two forkbeards (Phycis blennoides and Phycis phycis) from the eastern Mediterranean coasts in Tunisia.

Authors:  Sarra Farjallah; Badreddine Ben Slimane; Hager Blel; Nabil Amor; Khaled Said
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Determinants and consequences of interspecific body size variation in tetraphyllidean tapeworms.

Authors:  Haseeb Sajjad Randhawa; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Response to Ascaridia galli infection in growing chickens in relation to their body weight.

Authors:  Gürbüz Daş; Matthias Gauly
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Can mixed-species groups reduce individual parasite load? A field test with two closely related poeciliid fishes (Poecilia reticulata and Poecilia picta).

Authors:  Felipe Dargent; Julián Torres-Dowdall; Marilyn E Scott; Indar Ramnarine; Gregor F Fussmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.