Literature DB >> 26768335

How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success.

Andréa Thiebault1,2, Magali Semeria1,3, Christophe Lett3, Yann Tremblay1.   

Abstract

Prey aggregations, such as fish schools, attract numerous predators. This typically leads to the formation of multispecific groups of predators. These aggregations can be seen both as a place of increased competition and as a place of possible facilitation between predators. Consequently, the functional role of such predator-prey aggregation is uncertain, and its effect on individual feeding success is virtually unknown. Using underwater film footage of different predators feeding on fish schools during the sardine run in South Africa, we directly measured the in situ feeding success of individual Cape gannets Morus capensis in different foraging situations. We determined the types of Cape gannet attacks (direct plunge dive or plunge dive followed by underwater pursuit) and we measured the occurrences and timing of attacks from the different species (mostly Cape gannets and long-beaked common dolphins Delphinus capensis). We also estimated the size of the targeted fish schools. These observations were complemented with a simulation model to evaluate the cumulative effect of successive predator attacks on the prey aggregation structure. The probability to capture a fish in one feeding attempt by Cape gannets averaged 0·28. It was lower when gannets engaged in underwater prey pursuit after the plunge compared to direct plunge (0·13 vs. 0·36). We found no effect of the number of prey on gannets' feeding success. However, the timing and frequency of attacks influenced strongly and positively the feeding success of individuals. The probability to capture a fish was the lowest (0·16) when no attack occurred in the few seconds (1-15 s) prior to a dive and the highest (˜0·4, i.e. more than twice) when one or two attacks occurred during this time window. The simulation model showed that a prey aggregation disorganized just after an attack and that the maximum of disturbance was obtained a few seconds after the initiation of the successive attacks. Our study suggests that, in multispecies predator assemblages, the cumulative effect (through disorganization of school cohesiveness) of the multiple species attacking a prey aggregation may increase the feeding success of each individual. Therefore, facilitation between predators is likely to overcome competition in these multispecific assemblages.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  boid; competition; dolphins; facilitation; foraging; gannets; group hunting; modelling; sardine run; video

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26768335     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  16 in total

1.  Proto-cooperation: group hunting sailfish improve hunting success by alternating attacks on grouping prey.

Authors:  James E Herbert-Read; Pawel Romanczuk; Stefan Krause; Daniel Strömbom; Pierre Couillaud; Paolo Domenici; Ralf H J M Kurvers; Stefano Marras; John F Steffensen; Alexander D M Wilson; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sharks are the preferred scraping surface for large pelagic fishes: Possible implications for parasite removal and fitness in a changing ocean.

Authors:  Christopher D H Thompson; Jessica J Meeuwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Evidence of sociality in the timing and location of foraging in a colonial seabird.

Authors:  Teri B Jones; Samantha C Patrick; John P Y Arnould; Marlenne A Rodríguez-Malagón; Melanie R Wells; Jonathan A Green
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Habitat-specific foraging strategies in Australasian gannets.

Authors:  Melanie R Wells; Lauren P Angel; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.422

5.  Seabird diving behaviour reveals the functional significance of shelf-sea fronts as foraging hotspots.

Authors:  S L Cox; P I Miller; C B Embling; K L Scales; A W J Bicknell; P J Hosegood; G Morgan; S N Ingram; S C Votier
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  A Balanced Mixture of Antagonistic Pressures Promotes the Evolution of Parallel Movement.

Authors:  Jure Demšar; Erik Štrumbelj; Iztok Lebar Bajec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evolution of Collective Behaviour in an Artificial World Using Linguistic Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems.

Authors:  Jure Demšar; Iztok Lebar Bajec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Seabird distribution patterns observed with fishing vessel's radar reveal previously undescribed sub-meso-scale clusters.

Authors:  Camille Assali; Nicolas Bez; Yann Tremblay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Group foraging in Socotra cormorants: A biologging approach to the study of a complex behavior.

Authors:  Timothée R Cook; Rob Gubiani; Peter G Ryan; Sabir B Muzaffar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Seabird acoustic communication at sea: a new perspective using bio-logging devices.

Authors:  Andréa Thiebault; Pierre Pistorius; Ralf Mullers; Yann Tremblay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.