Literature DB >> 36260201

Consistency of Eye Coloration Across Different Relationship Partners.

Amy V Newman1, Thomas V Pollet2, Kristofor McCarty2, Nick Neave2, Tamsin K Saxton2.   

Abstract

Studies have indicated that people are attracted to partners who resemble themselves or their parents, in terms of physical traits including eye color. We might anticipate this inclination to be relatively stable, giving rise to a sequential selection of similar partners who then represent an individual's "type". We tested this idea by examining whether people's sequential partners resembled each other at the level of eye color. We gathered details of the eye colors of the partners of participants (N = 579) across their adult romantic history (N = 3250 relationships), in three samples, comprising two samples which made use of self-reports from predominantly UK-based participants, and one which made use of publicly available information about celebrity relationship histories. Recorded partner eye colors comprised black (N = 39 partners), dark brown (N = 884), light brown (N = 393), hazel (N = 224), blue (N = 936), blue green (N = 245), grey (N = 34), and green (N = 229). We calculated the proportion of identical eye colors within each participant's relationship history, and compared that to 100,000 random permutations of our dataset, using t-tests to investigate if the eye color of partners across an individual's relationship history was biased relative to chance (i.e., if there was greater consistency, represented by higher calculated proportions of identical eye colors, in the original dataset than in the permutations). To account for possible eye color reporting errors and ethnic group matching, we ran the analyses restricted to White participants and to high-confidence eye color data; we then ran the analyses again in relation to the complete dataset. We found some limited evidence for some consistency of eye color across people's relationship histories in some of the samples only when using the complete dataset. We discuss the issues of small effect sizes, partner-report bias, and ethnic group matching in investigating partner consistency across time.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consistency of preferences; Evolutionary psychology; Eye color; Mate choice

Year:  2022        PMID: 36260201     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02450-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  19 in total

Review 1.  Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management.

Authors:  Suzanne Edmands
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; David I Perrett; Anthony C Little; David R Feinberg; Miriam J Law Smith
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-02

3.  Heterosexual romantic couples mate assortatively for facial symmetry, but not masculinity.

Authors:  Robert P Burriss; S Craig Roberts; Lisa L M Welling; David A Puts; Anthony C Little
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-02-22

4.  Consistency and inconsistency among romantic partners over time.

Authors:  Paul W Eastwick; K Paige Harden; Jennifer A Shukusky; Taylor Anne Morgan; Samantha Joel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2017-03-02

5.  Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Evolution of human serial pairbonding.

Authors:  H E Fisher
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Sexual imprinting in human mate choice.

Authors:  Tamas Bereczkei; Petra Gyuris; Glenn E Weisfeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  An association between the kinship and fertility of human couples.

Authors:  Agnar Helgason; Saebjörn Pálsson; Daníel F Gudbjartsson; Thornórdur Kristjánsson; Kári Stefánsson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Human Commercial Models' Eye Colour Shows Negative Frequency-Dependent Selection.

Authors:  Isabela Rodrigues Nogueira Forti; Robert John Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Men's preference for women's facial features: testing homogamy and the paternity uncertainty hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeanne Bovet; Julien Barthes; Valérie Durand; Michel Raymond; Alexandra Alvergne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.