Literature DB >> 18258915

An association between the kinship and fertility of human couples.

Agnar Helgason1, Saebjörn Pálsson, Daníel F Gudbjartsson, Thornórdur Kristjánsson, Kári Stefánsson.   

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that related human couples tend to produce more children than unrelated couples but have been unable to determine whether this difference is biological or stems from socioeconomic variables. Our results, drawn from all known couples of the Icelandic population born between 1800 and 1965, show a significant positive association between kinship and fertility, with the greatest reproductive success observed for couples related at the level of third and fourth cousins. Owing to the relative socioeconomic homogeneity of Icelanders, and the observation of highly significant differences in the fertility of couples separated by very fine intervals of kinship, we conclude that this association is likely to have a biological basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258915     DOI: 10.1126/science.1150232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  34 in total

1.  The existence of species rests on a metastable equilibrium between inbreeding and outbreeding. An essay on the close relationship between speciation, inbreeding and recessive mutations.

Authors:  Etienne Joly
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.540

2.  Genetic and socioeconomic study of mate choice in Latinos reveals novel assortment patterns.

Authors:  James Y Zou; Danny S Park; Esteban G Burchard; Dara G Torgerson; Maria Pino-Yanes; Yun S Song; Sriram Sankararaman; Eran Halperin; Noah Zaitlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Crowdsourced genealogies and genomes.

Authors:  Alexandre A Lussier; Alon Keinan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comparing population structure as inferred from genealogical versus genetic information.

Authors:  Vincenza Colonna; Teresa Nutile; Ronald R Ferrucci; Giulio Fardella; Mario Aversano; Guido Barbujani; Marina Ciullo
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Consanguinity and increased risk for schizophrenia in Egypt.

Authors:  Hader Mansour; Warda Fathi; Lambertus Klei; Joel Wood; Kodavali Chowdari; Annie Watson; Ahmed Eissa; Mai Elassy; Ibtihal Ali; Hala Salah; Amal Yassin; Salwa Tobar; Hala El-Boraie; Hanan Gaafar; Nahed E Ibrahim; Kareem Kandil; Wafaa El-Bahaei; Osama El-Boraie; Mohamed Alatrouny; Farha El-Chennawi; Bernie Devlin; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Fitness consequences of spousal relatedness in 46 small-scale societies.

Authors:  Drew H Bailey; Kim R Hill; Robert S Walker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Selection against variants in the genome associated with educational attainment.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Michael L Frigge; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Hreinn Stefansson; Alexander I Young; Florian Zink; Gudrun A Jonsdottir; Aysu Okbay; Patrick Sulem; Gisli Masson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The genome, microbiome and evolutionary medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Brunham
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.

Authors:  Ghazi O Tadmouri; Pratibha Nair; Tasneem Obeid; Mahmoud T Al Ali; Najib Al Khaja; Hanan A Hamamy
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.