Literature DB >> 36251056

Nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: effectiveness, safety and tips, and tricks.

Panagiotis Kallidonis1, Arman Tsaturyan2, Gabriel Faria-Costa3,4, Begona Ballesta Martinez2, Angelis Peteinaris2, Constantinos Adamou2, Konstantinos Pagonis2, Anastasios Natsos2, Theofanis Vrettos5, Evangelos Liatsikos2,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) and provide practical tips and tricks for the successful accomplishment of the procedure respecting the anatomical particularities.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study is an analysis of a prospectively collected database including all cases of ECIRS performed between January 2019 and December 2021 in a high-volume tertiary center. All patients underwent the procedure in prone-split leg position. A nonpapillary renal puncture was performed. The used access sheaths were 22Fr or 30Fr. Lithotripsy was performed anterogradely with a dual-energy lithotripter with incorporated suction and retrogradely with holmium Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser.
RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included. The initial stone-free rate (SFR) was 84.8% and the final SFR was 90.9%. The median stone size was 35 mm and 60% of patients had staghorn calculi. The prevalence of renal abnormalities was 21.3%, including 3 cases of horseshoe kidney, 2 cases of malrotation and 2 cases with complete duplicated systems. The median operative time was 47 min. The median hospital stay was 3 days and median hemoglobin loss was 1.2 gr/dL. Overall, the complication rate was 9.1%, all being Grade II complications (n = 2 fever and n = 1 transient bleeding).
CONCLUSIONS: Nonpapillary prone ECIRS is an effective and safe procedure. Standardization of the procedure is critical to achieve good outcomes. Patients who benefit the most are probably the ones where additional punctures can be avoided using this technique, namely patients with renal abnormalities, incrusted ureteral stents and staghorn stones.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECIRS; Indications; Intrarenal surgery; Nonpapillary PCNL; Tips and tricks

Year:  2022        PMID: 36251056     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04178-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   3.661


  30 in total

Review 1.  ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new life for percutaneous surgery?

Authors:  Cecilia Maria Cracco; Cesare Marco Scoffone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Can Accurately Predict High Stone Clearance Rates on Postoperative CT.

Authors:  Michael Schulster; Alexander C Small; Mark V Silva; Joel E Abbott; Julio G Davalos
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cecilia Maria Cracco; Cesare Marco Scoffone
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 4.  Invited review: the tale of ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position.

Authors:  Cesare Marco Scoffone; Cecilia Maria Cracco
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Developments in the technique of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position.

Authors:  Shuzo Hamamoto; Takahiro Yasui; Atsushi Okada; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Kazumi Taguchi; Yuta Shibamoto; Yutaka Iwase; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Wahib Isac; Emad Rizkala; Xiaobo Liu; Mark Noble; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy.

Authors:  Shuzo Hamamoto; Takahiro Yasui; Atsushi Okada; Kazumi Taguchi; Noriyasu Kawai; Ryosuke Ando; Kentaro Mizuno; Yasue Kubota; Hiroyuki Kamiya; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Cesare M Scoffone; Cecilia M Cracco; Marco Cossu; Susanna Grande; Massimiliano Poggio; Roberto M Scarpa
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Fangzhou Zhao; Jun Li; Lei Tang; Chunming Li
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Challenging the wisdom of puncture at the calyceal fornix in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: feasibility and safety study with 137 patients operated via a non-calyceal percutaneous track.

Authors:  Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Marinos Vasilas; Vasilios Panagopoulos; Wissam Kamal; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.