Literature DB >> 27510761

Challenging the wisdom of puncture at the calyceal fornix in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: feasibility and safety study with 137 patients operated via a non-calyceal percutaneous track.

Iason Kyriazis1, Panagiotis Kallidonis2, Marinos Vasilas2, Vasilios Panagopoulos2, Wissam Kamal2, Evangelos Liatsikos2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present our experience with a central, non-calyceal puncture protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in an attempt to challenge the opinion of worldwide adopted calyceal puncture as the less traumatic site of percutaneous entrance into the collecting system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 2012, a total of 137 consecutive, unselected patients were subjected to PCNL in our department. Non-calyceal punctures were performed to all cases and followed by subsequent track dilations up to 30 Fr. Perioperative and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Mean operative time (from skin puncture to nephrostomy tube placement) was 48 min. Patients with single, multiple and staghorn stones had primary stone-free rates of 89.2, 80.4 and 66.7 % after PCNL, respectively. The overall complication rate was 10.2 %, while bleeding complications were minimal. Only 4 patients (2.9 %) required blood transfusion. Five patients (3.6 %) had Clavien Grade IIIa complications requiring an intervention for their management and none Grade IV or V.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the absence of evidence that non-calyceal percutaneous tracts could be a risk factor for complications, the concept of calyceal puncture has been worldwide adopted by PCNL surgeons as the sole safe percutaneous entrance into the collective system. Based on our experience, other pathways than the worldwide recognized rule, calyceal puncture, are possible and probably not as dangerous as has been previously stated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access; Bleeding; Central puncture; Complications; Morbidity; Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27510761     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1919-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  11 in total

1.  Intrarenal access: 3-dimensional anatomical study.

Authors:  F J Sampaio; J F Zanier; A H Aragão; L A Favorito
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Evaluating the definition of "stone free status" in contemporary urologic literature.

Authors:  L A Deters; C M Jumper; P L Steinberg; V M Pais
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.975

Review 3.  A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cao Dehong; Liu Liangren; Liu Huawei; Wei Qiang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuba De; Riccardo Autorino; Fernando J Kim; Homayoun Zargar; Humberto Laydner; Raffaele Balsamo; Fabio C Torricelli; Carmine Di Palma; Wilson R Molina; Manoj Monga; Marco De Sio
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Kidney targeting and puncturing during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: recent advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Pedro L Rodrigues; Nuno F Rodrigues; Jaime Fonseca; Estevão Lima; João L Vilaça
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study.

Authors:  Akito Yamaguchi; Andreas Skolarikos; Niels-Peter Noor Buchholz; Gonzalo Bueno Chomón; Michael Grasso; Pietro Saba; Stephen Nakada; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  Image-guided adrenal and renal biopsy.

Authors:  Karun V Sharma; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Daniel Swerdlow; Daniel DaSilva; Avi Beck; Nidhi Jain; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-06

8.  Risk factors for hemorrhage requiring embolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sitki Un; Volkan Cakir; Cengiz Kara; Hakan Turk; Osman Kose; Omur Balli; Yuksel Yilmaz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Analysis of the factors affecting blood loss in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a registry of the Spanish Association of Urology in the supine position.

Authors:  F Ramón de Fata; D Pérez; L Resel-Folkersma; J A Galán; A Serrano; A Servera; M Arrabal; J L Álvarez-Ossorio; R Ballestero; E Cao; M Arzoz; P Navarro; M Rigabert; J M Sánchez-Zalabardo; F Lista; J C Angulo; J H Amón-Sesmero
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 0.994

10.  Comparison of single-stick and double-stick techniques for percutaneous nephrostomy.

Authors:  Brian Funaki; Geogi Vatakencherry
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  10 in total

1.  Papillary puncture: still a good practice.

Authors:  Davide Campobasso; Stefania Ferretti; Antonio Frattini
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Papillary puncture: no way!

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Arman Tsaturyan; Marco Lattarulo; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-06-05

4.  Renal puncture access via a nonpapillary track in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an in vitro porcine kidney experience.

Authors:  Bingbing Hou; Mingquan Wang; Ziyan Song; Qiushi He; Zongyao Hao
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  The use of ureteral access sheath during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with high-power holmium YAG laser.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; Marco Lattarulo; Constantinos Adamou; Konstantinos Pagonis; Angelis Peteinaris; Despoina Liourdi; Theofanis Vrettos; Evangelos Liatsikos; Panagiotis Kallidonis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Percutaneous puncture during PCNL: new perspective for the future with virtual imaging guidance.

Authors:  E Checcucci; D Amparore; G Volpi; F Piramide; S De Cillis; A Piana; P Alessio; P Verri; S Piscitello; B Carbonaro; J Meziere; D Zamengo; A Tsaturyan; G Cacciamani; Juan Gomez Rivas; S De Luca; M Manfredi; C Fiori; E Liatsikos; F Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: effectiveness, safety and tips, and tricks.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Arman Tsaturyan; Gabriel Faria-Costa; Begona Ballesta Martinez; Angelis Peteinaris; Constantinos Adamou; Konstantinos Pagonis; Anastasios Natsos; Theofanis Vrettos; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Non papillary mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: early experience.

Authors:  P Kallidonis; A Vagionis; T Vrettos; K Adamou; K Pagonis; P Ntasiotis; G A Callas; L Tanaseskou; A M Al Aown; E Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its advantages and our technique for puncture.

Authors:  Diego M Carrion; José Ramón Cansino; Luis M Quintana; Juan Gómez Rivas; Juan Antonio Mainez Rodriguez; José Ramón Pérez-Carral; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12

Review 10.  Performing easy prone punction.

Authors:  Ramón Cansino; Alejandra Portilla; Juan Gómez Rivas
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-06-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.