Literature DB >> 18715696

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Cesare M Scoffone1, Cecilia M Cracco, Marco Cossu, Susanna Grande, Massimiliano Poggio, Roberto M Scarpa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), the gold standard for the management of large and/or complex urolithiasis, is conventionally performed with the patient in the prone position, which has several drawbacks. Of the various changes in patient positioning proposed over the years, the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position seems the most beneficial. It allows simultaneous performance of PCNL and retrograde ureteroscopy (ECIRS, Endoscopic Combined Intra-Renal Surgery) and has unquestionable anaesthesiological advantages.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively analyse the safety and efficacy of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in GMSV position for the treatment of large and/or complex urolithiasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From April 2004 to December 2007, 127 consecutive patients who were followed in our department for large and/or complex urolithiasis were selected for surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score 1-3, no active urinary tract infection [UTI], any body mass index [BMI]). INTERVENTION: All the patients underwent ECIRS in GMSV position. Technical choices about percutaneous access, endoscopic instruments and accessories, and postoperative renal and ureteral drainage are detailed. MEASUREMENTS: Patients' mean age plus or minus standard deviation (+/- SD) was 53.1 yr+/-14.2. Of the 127 patients, 5.5% had congenital renal abnormalities, 3.9% had solitary kidneys, and 60.6% were symptomatic for renal colics, haematuria, and recurrent UTI. Mean stone size+/-SD was 23.8mm+/-7.3 (range: 11-40); 33.8% of the calculi were calyceal, 33.1% were pelvic, 33.1% were multiple or staghorn, and 4.7% were also ureteral. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean operative time+/-SD was 70min+/-28, including patient positioning. Stone-free rate was 81.9% after the first treatment and was 87.4% after a second early treatment using the same percutaneous access during the same hospital stay (mean+/-SD: 5.1 d+/-2.9). We registered overall complications at 38.6% with no splanchnic injuries or deaths and no perioperative anaesthesiological problems.
CONCLUSIONS: ECIRS performed in GMSV position seems to be a safe, effective, and versatile procedure with a high one-step stone-free rate, unquestionable anaesthesiological advantages, and no additional procedure-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715696     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  61 in total

1.  Multimedia article. Navigated renal access using electromagnetic tracking: an initial experience.

Authors:  Johannes Huber; Ingmar Wegner; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Peter Hallscheidt; Boris Hadaschik; Sascha Pahernik; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach.

Authors:  Ryoji Takazawa; Sachi Kitayama; Toshihiko Tsujii
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

3.  Combined micro-and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal calculi.

Authors:  İbrahim Buldu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatağ; Ramazan İnan; Abdullah Armağan; Okan İstanbulluoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

Review 4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Francisco Daels; Janak Desai; Andras Hoznek; Bodo Knudsen; Emanuele Montanari; Cesare Scoffone; Andreas Skolarikos; Keiichi Tozawa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prospective evaluation of kidney displacement during supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Incidence, significance, and analysis of predictive factors.

Authors:  Başak Gülpinar; Aykut Akinci; Evren Süer; Adem Sanci; Muammer Babayiğit; Yaşar Bedük; Sümer Baltaci; Mehmet İlker Gökce
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Li Wang; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  [Simultaneous antegrade-retrograde therapy for renal calculi].

Authors:  T Knoll
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Reproducibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position.

Authors:  Luis Llanes; Javier Sáenz; Mikel Gamarra; Daniel A Pérez; Alvaro Juárez; Camilo García; José M Arroyo; Gaspar Ibarluzea
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  How should patients with cystine stone disease be evaluated and treated in the twenty-first century?

Authors:  Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Katja Venborg Pedersen; Susanne Sloth Osther; Helene Ulrik Jung; Søren Kissow Lildal; Palle Joern Sloth Osther
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.