Literature DB >> 36246854

Bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses: application of adaptive FDR-controlling in segmented failure data.

Aniket Biswas1, Gaurangadeb Chattopadhyay2, Aditya Chatterjee2.   

Abstract

Two recently introduced model-based bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses ( π 0 ) under multiple hypotheses testing scenario have been restructured for random observations under a suitable failure model, available for each of the common hypotheses. Based on stochastic ordering, a new motivation behind formulation of some related estimators for π 0 is given. The reduction of bias for the model-based estimators are theoretically justified and algorithms for computing the estimators are also presented. The estimators are also used to formulate a popular adaptive multiple testing procedure. Extensive numerical study supports superiority of the bias-corrected estimators. The necessity of the proper distributional assumption for the failure data in the context of the model-based bias-corrected method has been highlighted. A case-study is done with a real-life dataset in connection with reliability and warranty studies to demonstrate the applicability of the procedure, under a non-Gaussian setup. The results obtained are in line with the intuition and experience of the subject expert. An intriguing discussion has been attempted to conclude the article that also indicates the future scope of study.
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  62F99; 62N99; 62P30; Multiple hypotheses testing; adaptive Benjamini–Hochberg algorithm; mean mileage to failure; p-value

Year:  2021        PMID: 36246854      PMCID: PMC9562841          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1957790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  9 in total

1.  Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values.

Authors:  Stan Pounds; Stephan W Morris
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures.

Authors:  Hong-Qiang Wang; Lindsey K Tuominen; Chung-Jui Tsai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Stan Pounds; Cheng Cheng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.

Authors:  J J Chen; S-J Wang; C-A Tsai; C-J Lin
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  A censored beta mixture model for the estimation of the proportion of non-differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Anastasios Markitsis; Yinglei Lai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The behavior of the P-value when the alternative hypothesis is true.

Authors:  H M Hung; R T O'Neill; P Bauer; K Köhne
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses.

Authors:  Yebin Cheng; Dexiang Gao; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses Using the Pattern of Observed p-values.

Authors:  Tiejun Tong; Zeny Feng; Julia S Hilton; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.404

9.  Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for multiple comparisons.

Authors:  Hongmei Jiang; R W Doerge
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-02-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.