Literature DB >> 20080506

A censored beta mixture model for the estimation of the proportion of non-differentially expressed genes.

Anastasios Markitsis1, Yinglei Lai.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The proportion of non-differentially expressed genes (pi(0)) is an important quantity in microarray data analysis. Although many statistical methods have been proposed for its estimation, it is still necessary to develop more efficient methods.
METHODS: Our approach for improving pi(0) estimation is to modify an existing simple method by introducing artificial censoring to P-values. In a comprehensive simulation study and the applications to experimental datasets, we compare our method with eight existing estimation methods.
RESULTS: The simulation study confirms that our method can clearly improve the estimation performance. Compared with the existing methods, our method can generally provide a relatively accurate estimate with relatively small variance. Using experimental microarray datasets, we also demonstrate that our method can generally provide satisfactory estimates in practice. AVAILABILITY: The R code is freely available at http://home.gwu.edu/~ylai/research/CBpi0/.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20080506      PMCID: PMC2828110          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  31 in total

1.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sample size for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Sue-Jane Wang; James J Chen
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Yinglei Lai
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Ugrappa Nagalakshmi; Zhong Wang; Karl Waern; Chong Shou; Debasish Raha; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray.

Authors:  M Schena; D Shalon; R W Davis; P O Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A whole genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting milk protein percentage in Israeli-Holstein cattle, by means of selective milk DNA pooling in a daughter design, using an adjusted false discovery rate criterion.

Authors:  M O Mosig; E Lipkin; G Khutoreskaya; E Tchourzyna; M Soller; A Friedmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Detrimental effects of Bartonella henselae are counteracted by L-arginine and nitric oxide in human endothelial progenitor cells.

Authors:  Paola Salvatore; Amelia Casamassimi; Linda Sommese; Carmela Fiorito; Alfredo Ciccodicola; Raffaele Rossiello; Bice Avallone; Vincenzo Grimaldi; Valerio Costa; Monica Rienzo; Roberta Colicchio; Sharon Williams-Ignarro; Caterina Pagliarulo; Maria Evelina Prudente; Ciro Abbondanza; Florentia Lamberti; Adone Baroni; Elisabetta Buommino; Bartolomeo Farzati; Maria Antonietta Tufano; Louis Joseph Ignarro; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes.

Authors:  Vamsi K Mootha; Cecilia M Lindgren; Karl-Fredrik Eriksson; Aravind Subramanian; Smita Sihag; Joseph Lehar; Pere Puigserver; Emma Carlsson; Martin Ridderstråle; Esa Laurila; Nicholas Houstis; Mark J Daly; Nick Patterson; Jill P Mesirov; Todd R Golub; Pablo Tamayo; Bruce Spiegelman; Eric S Lander; Joel N Hirschhorn; David Altshuler; Leif C Groop
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for multiple comparisons.

Authors:  Hongmei Jiang; R W Doerge
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-02-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses when the statistics are discrete.

Authors:  Isaac Dialsingh; Stefanie R Austin; Naomi S Altman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A parametric model to estimate the proportion from true null using a distribution for p-values.

Authors:  Chang Yu; Daniel Zelterman
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses: application of adaptive FDR-controlling in segmented failure data.

Authors:  Aniket Biswas; Gaurangadeb Chattopadhyay; Aditya Chatterjee
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  A statistical method for the conservative adjustment of false discovery rate (q-value).

Authors:  Yinglei Lai
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.