MOTIVATION: The pre-estimate of the proportion of null hypotheses (π(0)) plays a critical role in controlling false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple hypothesis testing. However, hidden complex dependence structures of many genomics datasets distort the distribution of p-values, rendering existing π(0) estimators less effective. RESULTS: From the basic non-linear model of the q-value method, we developed a simple linear algorithm to probe local dependence blocks. We uncovered a non-static relationship between tests' p-values and their corresponding q-values that is influenced by data structure and π(0). Using an optimization framework, these findings were exploited to devise a Sliding Linear Model (SLIM) to more reliably estimate π(0) under dependence. When tested on a number of simulation datasets with varying data dependence structures and on microarray data, SLIM was found to be robust in estimating π(0) against dependence. The accuracy of its π(0) estimation suggests that SLIM can be used as a stand-alone tool for prediction of significant tests. AVAILABILITY: The R code of the proposed method is available at http://aspendb.uga.edu/downloads for academic use.
MOTIVATION: The pre-estimate of the proportion of null hypotheses (π(0)) plays a critical role in controlling false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple hypothesis testing. However, hidden complex dependence structures of many genomics datasets distort the distribution of p-values, rendering existing π(0) estimators less effective. RESULTS: From the basic non-linear model of the q-value method, we developed a simple linear algorithm to probe local dependence blocks. We uncovered a non-static relationship between tests' p-values and their corresponding q-values that is influenced by data structure and π(0). Using an optimization framework, these findings were exploited to devise a Sliding Linear Model (SLIM) to more reliably estimate π(0) under dependence. When tested on a number of simulation datasets with varying data dependence structures and on microarray data, SLIM was found to be robust in estimating π(0) against dependence. The accuracy of its π(0) estimation suggests that SLIM can be used as a stand-alone tool for prediction of significant tests. AVAILABILITY: The R code of the proposed method is available at http://aspendb.uga.edu/downloads for academic use.
Authors: Jing Xue; Raad Z Gharaibeh; Edward W Pietryk; Cory Brouwer; Lisa M Tarantino; William Valdar; Folami Y Ideraabdullah Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2018-10-21 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: A V Krivtsov; M E Figueroa; A U Sinha; M C Stubbs; Z Feng; P J M Valk; R Delwel; K Döhner; L Bullinger; A L Kung; A M Melnick; S A Armstrong Journal: Leukemia Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Tiffany A Katz; Serena G Liao; Vincent J Palmieri; Robert K Dearth; Thushangi N Pathiraja; Zhiguang Huo; Patricia Shaw; Sarah Small; Nancy E Davidson; David G Peters; George C Tseng; Steffi Oesterreich; Adrian V Lee Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2015-08-19
Authors: Christopher B Mulholland; Atsuya Nishiyama; Joel Ryan; Ryohei Nakamura; Merve Yiğit; Ivo M Glück; Carina Trummer; Weihua Qin; Michael D Bartoschek; Franziska R Traube; Edris Parsa; Enes Ugur; Miha Modic; Aishwarya Acharya; Paul Stolz; Christoph Ziegenhain; Michael Wierer; Wolfgang Enard; Thomas Carell; Don C Lamb; Hiroyuki Takeda; Makoto Nakanishi; Sebastian Bultmann; Heinrich Leonhardt Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Hanghang Zhang; Somnath Pandey; Meghan Travers; Hongxing Sun; George Morton; Jozef Madzo; Woonbok Chung; Jittasak Khowsathit; Oscar Perez-Leal; Carlos A Barrero; Carmen Merali; Yasuyuki Okamoto; Takahiro Sato; Joshua Pan; Judit Garriga; Natarajan V Bhanu; Johayra Simithy; Bela Patel; Jian Huang; Noël J-M Raynal; Benjamin A Garcia; Marlene A Jacobson; Cigall Kadoch; Salim Merali; Yi Zhang; Wayne Childers; Magid Abou-Gharbia; John Karanicolas; Stephen B Baylin; Cynthia A Zahnow; Jaroslav Jelinek; Xavier Graña; Jean-Pierre J Issa Journal: Cell Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 41.582