Literature DB >> 24078762

Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses Using the Pattern of Observed p-values.

Tiejun Tong1, Zeny Feng, Julia S Hilton, Hongyu Zhao.   

Abstract

Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, π0, has attracted much attention in the recent statistical literature. Besides its apparent relevance for a set of specific scientific hypotheses, an accurate estimate of this parameter is key for many multiple testing procedures. Most existing methods for estimating π0 in the literature are motivated from the independence assumption of test statistics, which is often not true in reality. Simulations indicate that most existing estimators in the presence of the dependence among test statistics can be poor, mainly due to the increase of variation in these estimators. In this paper, we propose several data-driven methods for estimating π0 by incorporating the distribution pattern of the observed p-values as a practical approach to address potential dependence among test statistics. Specifically, we use a linear fit to give a data-driven estimate for the proportion of true-null p-values in (λ, 1] over the whole range [0, 1] instead of using the expected proportion at 1 - λ. We find that the proposed estimators may substantially decrease the variance of the estimated true null proportion and thus improve the overall performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gene expression data; multiple testing; p-value; proportion of true null hypotheses

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078762      PMCID: PMC3781956          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.800035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.404


  16 in total

1.  Estimation of the number of "true" null hypotheses in multivariate analysis of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  F E Turkheimer; C B Smith; K Schmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.

Authors:  Huey-miin Hsueh; James J Chen; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.

Authors:  Xiangqin Cui; J T Gene Hwang; Jing Qiu; Natalie J Blades; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Yinglei Lai
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.

Authors:  Baolin Wu; Zhong Guan; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Exploring the information in p-values for the analysis and planning of multiple-test experiments.

Authors:  David Ruppert; Dan Nettleton; J T Gene Hwang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A whole genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting milk protein percentage in Israeli-Holstein cattle, by means of selective milk DNA pooling in a daughter design, using an adjusted false discovery rate criterion.

Authors:  M O Mosig; E Lipkin; G Khutoreskaya; E Tchourzyna; M Soller; A Friedmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Arf induces p53-dependent and -independent antiproliferative genes.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Kuo; Eric J Duncavage; Rose Mathew; Willem den Besten; Deqing Pei; Deanna Naeve; Tadashi Yamamoto; Cheng Cheng; Charles J Sherr; Martine F Roussel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Per Broberg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for multiple comparisons.

Authors:  Hongmei Jiang; R W Doerge
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-02-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses.

Authors:  Yebin Cheng; Dexiang Gao; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses: application of adaptive FDR-controlling in segmented failure data.

Authors:  Aniket Biswas; Gaurangadeb Chattopadhyay; Aditya Chatterjee
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.416

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.