| Literature DB >> 36235942 |
Govindaraj Sabarees1, Vadivel Velmurugan1, Ganesan Padmini Tamilarasi2, Veerachamy Alagarsamy3, Viswas Raja Solomon3.
Abstract
Infections are the primary cause of death from burns and diabetic wounds. The clinical difficulty of treating wound infections with conventional antibiotics has progressively increased and reached a critical level, necessitating a paradigm change for enhanced chronic wound care. The most prevalent bacterium linked with these infections is Staphylococcus aureus, and the advent of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has posed a substantial therapeutic challenge. Most existing wound dressings are ineffective and suffer from constraints such as insufficient antibacterial activity, toxicity, failure to supply enough moisture to the wound, and poor mechanical performance. Using ineffective wound dressings might prolong the healing process of a wound. To meet this requirement, nanoscale scaffolds with their desirable qualities, which include the potential to distribute bioactive agents, a large surface area, enhanced mechanical capabilities, the ability to imitate the extracellular matrix (ECM), and high porosity, have attracted considerable interest. The incorporation of nanoparticles into nanofiber scaffolds constitutes a novel approach to "nanoparticle dressing" that has acquired significant popularity for wound healing. Due to their remarkable antibacterial capabilities, silver nanoparticles are attractive materials for wound healing. This review focuses on the therapeutic applications of nanofiber wound dressings containing Ag-NPs and their potential to revolutionize wound healing.Entities:
Keywords: chronic wound management; composite nanofibers; drug delivery; silver nanoparticles; skin tissue engineering; wound dressing; wound healing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235942 PMCID: PMC9571512 DOI: 10.3390/polym14193994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1A diagrammatic illustration of the basic steps of cutaneous wound healing.
Figure 2A diagrammatic illustration of a three-dimensional (3D) structure of the skin.
Figure 3Biomedical applications of silver nanoparticles.
Figure 4Antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles.
Figure 5Different approaches of silver nanoparticles synthesis.
Figure 6A schematic diagram of electrospinning apparatus.
Figure 7Key properties of electrospun nanofibers.
Figure 8Characteristics of AgNPs containing nanofibers on wound healing.
Various forms of fabricated biomaterials for wound healing applications.
| S. No. | Wound Dressing Materials | Fabrication Techniques and Outcomes | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polyurethane/keratin/AgNP biocomposite mats | [ | |
| 2 | Hyaluronan and PVA embedded-AgNP Hydrogel | [ | |
| 3 | Genipin-crosslinked chitosan/poly(ethylene glycol)ZnO/Ag | [ | |
| 4 | AgNP-Calcium alginate beads in gelatin scaffolds | [ | |
| 5 | Chitosan-hyaluronan nano composite sponges | [ | |
| 6 | Methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-graft-chitosan composite film | [ | |
| 7 | Tannic acid/chitosan/pullulan composite nanofibers | [ | |
| 8 | Ag/ZnO nanocomposites | [ | |
| 9 | Silver/hyaluronan bio-nanocomposite fabrics | [ | |
| 10 | Chitosan-Ag/ZnO composite dressing | [ | |
| 11 | Starch-AgNPs | [ | |
| 12 | Cellulose/Polypyrrole/AgNPs/ Ionic liquid composite films | [ | |
| 13 | Fibrin nanoconstructs | [ |
The benefits and drawbacks of the various types of nanomaterials.
| S. No. | Wound Dressing Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fibers |
nonadherent, nontoxic, nonallergenic allow gaseous exchange remove excess exudates barrier against microbes sustain release maintain humidity tensile strength increase bioavailability fibroblast attachment and proliferation keratinocyte attachment and proliferation tunable porosity ECM mimicking bio-compatibility electro-catalytic properties thermal conductivity electrical conductivity structural stability loading efficiency high surface area to volume ratio mechanical strength |
unsuitable for third degree, eschar, and dry wounds if the wound is highly exudative, need a secondary dressing | [ |
| 2 | Membranes |
act as physical barriers membranes simulate extracellular matrix (ECM) structure assure gas exchange, cell proliferation, and nutrient supply |
the materials and solvents used in the production process may be harmful | [ |
| 3 | Films |
impermeable to bacteria allows the healing process to be monitored painless removal |
hard to handle non-absorbent adhere to the wound bed and cause exudate accumulation | [ |
| 4 | Hydrocolloids |
non-adherent high density painless removal high absorption properties |
can be cytotoxic have an unpleasant odor low mechanical stability maintain acidic pH at the wound site | [ |
| 5 | Hydrogels |
high absorption properties provide a moist environment at the wound site water retention oxygen permeability ensure the solubility of growth factor/antimicrobial agents |
weak mechanical properties need a secondary dressing | [ |
| 6 | Sponges |
high porosity thermal insulation sustain a moist environment absorb wound exudates enhance tissue regeneration |
mechanically weak may provoke skin maceration unsuitable for third degree burn treatment or wounds with dry eschar | [ |
A summary of available AgNP-based wound dressing products and their benefits.
| S. No. | Wound Dressing Materials | Size of AgNPs (nm) | Target Microbe | In Vivo/In Vitro Model | Advantage of Nanocoating | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chitosan-Poly Vinyl Pyrrolidone (PVP) composite | 10–30 | L929 cell line | Compared to the control sample, silver nanocomposite reduced the amount of inflammatory cells by 99. | [ | |
| 2 | Plumbagin caged AgNP-collagen scaffolds | 60 nm | wistar rat/Swiss 3T6 | The antibacterial and wound-healing capabilities of silver and plumbagin in the PCSN cross-linked collagen scaffold showed the importance of nano-biotechnology. | [ | |
| 3 | Chitosan/Poly (Ethylene Oxide) matrix | 5 |
| - | AgNPs, because of their size and structure, were found to increase antibacterial activity when introduced. | [ |
| 4 | Chitin/nanosilver composite scaffolds | 5 nm | L929 | The scaffolds are antibacterial and have excellent blood clotting capabilities, which will help with wound healing. These scaffolds were hazardous to mouse fibroblasts in vitro. Whether in vitro cytotoxicity affects in vivo wound healing is unknown. | [ | |
| 5 | Activated Carbon coated silver nanocomposite | 50–400 | - | When compared to plain activated carbon, the Ag composites’ antibacterial activity was significantly higher. | [ | |
| 6 | Silver nano-coatings on cotton gauzes | 100–300 nm |
| HaCaT/3T3 | The developed textile materials show promise as an alternative to traditional wound dressings due to their antimicrobial properties and biocompatibility. | [ |
| 7 | Polyurethane Foam mixed Ag-NPs Dressing | 100 | Human fibroblast | Wound healing was enhanced by the use of the foam dressing. | [ | |
| 8 | AgNP gelatin hydrogel pads | 7.7–10.8 nm | Human’s normal skin fibroblasts | Gelatin hydrogel pads infused with silver nanoparticles have shown promise as antibacterial wound dressings. | [ | |
| 9 | Chitosan-PEG hydrogel | 75 | Rabbit | On day 14, the dermal layer of skin and the collagen pattern were both healthy in the Ag-NPs impregnated chitosan-PEG hydrogel group. | [ | |
| 10 | AgNPs incorporated Pluronic F127 and Pluronic F68 thermosensitive gel | - | - | Gel may disrupt the structure of bacterial cell membranes, allowing the substance to enter the cell, where it can condense DNA, combine and coagulate with the cytoplasm, and ultimately kill the bacteria by causing the cytoplasmic component to leak out. | [ | |
| 11 | Chitosan nanofiber | 25 |
| Wistar Hannover rats | Biological media had a substantial impact on the release of silver; proteins blocked the release of the metal, whereas inorganic ions slowed it down. As a result, to elicit in vivo antibacterial activities, a high concentration of AgNPs was required. | [ |
| 12 | Asymmetric Wettable Chitosan nanocomposite | 25 | HEK293 cell line | The dressing has been shown to encourage cell growth in an in vitro cytocompatibility study. | [ | |
| 13 | Cellulose hydrogel | 5–50 | New Zealand rabbit | Three days faster wound healing was seen using nanohydrogel compared to the control group. | [ | |
| 14 | Chitosan gels | 15 |
| Human dermal fibroblasts | Chitosan gels containing AgNPs showed improvement in biocompatibility tests on primary fibroblasts. | [ |
| 15 | Silk fibroin/ carboxymethyl chitosan composite sponge | 4.9 ± 1.9 nm | - | This AgNP-loaded SF/CMC sponge shows promise as a potential antimicrobial wound dressing. | [ | |
| 16 | Chitosan cross-linked bilayer nanocomposite | 45 | L929 cell line | The treated group’s organized and developed epithelium was a marked improvement over that of the control group. | [ | |
| 17 | AgNPs/Bacterial cellulose composites | 10–30 nm | Epidermal cells | In vitro studies show that a nanostructured AgNP-BC gel-membrane has the potential to be an effective antimicrobial wound dressing with good biocompatibility for the expedited healing of scald wounds. | [ | |
| 18 | Silver NPs embedded bacterial cellulose gel membranes | 30 |
| Westar rats | A significant amount of healing (85.92%) occurred after 14 days of treatment. | [ |
| 19 | β-chitin-based hydrogels | 5 | ERO cell line | Manufactured scaffolds showed improved whole-blood clotting ability. | [ | |
| 20 | Silver Alginate/Nicotinamide Nanocomposites | 20–80 | Mice | Significant wound healing had occurred by the fourth day of treatment. | [ | |
| 21 | Hyaluronan Nanofiber | 25 | Cell line (NIH 3T3) | Since nanoparticles are so much smaller than typical particles, they are able to exert a far stronger effect on microbes. | [ | |
| 22 | Chitosan-Ag/ZnO composite dressing | 10–30 nm | Drug sensitive | BALB/c mice /L02 cells | These findings support the feasibility of using the prepared chitosan-Ag/ZnO composite dressing in wound care. | [ |
| 23 | Chitosan-based multifunctional hydrogel | 250 | Rat model | Following 14 days of therapy, the test organism showed the slowest rate of re-epithelialization. | [ |
Incorporation of silver nanoparticles into electrospun nanofibers for wound healing.
| S. No. | AgNPs | Solvents | Voltage, Distance, Flow Rate | Diameter (nm) | Antibacterial Efficiency (ZOI (mm), MIC or %) | Bio- | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kV) | (cm) | (mL/h) | |||||||
| 1 | PLA | Methylene chloride, DMF | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1.44 ± 0.32 μm | CjECs | [ | |
| 2 | PCL-Gelatin | Acetone | 15 | 15 | 1 | 830–920 | HDF | [ | |
| 3 | Polyurethane | THF | 15 | 15 | 0.5 | 200–2000 | CEFs | [ | |
| 4 | Gum Arabic-PVA-PCL | DMF | 18 | 15 | 0.5 | 150–250 | MEF | [ | |
| 5 | PCL-PVA | CHCl3, CH3OH, H2O | 27 | - | 3 | - | HDF | [ | |
| 6 | Polystyrene | DMF | 2–3 | - | 1–3 | 96–471 | - | [ | |
| 7 | Polyurethane | HFP | 17 | 20 | 1.5 | 500 | HaCaT | [ | |
| 8 | PVA-PCL | CHCl3, CH3OH, Water | 23 | 15 | 0.02 | 70 nm | NIH3T3 | [ | |
| 9 | PCL | water | 18 | 16 | 1 | 0.38 μm | HFB4 | [ | |
| 10 | PVA-TPU | Water: DMF | 25 | 10 | 1 | 230–280 | - | [ | |
| 11 | Chitosan- | Acetone | 20 | 14 | - | 100–300 | HDF | [ | |
| 12 | PCL-Cellulose acetate | Acetone: DCM | 22 | 16 | 1 | 2–6.3 μm | HOB, HFB4 | [ | |
| 13 | Collagen | HFIP | 18 | 10 | 25 mL/min | 300–700 | No toxic on rat skin | [ | |
| 14 | PLA-PVP | DCM | 20–30 | 15 | 2 | 500–650 | – | [ | |
| 15 | Cellulose acetate-PVAc | Acetone | 25 | 10 | 0.8 | 1.33 ± 0.63µm | CEFs | [ | |
Clinical transformation status of some silver nanoparticles-based products.
| S. No. | Study Title (ClinicalTrial Identifier ID) | Status of Clinical Trails |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Topical Application of Silver Nanoparticles and Oral Pathogens in Ill Patients (NCT02761525) | Completed |
| 2 | Topical Silver Nanoparticles for Microbial Activity (NCT03752424) | Unknown |
| 3 | Silver Nanoparticles in Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria (NCT04431440) | Completed |
| 4 | Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticle Gel Versus a Common Antibacterial Hand Gel (NCT00659204) | Unknown |
| 5 | P11-4 and Nanosilver Fluoride Varnish in Treatment of White Spot Carious Lesions (NCT04929509) | Recruiting |
| 6 | Evaluation of Diabetic Foot Wound Healing Using Hydrogel/ Nano Silver-based Dressing vs. Traditional Dressing (NCT04834245) | Completed |
Figure 9(a) ATR-FTIR spectra for the BSA functionalized PANGMA nanofibers in different hydration states (of dry and wet represented by the solid and dashed lines, respectively). (b) Schematic illustration of the capturing process of the metal nanoparticle by the swollen functionalized nanofibers). (c) SEM image shows uniform distribution of metal nanoparticles across the nanofibers. Reproduced with permission [160]. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH. (d) Camera image of a mussel stuck onto a polymeric surface along with a simple representation of the amine and catechol groups of the dopamine building block for surface coating. Reproduced with permission [164]. Copyright 2007, Science AAAS.
Figure 10(a) Representative photograph showing the antibacterial zones of E. coli growth inhibition by the different dressings. (b) Photographs show the wound healing process at different time points; images reproduced with permission from [168] ©2021 Materials Science & Engineering C. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 11XRD patterns of AgNPs and PCL/Gel-AgNPs. Images reproduced with permission from [168] ©2021 Materials Science & Engineering C. Published by Elsevier Ltd. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Figure 12XPS spectra of composite nanofiber: (A) full XPS spectrum of AgNPs/silica nanofiber and pure silica nanofiber, (B) Ag3d of AgNPs/silica nanofiber. Reproduced with permission [169]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 13FTIR spectra of the electrospun nanofibers: (I) PAN; (II) PAN/CNC/Ag; (III) PAN/CNC/Ag/Si; and (IV) p-PAN/CNC/Ag/Si. Reproduced from [170] Materials (MDPI).
Figure 14The SEM images of the electrospun membranes of (A) Ag0, (B) Ag1, and (C) Ag5 groups. (D) The TEM image of a single fiber from the Ag5 group, where the electron-dense areas were silver nanoparticles. In vitro interaction with PBS and FBS. (E) The SEM micro-images of membranes after being immersed in PBS and FBS. Scale bar: 1 μm; images reproduced with permission from [147] ©2019 Materials Science & Engineering C. Published by Elsevier Ltd.