| Literature DB >> 26843966 |
Shakeel Ahmed1, Mudasir Ahmad1, Babu Lal Swami1, Saiqa Ikram1.
Abstract
Metallic nanoparticles are being utilized in every phase of science along with engineering including medical fields and are still charming the scientists to explore new dimensions for their respective worth which is generally attributed to their corresponding small sizes. The up-and-coming researches have proven their antimicrobial significance. Among several noble metal nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles have attained a special focus. Conventionally silver nanoparticles are synthesized by chemical method using chemicals as reducing agents which later on become accountable for various biological risks due to their general toxicity; engendering the serious concern to develop environment friendly processes. Thus, to solve the objective; biological approaches are coming up to fill the void; for instance green syntheses using biological molecules derived from plant sources in the form of extracts exhibiting superiority over chemical and/or biological methods. These plant based biological molecules undergo highly controlled assembly for making them suitable for the metal nanoparticle syntheses. The present review explores the huge plant diversity to be utilized towards rapid and single step protocol preparatory method with green principles over the conventional ones and describes the antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Green synthesis; Plant extract; Silver nanoparticles
Year: 2015 PMID: 26843966 PMCID: PMC4703479 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2015.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 1Different approaches of synthesis of silver nanoparticles.
Fig. 2Protocols employed for synthesis of nanoparticles (a) bottom to top approach and (b) top to bottom approach.
Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by different researchers using plant extracts.
| Plants | Size (nm) | Plant’s part | Shape | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50–100 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 31.83 | Rhizome | Spherical | ||
| 25 | Whole plant | Spherical | ||
| 20–90 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 16–28 | Fruit | Spherical | ||
| 22 | Inflorescence | Spherical | ||
| 7–17 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 10–50 | Seeds | Spherical | ||
| 8–40 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 13 | Leaves | – | ||
| 32 | Leaves | – | ||
| 0.5 | Leaves | – | ||
| 10–30 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 19–45 | Plant | Spherical | ||
| 30–50 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 20–50 | Seeds | – | ||
| 100–110 | Seeds | – | ||
| 16.4 | Leaves | – | ||
| 10–20 | Leaves | – | ||
| 5 & 10–30 | Leaves | Spherical & fcc | ||
| 35 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| <60 | Leaves | – | ||
| 10–30 | Latex | Spherical | ||
| >80 | Leaves | – | ||
| 87, 99.8 | Seeds | |||
| 50 | Leaves | |||
| 20 | Peel | |||
| 57 | Leaves | |||
| 35 | Leaves | |||
| 35–60 | Leaves | Triangles, pentagons, hexagons | ||
| 25–80 | Leaves | Spherical, triangular | ||
| 20–30 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 4–22 | Leaves | Spherical | ||
| 50–350 | Leaves | Spherical, triangular | ||
| 10–35 | Peel | Spherical | ||
| 50–150 | Peel | |||
| 20–50 | Leaves | Triangular, circular, hexagonal | ||
| 25–80 | Leaves | Spherical, triangular | ||
| 16–40 | Leaves | Quasilinear superstructures | ||
| 25–50 | Leaves | |||
| 30–40 | Fruit |
Antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized using plant extracts.
| Biological entity | Test microorganisms | Method | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kirby-Bauer | |||
| Standard plate count | |||
| Disc diffusion | |||
| Disc diffusion | |||
| Disc diffusion for bacteria and food poisoning for fungi | |||
| Disc diffusion | |||
| Disc diffusion |
Fig. 3Protocol for synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extract.