| Literature DB >> 36235919 |
Junichiro Wada1,2, Kanae Wada1,3, Mona Gibreel1, Noriyuki Wakabayashi2, Tsutomu Iwamoto3, Pekka K Vallittu1,4, Lippo Lassila1.
Abstract
Although three-dimensional (3D) printing is clinically convenient to fabricate occlusal splints, it is still unclear how the post-curing method and the printer type can affect 3D-printed splints. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of stroboscopic post-curing at a nitrogen gas (N2) atmosphere versus post-curing in an air atmosphere, as well as the printer type (liquid crystal display (LCD) and digital light processing (DLP)) on the mechanical properties of a 3D-printed hard-type occlusal splint material. Flexural strength, flexural modulus, Vickers hardness number (VHN), fracture toughness, degree of double bond conversion (DC), 3D microlayer structure, water sorption, and water solubility were evaluated. The post-curing method significantly affected all evaluated properties except fracture toughness and 3D microlayer structure, while the printer type significantly affected all evaluated properties except flexural strength and flexural modulus. VHN and DC were significantly higher, and the smoother surface was noticeably obtained when printed by LCD printer and post-cured at an N2 atmosphere. The current results suggested that the post-curing method and the printer type would play a role in the mechanical properties of the evaluated material and that the combination of post-curing at an N2 atmosphere and LCD printer could enhance its mechanical properties and surface smoothness.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; degree of double bond conversion; mechanical property; microlayer structure; nitrogen gas; occlusal splint; post-curing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235919 PMCID: PMC9571503 DOI: 10.3390/polym14193971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1The printing direction (black arrow) and evaluated region for Vickers hardness number (VHN) and three-dimensional (3D) microlayer structure.
p values of multiple-way ANOVA statistical analysis for the evaluated mechanical properties.
| Variable | Flexural Strength | Flexural Modulus | Vickers Hardness Number (VHN) | Fracture Toughness | Degree of Double Bond Conversion (DC) | Three-Dimensional (3D) Microlayer Structure | Water Sorption | Water Solubility | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Length | Height | ||||||||
| Post-curing method | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.069 | <0.001 | 0.335 | 0.127 | 0.907 | <0.001 | 0.968 |
| Printer type | 0.323 | 0.220 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Aging in boiling water | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
p < 0.05 is significant.
Mean value and standard deviation of flexural strength, flexural modulus, ratio of broken specimens during three-point bending test, VHN, and fracture toughness, and results of one-way ANOVA statistical analysis and Chi-squared test.
| Printer Type | Post-Curing | Aging in BW | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Flexural Modulus (GPa) | Broken Specimens (%) | VHN | Fracture Toughness (MPa m1/2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | # | ## | # | # | ||||||||
| Creo | SS | - | 92.5 ± 3.1 | ac | 2.21 ± 0.11 | acd | 30 | a | 12.5 ± 0.4 | abf | 2.22 ± 0.13 | ac |
| + | 66.3 ± 3.2 | b | 1.70 ± 0.14 | be | 40 | ab | 12.1 ± 0.4 | abd | 0.70 ± 0.06 | bg | ||
| SS + N2 | - | 90.6 ± 4.0 | c | 2.13 ± 0.13 | ac | 60 | ab | 15.7 ± 0.5 | c | 2.28 ± 0.12 | acf | |
| + | 80.5 ± 1.5 | d | 2.11 ± 0.07 | ac | 40 | ab | 15.3 ± 0.5 | c | 0.69 ± 0.05 | bg | ||
| Asiga | SS | - | 92.1 ± 2.8 | ac | 2.30 ± 0.09 | ad | 0 | a | 11.8 ± 0.6 | bd | 2.59 ± 0.11 | d |
| + | 73.6 ± 1.8 | e | 1.79 ± 0.05 | bef | 100 | b | 11.6 ± 0.4 | d | 0.85 ± 0.05 | eg | ||
| SS + N2 | - | 92.8 ± 1.8 | ac | 2.32 ± 0.10 | ad | 0 | a | 13.3 ± 0.5 | e | 2.39 ± 0.13 | cf | |
| + | 73.8 ± 1.5 | e | 1.86 ± 0.06 | ef | 100 | b | 12.8 ± 0.5 | af | 0.83 ± 0.05 | beg | ||
SS: stroboscope; N2: nitrogen gas; VHN: Vickers hardness number; and BW: boiling water. -: Without aging (non-aged group); and +: with aging (aged group). # Same superscripted letters indicate groups not statistically significantly different when compared by one-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis with Tukey multiple comparisons (p > 0.05). ## Same superscripted letters indicate groups not statistically significantly different when compared by Chi-squared test and Bonferroni correction (p > 0.05).
Figure 2Typical load deflection curve for each group. Note that all specimens are broken in aged Asiga subgroups while no specimen are broken in non-aged Asiga subgroups, and a positive effect of the post-curing at a nitrogen gas (N2) atmosphere is found only in aged Creo subgroups.
Mean value and standard deviation of DC, 3D microlayer structure, water sorption, and water solubility, and the results of one-way ANOVA statistical analysis.
| Printer Type | Post-Curing Method | DC (%) | 3D Microlayer Structure (μm) | Water Sorption (%) | Water Solubility (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Length | Height | |||||||||||
| Creo | SS | 64.7 ± 6.4 | a | 51.2 ± 0.4 | a | 97.7 ± 0.3 | a | 7.5 ± 1.2 | a | 1.685 ± 0.004 | a | 0.495 ± 0.020 | a |
| SS + N2 | 92.3 ± 4.5 | b | 51.3 ± 0.3 | a | 97.6 ± 0.4 | a | 7.3 ± 1.5 | a | 1.696 ± 0.006 | b | 0.496 ± 0.036 | a | |
| Asiga | SS | 56.7 ± 6.2 | a | 62.0 ± 0.5 | b | 100.6 ± 1.3 | b | 13.4 ± 0.8 | b | 1.664 ± 0.003 | c | 0.383 ± 0.006 | b |
| SS + N2 | 75.4 ± 4.5 | c | 62.3 ± 0.7 | b | 99.7 ± 1.5 | b | 13.7 ± 1.0 | b | 1.675 ± 0.009 | d | 0.379 ± 0.024 | b | |
DC: Degree of double bond conversion; SS: stroboscope; and N2: nitrogen gas. Same superscripted letters indicate groups not statistically significantly different when compared by one-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis with Tukey multiple comparisons (p > 0.05).
Figure 33D surface images of typical specimens obtained by the optical profilometer. Note the shallower grooves between microstructures in the Creo specimen post-cured at an N2 atmosphere compared to other specimens.
Figure 4Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images (×500 at 15kV) of microlayer structures on the surface of typical specimens. Note the smoother surface on the Creo specimen post-cured at an N2 atmosphere compared to other specimens.
Figure 5The representative plots of mass changes (%) against time during the water immersion and the second drying procedure. Note the saturation 14 days after water immersion and completion of drying 20 days after drying began in all groups.