Literature DB >> 17174388

Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions.

Mutlu Ozcan1, Silvia Helena Barbosa, Renata Marques Melo, Graziela Avila Prado Galhano, Marco Antonio Bottino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of two different surface conditioning methods on the repair bond strength of a bis-GMA-adduct/bis-EMA/TEGDMA based resin composite after three aging conditions.
METHODS: Thirty-six composite resin blocks (Esthet X, Dentsply) were prepared (5 mm x 6 mm x 6 mm) and randomly assigned into three groups for aging process: (a) immersion in citric acid (pH 3.0 at 37 degrees C, 1 week) (CA); (b) boiling in water for 8h (BW) and (c) thermocycling (x5000, 5-55 degrees C, dwell time: 30s) (TC). After aging, the blocks were assigned to one of the following surface conditioning methods: (1) silica coating (30 microm SiO(x)) (CoJet, 3M ESPE)+silane (ESPE-Sil) (CJ), (2) phosphoric acid+adhesive resin (Single Bond, 3M ESPE) (PA). Resin composite (Esthet.X) was bonded to the conditioned substrates incrementally and light polymerized. The experimental groups formed were as follows: Gr1:CA+PA; Gr2:CA+CJ; Gr3:BW+PA; Gr4: BW+CJ; Gr5:TC+PA; Gr6: TC+CJ. The specimens were sectioned in two axes (x and y) with a diamond disc under coolant irrigation in order to obtain non-trimmed bar specimens (sticks, 10 mm x 1 mm x 1 mm) with 1 mm(2) of bonding area. The microtensile test was accomplished in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 0.5 mm min(-1)).
RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of bond strength (MPa+/-S.D.) per group were as follows: Gr1: 25.5+/-10.3; Gr2: 46.3+/-10.1; Gr3: 21.7+/-7.1; Gr4: 52.3+/-15.1; Gr5: 16.1+/-5.1; Gr6, 49.6+/-13.5. The silica coated groups showed significantly higher mean bond values after all three aging conditions (p<0.0001) (two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, alpha=0.05). The interaction effect revealed significant influence of TC aging on both silica coated and acid etched groups compared to the other aging methods (p<0.032). Citric acid was the least aggressive aging medium. SIGNIFICANCE: Chairside silica coating and silanization provided higher resin-resin bond strength values compared to acid etching with phosphoric acid followed by adhesive resin applications. Thermocycling the composite substrates resulted in the lowest repair bond strength compared to citric acid challenge or boiling in water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17174388     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  50 in total

1.  Effect of sonic-activated resin composites on the repair of aged substrates: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Marie-Thérèse Oberthür
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers.

Authors:  Annette Wiegand; Lukas Stucki; Robin Hoffmann; Thomas Attin; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin.

Authors:  Özden Özel Bektas; Digdem Eren; Seyda Herguner Siso; Gulsah E Akin
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months.

Authors:  Marco M M Gresnigt; Warner Kalk; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite.

Authors:  Jana Peterson; Marta Rizk; Monika Hoch; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Influence of caries infiltrant contamination on shear bond strength of different adhesives to dentin.

Authors:  Liuhe Jia; Bogna Stawarczyk; Patrick R Schmidlin; Thomas Attin; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Repair of dental resin-based composites.

Authors:  Veronika Baur; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins.

Authors:  Margareta Rinastiti; Mutlu Özcan; Widowati Siswomihardjo; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Effect of Various Laser Surface Treatments on Repair Shear Bond Strength of Aged Silorane-Based Composite.

Authors:  Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee; Siavash Savadi Oskoee; Sahand Rikhtegaran; Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar; Sarah Gholizadeh; Yasaman Aleyasin; Shahin Kasrae
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-27

10.  Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing.

Authors:  Mutlu Özcan; Pedro Henrique Corazza; Susana Maria Salazar Marocho; Silvia Helena Barbosa; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.