Literature DB >> 22119539

The future of dental devices is digital.

Richard van Noort1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Major changes are taking place in dental laboratories as a result of new digital technologies. Our aim is to provide an overview of these changes. In this article the reader will be introduced to the range of layered fabrication technologies and suggestions are made how these might be used in dentistry.
METHODS: Key publications in English from the past two decades are surveyed.
RESULTS: The first digital revolution took place many years ago now with the production of dental restorations such as veneers, inlays, crowns and bridges using dental CAD-CAM systems and new improved systems appear on the market with great rapidity. The reducing cost of processing power will ensure that these developments will continue as exemplified by the recent introduction of a new range of digital intra-oral scanners. With regard to the manufacture of prostheses this is currently dominated by subtractive machining technology but it is inevitable that the additive processing routes of layered fabrication, such as FDM, SLA, SLM and inkjet printing, will start to have an impact. In principle there is no reason why the technology cannot be extended to all aspects of production of dental prostheses and include customized implants, full denture construction and orthodontic appliances. In fact anything that you might expect a dental laboratory to produce can be done digitally and potentially more consistently, quicker and at a reduced cost. SIGNIFICANCE: Dental device manufacturing will experience a second revolution when layered fabrication techniques reach the point of being able to produce high quality dental prostheses. The challenge for the dental materials research community is to marry the technology with materials that are suitable for use in dentistry. This can potentially take dental materials research in a totally different direction.
Copyright © 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119539     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  131 in total

1.  Three-dimensional printed millifluidic devices for zebrafish embryo tests.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Joanna Skommer; Niall P Macdonald; Timo Friedrich; Jan Kaslin; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics.

Authors:  Maximilian Kollmuss; Stefan Kist; Julia Eliette Goeke; Reinhard Hickel; Karin Christine Huth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Revolutionizing restorative dentistry: an overview.

Authors:  D R Prithviraj; Harleen Kaur Bhalla; Richa Vashisht; K Sounderraj; Shruthi Prithvi
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-02-05

4.  The introduction of digital dental technology into BDS curricula.

Authors:  C Chatham; M H Spencer; D J Wood; A Johnson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 5.  Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications.

Authors:  N D Ruse; M J Sadoun
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability.

Authors:  O Schubert; J Schweiger; M Stimmelmayr; E Nold; J-F Güth
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Custom-made, selective laser sintering (SLS) blade implants as a non-conventional solution for the prosthetic rehabilitation of extremely atrophied posterior mandible.

Authors:  F Mangano; M Bazzoli; L Tettamanti; D Farronato; M Maineri; A Macchi; C Mangano
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Bone ingrowth potential of electron beam and selective laser melting produced trabecular-like implant surfaces with and without a biomimetic coating.

Authors:  J E Biemond; G Hannink; N Verdonschot; P Buma
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Mika Salmi; Kaija-Stiina Paloheimo; Jukka Tuomi; Tuula Ingman; Antti Mäkitie
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.

Authors:  Anthony Tahayeri; MaryCatherine Morgan; Ana P Fugolin; Despoina Bompolaki; Avathamsa Athirasala; Carmem S Pfeifer; Jack L Ferracane; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.