| Literature DB >> 36235132 |
Guangxu Xing1, Xuefeng Sun1, Ning Li2, Xuewu Li1, Tiantian Wu2, Fangyu Wang1.
Abstract
With the continuous development of China's economy and society, people and the government have higher and higher requirements for food safety. Testing for food dopants and toxins can prevent the occurrence of various adverse health phenomena in the world's population. By deploying new and powerful sensors that enable rapid sensing processes, the food industry can help detect trace adulteration and toxic substances. At present, as a common food safety detection method, lateral flow immunochromatography (LFI) is widely used in food safety testing, environmental testing and clinical medical treatment because of its advantages of simplicity, speed, specificity and low cost, and plays a pivotal role in ensuring food safety. This paper mainly focuses on the application of lateral flow immunochromatography and new technologies combined with test strips in food safety detection, such as aptamers, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, quantum dots, electrochemical test strip detection technology, biosensor test strip detection, etc. In addition, sensing principles such as fluorescence resonance energy transfer can also more effective. Different methods have different characteristics. The following is a review of the application of these technologies in food safety detection.Entities:
Keywords: FRET; LFI; QDs; SERS; aptamer; biosensors; electrochemical sensors
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235132 PMCID: PMC9571384 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1One of the detection principles of LFI–FRET.
Figure 2The detection technology of LFI–Aptamer.
Figure 3The detection technology of LFI–SERS.
Figure 4The detection technology of LFI–QDs.
Figure 5The detection technology of LFI–Electrochemical sensor.
Figure 6The detection technology of LFI–Biosensor.
Literature summary on LFI.
| Type of Detection | Analyte | LOD | Analyzed Samples | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRET | Hg2+ | 0.309 μg/L | water, skin whitening serum | [ |
| FRET | HSO3− | 45 nM | cell | [ |
| FRET | Hematoxin A | 0.64 ng/mL | coffee | [ |
| Aptamer | Rongalite | 1 μg/mL | food | [ |
| Aptamer | aflatoxin B | 0.16ng/mL | almonds, peanuts, dried figs | [ |
| Aptamer | Hematoxin A | 3.46 ng/mL | corn | [ |
| SERS | β-Conglycinin | 1 μg/mL | Skimmed milk | [ |
| SERS | antibiotics | 0.216 pg/mL | milk | [ |
| SERS | Cadaverine, putrescine | 76.99 and 115.88 μg/mL | spoiled pork, beef, chicken | [ |
| SERS | S.typhimurium | 35 cfu/mL | milk | [ |
| SERS | C reactive protein | 0.01 and 0.1 ng/mL | [ | |
| QDs | antibiotics | 0.3, 0.12, 0.2 ng/mL | milk | [ |
| QDs | ochratoxin A | 1.9 ng/mL | Red win | [ |
| QDs | ciprofloxacin | 0.05 ng/mL | fish | [ |
| QDs | fumonisins | 2.8 µg/L | corn | [ |
| Electrochemical sensor |
| 13.5 μg/mL | cucumber | [ |
| Electrochemical sensor | C-reactive protein | 1.6 ng/mL | human serum | [ |
| Electrochemical sensor | glucose | 25 μM | human sweat and blood shows | [ |
| Electrochemical sensor | acetylcholinesterase | 0.1 U/mL | blood | [ |
| Biosensor | foodborne pathogens | 10–50 CFU/mL | spinach, ground beef and chicken homogenates | [ |
| Biosensor | odorant-binding protein | 100 mg/L | water | [ |
| Biosensor | [Arg4]-microcystins | 12.5 ng/L | water | [ |
| Biosensor | Vitamin B12 | 1 ng/mL | energy drinks | [ |
| Biosensor | 3-methyl-quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid | 1.4 µg/kg and 2.7 µg/kg | swine muscle and liver | [ |
| Biosensor | glucose and fructose | 5.67 × 10−4 and 2.9 × 10−3 | honey | [ |
| Biosensor | 12.3 fg/μL | horse meat | [ | |
| Biosensor | Melamine | 2.5 mg/L | [ |