| Literature DB >> 32698395 |
Juan Pedro Rojas-Armas1, Jorge Luis Arroyo-Acevedo1, Miriam Palomino-Pacheco2, Oscar Herrera-Calderón3, José Manuel Ortiz-Sánchez4, Agustín Rojas-Armas5, James Calva6, Américo Castro-Luna7, Julio Hilario-Vargas8.
Abstract
C. citratus essential oil and carvacrol have shown an antitumor effect on breast tumor cell lines; the main objective of this research was to evaluate the antitumor effect of the essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus (EOCc) and carvacrol on 7,12-dimethylbenz [a] anthracene (DMBA)-induced breast cancer in female rats. Cancer was induced by a single administration of DMBA at dose of 80 mg/kg body weight (BW). A total of 54 female Holtzman rats were randomly assigned into 9 groups (n = 6). Group I: PS (Physiological saline); Group II: DMBA; Groups III, IV, and V: DMBA + EOCc at doses of 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg/day BW, respectively; Groups VI, VII, and VIII: DMBA + carvacrol at doses of 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg/day BW, respectively; and group IX: DMBA + EOCc + carvacrol at doses of 100 mg/kg/day BW. The treatment lasted 14 weeks. As results, EOCc showed a reduction in tumors as well as necrosis and mitosis. Animals treated with carvacrol did not show necrosis, mitosis, or infiltration. Carvacrol at dose of 100 mg/kg/day BW revealed a significant decrease in the cumulative tumor volume down to 0.11 ± 0.05 cm3 compared to 0.38 ± 0.04 cm3 of the DMBA group (p < 0.01). It is concluded that EOCc and carvacrol had an antitumor effect on DMBA-induced breast cancer in female rats.Entities:
Keywords: Cymbopogon citratus; breast cancer; cancer experimental; carcinogenic agent; carvacrol; essential oil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32698395 PMCID: PMC7397214 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25143284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Chemical composition of the essential oil of C. citratus determined by GC-MS.
| Compounds | LRIexp | LRIref | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not identified | 983 | 0.61 | |
| 2 | Myrcene | 988 | 988 | 13.60 |
| 3 | Limonene | 1027 | 1024 | 0.25 |
| 4 | 1,8-Cineole | 1031 | 1026 | 0.29 |
| 5 | ( | 1034 | 1032 | 0.63 |
| 6 | ( | 1045 | 1044 | 0.37 |
| 7 | 6,7-Epoxymyrcene | 1090 | 1090 | 0.22 |
| 8 | Linalool | 1099 | 1095 | 1.01 |
| 9 | exo-Isocitral | 1142 | 1140 | 0.34 |
| 10 | trans-α-Necrodol | 1147 | 1144 | 0.17 |
| 11 | Citronellal | 1151 | 1148 | 0.19 |
| 12 | ( | 1160 | 1160 | 1.66 |
| 13 | ( | 1179 | 1177 | 2.42 |
| 14 | Nerol | 1224 | 1227 | 0.45 |
| 15 | Citronellol | 1227 | 1223 | 0.24 |
| 16 | Neral | 1239 | 1235 | 31.84 |
| 17 | Geraniol | 1250 | 1249 | 2.91 |
| 18 | Geranial | 1270 | 1264 | 40.45 |
| 19 | 2-Undecanone | 1291 | 1293 | 0.73 |
| 20 | Not identified | 1332 | 0.17 | |
| 21 | Ethyl nerolate | 1350 | 1351 | 0.25 |
| 22 | Not identified | 1368 | 0.20 | |
| 23 | ( | 1415 | 1417 | 0.19 |
| 24 | 2-Tridecanone | 1493 | 1495 | 0.57 |
| 25 | Myristicin | 1515 | 1517 | 0.26 |
| Monoterpene hydrocarbons (%) | 14.85 | |||
| Oxygenated monoterpenes (%) | 82.17 | |||
| Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (%) | 0.76 | |||
| Others (%) | 1.23 | |||
| Total Identified (%) | 99.02 | |||
LRIexp, Linear Retention Index calculated against n-alkanes C9-C24; LRIref, Linear Retention Index obtained from the literature (Adams 2009) [30].
Figure 1GC-MS Chromatogram for Cymbopogon citratus essential oil. Each number corresponds to a chemical constituent found in EOCc detailed in Table 1.
Figure 2Antioxidant activity by the DPPH of Cymbopogon citratus essential oil and carvacrol. All tests were run in three independent experiments (n = 3) and results expressed as mean values with standard deviation (±SD).
Effect of the essential oil of C. citratus and carvacrol on DMBA induced breast carcinogenesis in rats.
| Parameter/Groups | DMBA | DMBA + EOCc50 | DMBA + EOCc100 | DMBA + EOCc200 | DMBA + CARV-50 | DMBA + CARV-100 | DMBA + CARV-200 | DMBA + EOCc100 CARV-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of tumors | 16.00 | 11.00 | 10.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 4.00 * | 9.00 | 7.00 |
| Animals with tumors/total of animals | 6/6 | 4/6 | 5/6 | 5/6 | 4/6 | 2/6 | 5/6 | 4/6 |
| Frequency of tumors per group | 2.67 ± 0.33 | 1.83 ± 0.65 (−31%) | 1.67 ± 0.42 (−37%) | 1.50 ± 0.43 (−44%) | 1.50 ± 0.62 (−44%) | 0.67 ± 0.49 * (−75%) | 1.50 ± 0.43 (−44%) | 1.17 ± 0.31 (−56%) |
| Tumor latency (days) | 65.17 ± 2.78 | 71.00 ± 5.11 | 75.40 ± 3.12 | 76.20 ± 3.06 | 72.50 ± 4.17 | 79.00 ± 7.00 | 76.60 ± 3.08 | 77.25 ± 3.66 |
| Tumor incidence (%) | 100.00 | 66.67 (−33%) | 83.33 (−17%) | 83.33 (−17%) | 66.67 (−33%) | 33.33 (−67%) | 83.33 (−17%) | 66.67 (−33%) |
| Average tumor volume (cm3) | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.05 * | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.03 |
| Cumulative tumor volume (cm3) | 6.10 ± 0.05 | 3.64 ± 0.10 | 3.21 ± 0.15 | 2.72 ± 0.05 | 2.53 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.01 * | 2.18 ± 0.02 | 1.62 ± 0.01 * |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. EOCc; essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus, CARV; carvacrol. * Significant difference from the DMBA group (p < 0.05). One-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey test.
Figure 3Variation of the cumulative tumor volume as a result of treatment with EOCc and carvacrol in breast carcinogenesis induced by DMBA in rats. * Significant difference from the DMBA group (p < 0.001). One-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey test.
Figure 4Variation of body weight in rats with DMBA-induced breast cancer and treated with EOCc and carvacrol for 14 weeks. Each point represents ± SEM of six animals. Significant difference from the DMBA group at 8 weeks (p < 0.05). One-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc (brown narrow).
Effect of the essential oil of C. citratus and carvacrol on histological parameters in DMBA-induced breast carcinogenesis in rats.
| Histological Parameters | DMBA | DMBA + EOCc50 | DMBA + EOCc100 | DMBA + EOCc200 | DMBA + CARV-50 | DMBA + CARV-100 | DMBA + CARV-200 | DMBA + EOCc100 CARV-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Necrosis (%) | 75.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Mitosis | 1–2 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0 | 3–5 | 0–1 |
| Infiltration | positive | positive, muscle | positive, adipose tissue | positive, muscle | positive, adipose tissue | negative | negative | positive, adipose tissue |
Figure 5Histopathological profiles (H&E, × 400) of representative mammary tumor tissues from various experimental rat groups (n = 6). (A) The normal breast tissue of the control group: mammary acini (red narrows), conduit excretory (green narrows), breast stroma (blue narrow), adipose tissue (yellow narrow). (B) DMBA group; infiltrating carcinoma with extensive tumor necrosis (black narrow). (C) EOCc-50 mg/kg/day + DMBA; solid-cribriform carcinoma, infiltrating, with necrosis areas (black narrows). (D) EOCc-100 mg/kg/day + DMBA, solid infiltrating carcinoma with necrosis area (black narrow). (E) EOCc-200 mg/kg/day + DMBA; solid carcinoma with “papillary” areas and infiltrating adipose tissue (black narrows). (F) Carvacrol-100 mg/kg/day + DMBA; solid infiltrating carcinoma, necrosis tumor necrosis (black narrow) and infiltrating adipose tissue (yellow narrows). (G) Carvacrol-200 mg/kg/day + DMBA; solid carcinoma infiltrating adipose tissue (yellow narrows). (H) EOCc 100 + carvacrol 100 mg/kg/day + DMBA; solid carcinoma (red narrows), necrosis (black narrow), tubular areas (brown narrows).