Julian Scheper1,2, Laura S Hildebrand1,2, Eva-Maria Faulhaber1,2, Lisa Deloch1,2,3, Udo S Gaipl1,2,3, Julia Symank1, Rainer Fietkau1,2, Luitpold V Distel1,2, Markus Hecht1,2, Tina Jost4,5,6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Translational Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. tina.jost@uk-erlangen.de. 5. Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany. tina.jost@uk-erlangen.de. 6. Translational Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. tina.jost@uk-erlangen.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite new treatment options, melanoma continues to have an unfavorable prognosis. DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors are a promising drug class, especially in combination with chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT). Manipulating DNA damage repair during RT is an opportunity to exploit the genomic instability of cancer cells and may lead to radiosensitizing effects in tumors that could improve cancer therapy. METHODS: A panel of melanoma-derived cell lines of different origin were used to investigate toxicity-related clonogenic survival, cell death, and cell cycle distribution after treatment with a kinase inhibitor (KI) against ATM (AZD0156) or ATR (VE-822, berzosertib), irradiation with 2 Gy, or a combination of KI plus ionizing radiation (IR). Two fibroblast cell lines generated from healthy skin tissue were used as controls. RESULTS: Clonogenic survival indicated a clear radiosensitizing effect of the ATM inhibitor (ATMi) AZD0156 in all melanoma cells in a synergistic manner, but not in healthy tissue fibroblasts. In contrast, the ATR inhibitor (ATRi) VE-822 led to additive enhancement of IR-related toxicity in most of the melanoma cells. Both inhibitors mainly increased cell death induction in combination with IR. In healthy fibroblasts, VE-822 plus IR led to higher cell death rates compared to AZD0156. A significant G2/M block was particularly induced in cancer cells when combining AZD0156 with IR. CONCLUSION: ATMi, in contrast to ATRi, resulted in synergistic radiosensitization regarding colony formation in melanoma cancer cells, while healthy tissue fibroblasts were merely affected with respect to cell death induction. In connection with an increased number of melanoma cells in the G2/M phase after ATMi plus IR treatment, ATMi seems to be superior to ATRi in melanoma cancer cell treatments when combined with RT.
PURPOSE: Despite new treatment options, melanoma continues to have an unfavorable prognosis. DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors are a promising drug class, especially in combination with chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT). Manipulating DNA damage repair during RT is an opportunity to exploit the genomic instability of cancer cells and may lead to radiosensitizing effects in tumors that could improve cancer therapy. METHODS: A panel of melanoma-derived cell lines of different origin were used to investigate toxicity-related clonogenic survival, cell death, and cell cycle distribution after treatment with a kinase inhibitor (KI) against ATM (AZD0156) or ATR (VE-822, berzosertib), irradiation with 2 Gy, or a combination of KI plus ionizing radiation (IR). Two fibroblast cell lines generated from healthy skin tissue were used as controls. RESULTS: Clonogenic survival indicated a clear radiosensitizing effect of the ATM inhibitor (ATMi) AZD0156 in all melanoma cells in a synergistic manner, but not in healthy tissue fibroblasts. In contrast, the ATR inhibitor (ATRi) VE-822 led to additive enhancement of IR-related toxicity in most of the melanoma cells. Both inhibitors mainly increased cell death induction in combination with IR. In healthy fibroblasts, VE-822 plus IR led to higher cell death rates compared to AZD0156. A significant G2/M block was particularly induced in cancer cells when combining AZD0156 with IR. CONCLUSION: ATMi, in contrast to ATRi, resulted in synergistic radiosensitization regarding colony formation in melanoma cancer cells, while healthy tissue fibroblasts were merely affected with respect to cell death induction. In connection with an increased number of melanoma cells in the G2/M phase after ATMi plus IR treatment, ATMi seems to be superior to ATRi in melanoma cancer cell treatments when combined with RT.
Authors: Dirk Schadendorf; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Carola Berking; Klaus G Griewank; Ralf Gutzmer; Axel Hauschild; Andreas Stang; Alexander Roesch; Selma Ugurel Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lucy C Riches; Antonio G Trinidad; Gareth Hughes; Gemma N Jones; Adina M Hughes; Andrew G Thomason; Paul Gavine; Andy Cui; Stephanie Ling; Jonathan Stott; Roger Clark; Samantha Peel; Pendeep Gill; Louise M Goodwin; Aaron Smith; Kurt G Pike; Bernard Barlaam; Martin Pass; Mark J O'Connor; Graeme Smith; Elaine B Cadogan Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: M Hecht; L Zimmer; C Loquai; C Weishaupt; R Gutzmer; B Schuster; S Gleisner; B Schulze; S M Goldinger; C Berking; A Forschner; P Clemens; G Grabenbauer; T Müller-Brenne; J Bauch; H T Eich; S Grabbe; D Schadendorf; G Schuler; P Keikavoussi; S Semrau; R Fietkau; L V Distel; L Heinzerling Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Mudit Chowdhary; Kirtesh R Patel; Hasan H Danish; David H Lawson; Mohammad K Khan Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Markus Hecht; Friedegund Meier; Lisa Zimmer; Bülent Polat; Carmen Loquai; Carsten Weishaupt; Andrea Forschner; Ralf Gutzmer; Jochen S Utikal; Simone M Goldinger; Michael Geier; Jessica C Hassel; Panagiotis Balermpas; Felix Kiecker; Ricarda Rauschenberg; Ursula Dietrich; Patrick Clemens; Carola Berking; Gerhard Grabenbauer; Dirk Schadendorf; Stephan Grabbe; Gerold Schuler; Rainer Fietkau; Luitpold V Distel; Lucie Heinzerling Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Massimo Ralli; Andrea Botticelli; Irene Claudia Visconti; Diletta Angeletti; Marco Fiore; Paolo Marchetti; Alessandro Lambiase; Marco de Vincentiis; Antonio Greco Journal: J Immunol Res Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 4.818