BACKGROUND: Palliative radiotherapy is often required for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma in the case of bone or brain metastases. Since BRAF inhibitor therapy is highly efficient in V600-mutated melanomas, there is hesitation to stop it during radiotherapy. Consequently, radiotherapy under simultaneous vemurafenib treatment is frequently needed. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient receiving palliative radiotherapy of spinal bone metastases before and during vemurafenib therapy. The skin reactions were quantitatively scored using computer-assisted digital image evaluation. RESULTS: Radiotherapy without vemurafenib was tolerated very well, whereas radiotherapy under simultaneous vemurafenib treatment resulted in accentuated skin reactions. Furthermore, the patient developed dysphagia and had to be hospitalized for parenteral nutrition. In the quantitative analysis, there was a twofold increase in pigmentation and erythema of the irradiated skin area of the thoracic spine when vemurafenib was combined with radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy treatment alone. This is the first reported case of a patient showing no complications during radiotherapy without vemurafenib but remarkable skin and mucosal toxicity under concurrent vemurafenib therapy. Thus, a genetically conditioned individually elevated radiosensitivity can definitely be excluded. Compared with other reported cases, radiosensitization was not limited to the skin, but also affected the esophageal mucosa. CONCLUSION: Vemurafenib is a strong radiosensitizer. Patients receiving radiotherapy under simultaneous vemurafenib treatment should be monitored very closely.
BACKGROUND: Palliative radiotherapy is often required for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma in the case of bone or brain metastases. Since BRAF inhibitor therapy is highly efficient in V600-mutated melanomas, there is hesitation to stop it during radiotherapy. Consequently, radiotherapy under simultaneous vemurafenib treatment is frequently needed. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient receiving palliative radiotherapy of spinal bone metastases before and during vemurafenib therapy. The skin reactions were quantitatively scored using computer-assisted digital image evaluation. RESULTS: Radiotherapy without vemurafenib was tolerated very well, whereas radiotherapy under simultaneous vemurafenib treatment resulted in accentuated skin reactions. Furthermore, the patient developed dysphagia and had to be hospitalized for parenteral nutrition. In the quantitative analysis, there was a twofold increase in pigmentation and erythema of the irradiated skin area of the thoracic spine when vemurafenib was combined with radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy treatment alone. This is the first reported case of a patient showing no complications during radiotherapy without vemurafenib but remarkable skin and mucosal toxicity under concurrent vemurafenib therapy. Thus, a genetically conditioned individually elevated radiosensitivity can definitely be excluded. Compared with other reported cases, radiosensitization was not limited to the skin, but also affected the esophageal mucosa. CONCLUSION:Vemurafenib is a strong radiosensitizer. Patients receiving radiotherapy under simultaneous vemurafenib treatment should be monitored very closely.
Authors: Christopher J Anker; Antoni Ribas; Allie H Grossmann; Xinjian Chen; Krishna K Narra; Wallace Akerley; Robert H I Andtbacka; Robert Dirk Noyes; Dennis C Shrieve; Kenneth F Grossmann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Boussemart; E Routier; C Mateus; K Opletalova; G Sebille; N Kamsu-Kom; M Thomas; S Vagner; M Favre; G Tomasic; J Wechsler; L Lacroix; C Robert Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ashwatha Narayana; Maya Mathew; Moses Tam; Rajni Kannan; Kathleen M Madden; John G Golfinos; Erik C Parker; Patrick A Ott; Anna C Pavlick Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Eva Muñoz-Couselo; Jesús Soberino García; José Manuel Pérez-García; Vanesa Ortega Cebrián; Javier Cortés Castán Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2015-09
Authors: Julian Scheper; Laura S Hildebrand; Eva-Maria Faulhaber; Lisa Deloch; Udo S Gaipl; Julia Symank; Rainer Fietkau; Luitpold V Distel; Markus Hecht; Tina Jost Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Tina Dasgupta; Aleksandra K Olow; Xiaodong Yang; Rintaro Hashizume; Theodore P Nicolaides; Maxwell Tom; Yasuyuki Aoki; Mitchel S Berger; William A Weiss; Lukas J A Stalpers; Michael Prados; C David James; Sabine Mueller; Daphne A Haas-Kogan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Christopher J Anker; Kenneth F Grossmann; Michael B Atkins; Gita Suneja; Ahmad A Tarhini; John M Kirkwood Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tanja Eichkorn; Fabian Schunn; Sebastian Regnery; Rami El Shafie; Juliane Hörner-Rieber; Sebastian Adeberg; Klaus Herfarth; Jürgen Debus; Laila König Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2021-01-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Anja Derer; Martina Spiljar; Monika Bäumler; Markus Hecht; Rainer Fietkau; Benjamin Frey; Udo S Gaipl Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 7.561