Literature DB >> 25762352

Radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitor therapy-mechanism and frequency of toxicity in melanoma patients.

M Hecht1, L Zimmer2, C Loquai3, C Weishaupt4, R Gutzmer5, B Schuster1, S Gleisner1, B Schulze6, S M Goldinger7, C Berking8, A Forschner9, P Clemens10, G Grabenbauer11, T Müller-Brenne12, J Bauch13, H T Eich13, S Grabbe3, D Schadendorf2, G Schuler14, P Keikavoussi14, S Semrau1, R Fietkau1, L V Distel15, L Heinzerling14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that ionizing radiation may be associated with unexpected side-effects in melanoma patients treated with concomitant BRAF inhibitors. A large multicenter analysis was carried out to generate reliable safety data and elucidate the mechanism.
METHODS: A total of 161 melanoma patients from 11 European skin cancer centers were evaluated for acute and late toxicity, of whom 70 consecutive patients received 86 series of radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy. To further characterize and quantify a possible radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitors, blood samples of 35 melanoma patients were used for individual radiosensitivity testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization of chromosomal breaks after ex vivo irradiation.
RESULTS: With radiotherapy and concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy the rate of acute radiodermatitis ≥2° was 36% and follicular cystic proliferation was seen in 13% of all radiotherapies. Non-skin toxicities included hearing disorders (4%) and dysphagia (2%). Following whole-brain radiotherapy, rates of radiodermatitis ≥2° were 44% and 8% (P < 0.001) for patients with and without BRAF inhibitor therapy, respectively. Concomitant treatment with vemurafenib induced acute radiodermatitis ≥2° more frequently than treatment with dabrafenib (40% versus 26%, P = 0.07). In line with these findings, analysis of chromosomal breaks ex vivo indicated significantly increased radiosensitivity for patients under vemurafenib (P = 0.004) and for patients switched from vemurafenib to dabrafenib (P = 0.002), but not for patients on dabrafenib only. No toxicities were reported after stereotactic treatment.
CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy is feasible with an acceptable increase in toxicity. Vemurafenib is a more potent radiosensitizer than dabrafenib.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; dabrafenib; radiation; radiosensitization; radiotherapy; vemurafenib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25762352     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  40 in total

Review 1.  Cutaneous toxicities of new treatments for melanoma.

Authors:  A Boada; C Carrera; S Segura; H Collgros; P Pasquali; D Bodet; S Puig; J Malvehy
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  BRAF V600 Mutation and BRAF Kinase Inhibitors in Conjunction With Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Melanoma Metastases: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Panagiotis Mastorakos; Zhiyuan Xu; James Yu; Judith Hess; Jack Qian; Ajay Chatrath; Davis G Taylor; Douglas Kondziolka; Ronald Warnick; Veronica Chiang; Jason Sheehan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Impact on overall survival of the combination of BRAF inhibitors and stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

Authors:  Amparo Wolf; Sayyad Zia; Rashika Verma; Anna Pavlick; Melissa Wilson; John G Golfinos; Joshua S Silverman; Douglas Kondziolka
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Safety of radiosurgery concurrent with systemic therapy (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or immunotherapy) in brain metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Borius; Jean Régis; Alexandre Carpentier; Michel Kalamarides; Charles Ambroise Valery; Igor Latorzeff
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 9.264

5.  Survival advantage combining a BRAF inhibitor and radiation in BRAF V600E-mutant glioma.

Authors:  Tina Dasgupta; Aleksandra K Olow; Xiaodong Yang; Rintaro Hashizume; Theodore P Nicolaides; Maxwell Tom; Yasuyuki Aoki; Mitchel S Berger; William A Weiss; Lukas J A Stalpers; Michael Prados; C David James; Sabine Mueller; Daphne A Haas-Kogan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Controversies in the Therapy of Brain Metastases: Shifting Paradigms in an Era of Effective Systemic Therapy and Longer-Term Survivorship.

Authors:  Colette J Shen; Michael Lim; Lawrence R Kleinberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Avoiding Severe Toxicity From Combined BRAF Inhibitor and Radiation Treatment: Consensus Guidelines from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).

Authors:  Christopher J Anker; Kenneth F Grossmann; Michael B Atkins; Gita Suneja; Ahmad A Tarhini; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  [Melanoma brain metastases : Treatment options].

Authors:  R Rauschenberg; G Tabatabai; E G C Troost; M Garzarolli; S Beissert; F Meier
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 9.  Management of Dermatologic Complications of Lung Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Silvina B Pugliese; Joel W Neal; Bernice Y Kwong
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-10

10.  Neurological complications of new chemotherapy agents.

Authors:  Alicia M Zukas; David Schiff
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.