Literature DB >> 36219329

Clinical and radiological outcome 1-year after cervical total disc replacement using the Signus ROTAIO - Prosthesis.

Anna Lang1, Sara Lener2, Lukas Grassner2, Anto Abramovic2, Claudius Thomé2, Dennis Päsler3, Jens Lehmberg4, Ralph Schär5, Sebastian Hartmann2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The instantaneous center of rotation (iCOR) of a motion segment has been shown to correlate with its total range of motion (ROM). Importantly, a correlation of the correct placement of cervical total disc replacement (cTDR) to preserve a physiological iCOR has been previously identified. However, changes of these parameters and the corresponding clinical relevance have hardly been analyzed. This study assesses the radiological and clinical correlation of iCOR and ROM following cTDR. MATERIALS/
METHODS: A retrospective multi-center observational study was conducted and radiological as well as clinical parameters were evaluated preoperatively and 1 year after cTDR with an unconstrained device. Radiographic parameters including flexion/extension X-rays (flex/ex), ROM, iCOR and the implant position in anterior-posterior direction (IP ap), as well as corresponding clinical parameters [(Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the visual analogue scale (VAS)] were assessed.
RESULTS: 57 index segments of 53 patients treated with cTDR were analyzed. Pre- and post-operative ROM showed no significant changes (8.0° vs. 10.9°; p > 0.05). Significant correlations between iCOR and IP (Pearson's R: 0.6; p < 0.01) as well as between ROM and IP ap (Pearson's R: - 0.3; p = 0.04) were identified. NDI and VAS improved significantly (p < 0.01). A significant correlation between NDI and IP ap after 12 months (Pearson's R: - 0.39; p < 0.01) was found.
CONCLUSION: Implantation of the tested prosthesis maintains the ROM and results in a physiological iCOR. The exact position of the device correlates with the clinical outcome and emphasize the importance of implant design and precise implant positioning.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; ROM; Unconstrained disc prosthesis; cTDR; iCOR

Year:  2022        PMID: 36219329     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07416-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  18 in total

1.  Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.

Authors:  Bruno C R Lazaro; Kemal Yucesoy; Kasim Z Yuksel; Izabela Kowalczyk; Doron Rabin; Marie Fink; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.

Authors:  Poong-Gi Ahn; Keung Nyun Kim; Sung Whan Moon; Keun Su Kim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-12

3.  Location change of center of rotation after single-level cervical total disc replacement with ProDisc-C.

Authors:  Jigang Lou; Huibo Li; Xin Rong; Wenjie Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  Hans-Jörg Meisel; Lubomír Jurák; Jussi Antinheimo; Ricardo Arregui; Bernhard Bruchmann; Mario Čabraja; Fabrizio Caroli; Stefan Kroppenstedt; Jan Kryl; Juha Pohjola; Ian Shackleford; Steffen Sola; Peter Stosberg; Jan Stulik; Christian Woiciechowsky; Petr Suchomel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-06-03

Review 5.  Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls.

Authors:  Dante Leven; Joshua Meaike; Kris Radcliff; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

6.  A new cervical artificial disc prosthesis based on physiological curvature of end plate: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Cheng Yu; Peng Liu; Da-Geng Huang; Yong-Hong Jiang; Hang Feng; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].

Authors:  J Stulík; J Kryl; P Sebesta; T Vyskocil; M Krbec; T Trc
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.531

8.  Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  J Beaurain; P Bernard; T Dufour; J M Fuentes; I Hovorka; J Huppert; J P Steib; J M Vital; L Aubourg; T Vila
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Won Hyung A Ryu; Izabela Kowalczyk; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 10.  A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF).

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.