Literature DB >> 23578991

Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.

Won Hyung A Ryu1, Izabela Kowalczyk, Neil Duggal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical arthroplasty theoretically reduces the risk of adjacent level disc degeneration and segmental instability that may be seen after a cervical fusion. An essential argument in confirming the utility of cervical arthroplasty is long-term confirmation that cervical disc replacements can maintain physiological kinematics at the index and adjacent levels.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vivo prospective study was to characterize the long-term segmental kinematic outcomes after cervical arthroplasty. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twenty patients with a 5-year clinical follow-up who underwent anterior cervical discectomy with insertion of the Bryan cervical disc. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physiological measures (kinematic analysis of lateral neutral, flexion, and extension radiographic imaging).
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with degenerative disc disease were followed with regular radiographic imaging after implantation of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Lateral neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs (n=240) were analyzed using Quantitative Motion Analysis software (Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, TX, USA) to measure the biomechanical profile at the index level and adjacent levels up to 5 years after surgery. Parameters collected included range of motion (ROM), functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, anterior and posterior disc heights, sagittal translation, and center of rotation (COR).
RESULTS: Biomechanics of the implanted artificial cervical disc was maintained up to 5 years with no significant changes in ROM, FSU angle, disc height, sagittal translation, and COR values when compared with early postoperative performance. Artificial discs were able to adequately restore and maintain preoperative kinematics. Early differences seen in disc height and FSU angle did not change during the duration of follow-up. No significant kyphotic changes or decrease in ROM were seen at the adjacent spinal levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis provides for a durable solution for functional spinal motion at the operated level and maintained the preoperative kinematics at adjacent levels at the 5-year follow-up. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23578991     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  11 in total

1.  Dynamic cervical stabilization: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Guy Matgé; Peter Buddenberg; Marcus Eif; Holger Schenke; Joerg Herdmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Bone loss of the superior adjacent vertebral body immediately posterior to the anterior flange of Bryan cervical disc.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Kim; Young Sun Chung; Alexander E Ropper; Kyung Hoon Min; Tae Keun Ahn; Keun Soo Won; Dong Ah Shin; In Bo Han
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Cervical disc replacement surgery: biomechanical properties, postoperative motion, and postoperative activity levels.

Authors:  Alfred Pisano; Melvin Helgeson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  Clinical and radiological outcome 1-year after cervical total disc replacement using the Signus ROTAIO - Prosthesis.

Authors:  Anna Lang; Sara Lener; Lukas Grassner; Anto Abramovic; Claudius Thomé; Dennis Päsler; Jens Lehmberg; Ralph Schär; Sebastian Hartmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 5.  Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I-II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes.

Authors:  María Aragonés; Eduardo Hevia; Carlos Barrios
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Study on biomechanical analysis of two-level cervical Mobi-C and arthrodesis.

Authors:  Chao Sun; Yang Li; Rongjie Feng; Shijie Han
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Relief of Cervicogenic Headaches after Single-Level and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Diskectomy: A 5-Year Post Hoc Analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan J Liu; Gilbert Cadena; Ripul R Panchal; Rudolph J Schrot; Kee D Kim
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-12-15

8.  Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Hua Chen; Beiyu Wang; Ying Hong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Biomechanics of Hybrid Anterior Cervical Fusion and Artificial Disc Replacement in 3-Level Constructs: An In Vitro Investigation.

Authors:  Zhenhua Liao; Guy R Fogel; Ting Pu; Hongsheng Gu; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-11-03

10.  Primary cervical disc arthroplasty versus cervical disc arthroplasty adjacent to previous fusion: A retrospective study with 48 months of follow-up.

Authors:  Ting-Kui Wu; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Ying Hong; Bei-Yu Wang; Xin Rong; Chen Ding; Hua Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.