Literature DB >> 27258476

Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.

Hans-Jörg Meisel1, Lubomír Jurák2, Jussi Antinheimo3, Ricardo Arregui4, Bernhard Bruchmann5, Mario Čabraja6, Fabrizio Caroli7, Stefan Kroppenstedt8, Jan Kryl9, Juha Pohjola3, Ian Shackleford10, Steffen Sola11, Peter Stosberg1, Jan Stulik9, Christian Woiciechowsky12, Petr Suchomel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Recent studies have described encouraging outcomes after cervical total disc replacement (cTDR), but there are also critical debates regarding the long-term effects of heterotopic ossification (HO) and the prevalence of adjacent-level degeneration. The aim in this paper was to provide 4-year clinical and radiographic outcome results on the activ C disc prosthesis. METHODS A total of 200 subjects underwent single-level activ C (Aesculap AG) implantation between C-3 and C-7 for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge, and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years. Radiographic evaluations were done by an independent core laboratory using a specific software for quantitative motion analysis. RESULTS Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck and arm pain decreased significantly from baseline to the 4-year follow-up. The mean improvement for NDI was 20, for VAS severity and frequency of neck pain 26.4 and 28, and for VAS severity and frequency of arm pain 30.7 and 35.1, respectively. The neurological situation improved for the majority of patients (86.4%); 76.1% of cases were asymptomatic. Subsequent surgical interventions were reported in 7% of the cases, including device removals in 3%. In 2.5% a subsidence greater than 3 mm was recorded; 1 of these cases also had a migration greater than 3 mm. No device displacement, expulsion, disassembly, loose or fractured device, osteolysis, or facet joint degeneration at the index level was observed. Segmental lordotic alignment changed from -2.4° preoperatively to -6.2° at 4 years, and postoperative height was maintained during the follow-up. Advanced HO (Grade III and IV) was present in 27.1% of the cases; 82.4% showed segmental mobility. A progression of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration occurred in 28.2%, but only 4.5% required surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS The activ C is a safe and effective device for cervical disc replacement confirming the encouraging results after cTDR. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02492724 ( clinicaltrials.gov ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; AE = adverse event; AP = anteroposterior; ASD = adjacent-segment disease; BMI = body mass index; COI = conflict of interest; COR = center of rotation; FJD = facet joint degeneration; HO = heterotopic ossification; NDI = Neck Disability Index; Neck Disability Index; RCT = randomized controlled trial; ROM = range of motion; VAS = visual analog scale; activ C; adjacent-segment degeneration; cTDR = cervical total disc replacement; cervical spine; clinical outcome; degenerative disc disease; heterotopic ossification; long-term results; range of motion; total disc replacement; visual analog scale

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27258476     DOI: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE15810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  11 in total

1.  Challenging the state of the art.

Authors:  Hans Jörg Meisel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

2.  Clinical and radiological outcome 1-year after cervical total disc replacement using the Signus ROTAIO - Prosthesis.

Authors:  Anna Lang; Sara Lener; Lukas Grassner; Anto Abramovic; Claudius Thomé; Dennis Päsler; Jens Lehmberg; Ralph Schär; Sebastian Hartmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Clinical experience and two-year follow-up with a one-piece viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement.

Authors:  Kingsley Richard Chin; Jacob Ryan Lubinski; Kari Bracher Zimmers; Barry Eugene Sands; Fabio Pencle
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

4.  Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Total Disc Replacement at 7 Years-Prevalence, Progression, Clinical Implications, and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; David A Cavanaugh; Eubulus J Kerr; Phillip Andrew Utter; Peter G Campbell; Kelly A Frank; Kyle E Marshall; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

5.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery versus total disc replacement: A comparative study with minimum of 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Si-Dong Yang; Yan-Bo Zhu; Suo-Zhou Yan; Jun Di; Da-Long Yang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Suo-Zhou Yan; Jun Di; Yong Shen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-06-02

7.  Effect of preoperative segmental range of motion on patient outcomes in cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ting-Kui Wu; Hao Liu; Chen Ding; Xin Rong; Jun-Bo He; Kang-Kang Huang; Ying Hong; Bei-Yu Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Correlation of neural foraminal motion after surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy with long-term patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Timothy Baumer; Daniel Oravec; Azam Basheer; Michael J Bey; Stephen W Bartol; Victor Chang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

9.  The Changes in Cervical Biomechanics After CTDR and Its Association With Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Hui; Kevin Phan; Mei-Yi Lee; Jack Kerferd; Telvinderjit Singh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-03

10.  Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lin-Nan Wang; Bo-Wen Hu; Lei Wang; Yue-Ming Song; Xi Yang; Li-Min Liu; Hao Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.