Literature DB >> 36212616

Comparative evaluation of extrasinus versus intrasinus approach for zygomatic implant placement.

Deepika Kumari Jain1, U S Pal1, Shadab Mohammad1, Divya Mehrotra1, Ravi Katrolia1, Saatvik Shandilya1, Lakshya Yadav1, Arunesh Kumar Tiwari1.   

Abstract

Edentulism, a common problem can occur either as a congenital defect or acquired later due to dental caries, periodontitis, as a consequence of aging, maxillofacial trauma or post-ablation in tumor resections. The rehabilitation of the missing teeth can be done using dental implants. To overcome the deficiency of available bone, processes like sinus augmentation with substituted bone graft and Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone graft have been described in the literature. In order to overcome the associated limitations with these procedures, implants were designed that can be placed in specific anatomical areas like zygoma. This study aims to compare two different types of surgical approaches (Intrasinus vs Extrasinus) for the placement of zygomatic implants to treat atrophic maxilla. The placement of zygomatic implant through both extrasinus and intrasinus approaches were evaluated on the basis of different parameters and it was observed that postoperative pain and swelling was significantly found in intra sinus approach as compared to extra sinus approach. However, in the intranasal approach, poor patient compliance or low satisfaction rate was observed as compared to extra sinus approach. On the basis of the results of the study and post operative evaluation based on various criteria, it was concluded that extra sinus approach has got an edge over intra sinus approach.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Craniofacial Research Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrophic maxilla; Extrasinus; Implants; Intrasinus; Zygomatic implants

Year:  2022        PMID: 36212616      PMCID: PMC9535122          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of bone density in the posterior maxilla based on Hounsfield units to enhance the initial stability of implants.

Authors:  Motofumi Sogo; Kazunori Ikebe; Tsung-Chieh Yang; Masahiro Wada; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.932

2.  Length of the drilling holes of zygomatic implants inserted with the standard technique or a revised method: a comparative study in dry skulls.

Authors:  Paula Chiattone Corvello; Aline Montagner; Felipe Correa Batista; Ricardo Smidt; Rosemary Sadami Shinkai
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Finite element analysis of different surgical approaches in various occlusal loading locations for zygomatic implant placement for the treatment of atrophic maxillae.

Authors:  M I Ishak; M R Abdul Kadir; E Sulaiman; N H Abu Kasim
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Bilateral Cutaneous Fistula After the Placement of Zygomatic Implants.

Authors:  Blas Garcia Garcia; Juan Jose Ruiz Masera; Francisco Manuel Zafra Camacho
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code.

Authors:  Carlos Aparicio; Roberto López-Piriz; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-05

7.  Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rubén Davó; Pietro Felice; Roberto Pistilli; Carlo Barausse; Carlos Marti-Pages; Ada Ferrer-Fuertes; Daniela Rita Ippolito; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.123

8.  Zygomatic implants for the management of the severely atrophied maxilla: a retrospective analysis of 244 implants.

Authors:  Humberto Fernández; Andrés Gómez-Delgado; Sergio Trujillo-Saldarriaga; Daniel Varón-Cardona; Jaime Castro-Núñez
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants-Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Ruben Davó; Simonas Bankauskas; Remigijus Laurincikas; Ismail Doruk Koçyigit; José Eduardo Mate Sanchez de Val
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  An Anatomical Study of Maxillary-Zygomatic Complex Using Three-Dimensional Computerized Tomography-Based Zygomatic Implantation.

Authors:  Xiangliang Xu; Shijie Zhao; Hui Liu; Zhipeng Sun; Jianwei Wang; Weiguang Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.