Literature DB >> 32050501

Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants-Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Ruben Davó1, Simonas Bankauskas2, Remigijus Laurincikas2, Ismail Doruk Koçyigit3, José Eduardo Mate Sanchez de Val1.   

Abstract

The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 consecutive patients who had received 182 zygomatic implants. Patients were fully edentulous (62.2%), partially edentulous (22.0%), or had failing dentition (15.9%). Most patients (87.5%) did not have previous sinusitis and 11.3% had been previously treated for it. Additionally, about half of the patients (53.8%) did not present periodontal pathology, and one-third (36.3%) did, but were subsequently treated. Most implants (93.8%) were loaded immediately, i.e., within 48 h of placement. Implants were followed for 10.5 ± 7.2 months, and all were recorded as surviving and stable at last follow-up. Post-operative complications were infrequent and included sinusitis (10.1%) and peri-implant hyperplasia (0.8%). The low complication rate and 100% implant survival and stability indicate that zygomatic implants offer a viable treatment option when performing graftless restoration of severely resorbed maxilla, including immediate loading protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  edentulous; resorbed maxilla; zygomatic implant

Year:  2020        PMID: 32050501     DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  4 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of extrasinus versus intrasinus approach for zygomatic implant placement.

Authors:  Deepika Kumari Jain; U S Pal; Shadab Mohammad; Divya Mehrotra; Ravi Katrolia; Saatvik Shandilya; Lakshya Yadav; Arunesh Kumar Tiwari
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-09-10

2.  Science, Innovation and Education as Pillars of High-Quality Implant Dentistry: Overcoming Challenges through Innovation Dictates Trends.

Authors:  Miguel de Araújo Nobre
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 1-year follow-up non-interventional study.

Authors:  Carlos Aparicio; Waldemar D Polido; James Chow; Rubén Davó; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 4.  Survival Rate and Prosthetic and Sinus Complications of Zygomatic Dental Implants for the Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Gutiérrez Muñoz; Caterina Obrador Aldover; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Héctor González Menéndez; Juan Lorrio Castro; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; José María Montiel-Company; Sofía Hernández Montero
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.