Literature DB >> 22575179

Finite element analysis of different surgical approaches in various occlusal loading locations for zygomatic implant placement for the treatment of atrophic maxillae.

M I Ishak1, M R Abdul Kadir, E Sulaiman, N H Abu Kasim.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two different types of surgical approaches, intrasinus and extramaxillary, for the placement of zygomatic implants to treat atrophic maxillae. A computational finite element simulation was used to analyze the strength of implant anchorage for both approaches in various occlusal loading locations. Three-dimensional models of the craniofacial structures surrounding a region of interest, soft tissue and framework were developed using computed tomography image datasets. The implants were modelled using computer-aided design software. The bone was assumed to be linear isotropic with a stiffness of 13.4 GPa, and the implants were assumed to be made of titanium with a stiffness of 110 GPa. Masseter forces of 300 N were applied at the zygomatic arch, and occlusal loads of 150 N were applied vertically onto the framework surface at different locations. The intrasinus approach demonstrated more satisfactory results and could be a viable treatment option. The extramaxillary approach could also be recommended as a reasonable treatment option, provided some improvements are made to address the cantilever effects seen with that approach.
Copyright © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22575179     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  5 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of extrasinus versus intrasinus approach for zygomatic implant placement.

Authors:  Deepika Kumari Jain; U S Pal; Shadab Mohammad; Divya Mehrotra; Ravi Katrolia; Saatvik Shandilya; Lakshya Yadav; Arunesh Kumar Tiwari
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-09-10

2.  Extramaxillary Zygomatic Implants: An Alternative Approach for the Reconstruction of the Atrophic Maxilla.

Authors:  Ori Blanc; Dekel Shilo; Efi Weitman; Tal Capucha; Adi Rachmiel
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

3.  Simplifying the Treatment of Bone Atrophy in the Posterior Regions: Combination of Zygomatic and Wide-Short Implants-A Case Report with 2 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Fernanda Faot; Geninho Thomé; Amália Machado Bielemann; Caio Hermann; Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo; Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan; Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-10-27

4.  Stresses generated by two zygomatic implant placement techniques associated with conventional inclined anterior implants.

Authors:  Paulo H T Almeida; Sergio H Cacciacane; Fabiana M G França
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-21

5.  Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Julio Tobar-Reyes; Luis Andueza-Castro; Antonio Jiménez-Silva; Roger Bustamante-Plaza; Juan Carvajal-Herrera
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-05-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.