Literature DB >> 36208315

Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.

Antoine Jeanne-Julien1, Olivier Bouchot2, Stéphane De Vergie2, Julien Branchereau2, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe2, Jérôme Rigaud2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the morbidity of inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in penile cancer, then to compare this morbidity with that of ILND performed in the context of skin cancer treatment.
METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients having undergone ILND between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2019 in our centre's urology department in the context of treatment of penile cancer or skin cancer. Postoperative complications were reported in accordance with the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two ILNDs were performed in 122 patients with penile cancer and 56 ILNDs were performed in 56 patients with skin cancer. The most common early complication was postoperative fluid collection (lymphocele or haematoma), which complicated 44% of ILNDs overall and 60% of radical lymphadenectomies. The most common late complication was leg lymphoedema, found in up to 36% of radical lymphadenectomies. Major complications (grade ≥ III) were very rare (4% of radical lymphadenectomies). Radical lymphadenectomies resulted in significantly more cases of postoperative fluid collection, skin necrosis and dehiscence, as well as leg lymphoedema, than modified lymphadenectomy techniques. Two factors significantly increasing postoperative morbidity were demonstrated: ASA score = 3 (OR = 3.09) and operating time (OR = 1.01).
CONCLUSION: ILNDs are morbid surgical procedures for which the indications must be well defined. However, the complications are almost exclusively minor, for a major oncological benefit.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inguinal lymph node dissection; Inguinal lymphadenectomy; Morbidity; Penile cancer; Risk factor

Year:  2022        PMID: 36208315     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04169-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   3.661


  28 in total

1.  Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Olivier Bouchot; Jérome Rigaud; Frédéric Maillet; Jean François Hetet; Georges Karam
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Morbidity of dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma.

Authors:  B K Kroon; A P Lont; R A Valdés Olmos; O E Nieweg; S Horenblas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16INK4a in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tina Bech Olesen; Freja Lærke Sand; Christina Louise Rasmussen; Vanna Albieri; Birgitte Grønkær Toft; Bodil Norrild; Christian Munk; Susanne Krüger Kjær
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinically node-negative penile cancer versus radical inguinal lymphadenectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sisto Perdonà; Riccardo Autorino; Marco De Sio; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Luigi Gallo; Rocco Damiano; Massimo D'Armiento; Antonio Gallo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Prognostic factors in patients with penile cancer after surgical management.

Authors:  Shuguang Wen; Wenbiao Ren; Bichen Xue; Yi Fan; Yongjun Jiang; Chunming Zeng; Yujia Li; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Penile Cancer: Contemporary Lymph Node Management.

Authors:  Jonathan S O'Brien; Marlon Perera; Todd Manning; Mike Bozin; Sonja Cabarkapa; Emily Chen; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.

Authors:  Martijn M Stuiver; Rosa S Djajadiningrat; Niels M Graafland; Andrew D Vincent; Cees Lucas; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Andres F Correa; Elizabeth Handorf; Shreyas S Joshi; Daniel M Geynisman; Alexander Kutikov; David Y Chen; Robert G Uzzo; Rosalia Viterbo; Richard E Greenberg; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours.

Authors:  Ninna Kjaer Nielsen; Jakob Kristian Jakobsen; Pernille Skjold Kingo; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.