Literature DB >> 23490726

Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.

Martijn M Stuiver1, Rosa S Djajadiningrat, Niels M Graafland, Andrew D Vincent, Cees Lucas, Simon Horenblas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complication rates after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) are high. Risk factors for early wound complications after ILND in patients with penile carcinoma have not yet been studied.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of early wound complications in a contemporary series and to identify clinical risk factors for early wound complications after ILND for penile carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated 237 ILNDs in 163 patients with penile cancer treated between 2003 and 2012 at the Netherlands Cancer Institute. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We assessed the occurrence of wound infection, skin-flap problems, and seroma formation and graded complications using the modified Clavien system. Univariable and multivariable penalised mixed effects logistic regression was used to identify clinical risk factors for occurrence of any complication (grade ≥ 1) and of moderate to severe complications (grade ≥ 2). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: One complication or more occurred in 58% of the procedures, and 10% of those complications were severe. Wound infection occurred in 43%, seroma formation occurred in 24%, and skin-flap problems occurred in 16%. Palpable disease was the only factor associated with grade ≥ 1 complications in the univariable analysis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; p=0.02). In the multivariable model, after penalisation, no statistically significant risk factors remained. Univariable associations for grade ≥ 2 complications were present for body mass index (BMI; OR of 1.66 for a 5.8-point change in BMI; p=0.05) and sartorius muscle transposition (OR: 2.64; p=0.04). In the reduced multivariable model, the OR for sartorius muscle transposition was 2.12 (p=0.06) and for BMI was 1.76 (p=0.03). In addition, bilateral dissection approached significance in the multivariable model (OR: 2.17; p=0.06). This study is limited by its observational nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Wound complication rates after ILND are high in this cohort. BMI, sartorius muscle transposition, and bilateral dissection were the factors most strongly associated with the occurrence of grade ≥ 2 wound complications.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymphadenectomy; Morbidity; Penile neoplasms; Risk factors; Squamous cell carcinoma; Wound complications

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23490726     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  23 in total

1.  [Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: Study for prevention of wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer by epidermal vacuum therapy (PräVAC, EUDAMED: CIV-12-07-008204; DRKS-ID: DRKS00005257)].

Authors:  T Maurer; A K Seitz; S Schneider; C Protzel; M Retz; H Rexer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gkegkes; Evelyn Eleni Minis; Christos Iavazzo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-05

3.  [Inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: study on the prevention of wound healing complications].

Authors:  T Maurer; C Protzel; J E Gschwend; H Rexer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Early experience of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: review of surgical outcomes relative to alternative approaches.

Authors:  Talar B Kharadjian; Surena F Matin; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Sarcopenia as a predictor of complications in penile cancer patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Jamie T Caracciolo; George J Richard; Michael A Poch; Julio Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.

Authors:  Antoine Jeanne-Julien; Olivier Bouchot; Stéphane De Vergie; Julien Branchereau; Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe; Jérôme Rigaud
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  [Long-term results of sentinel node biopsy diagnostics in penile carcinoma : Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in cases with nonpalpable lymph nodes in the groin].

Authors:  C M Naumann; K Bothe; A-K Munk-Hartig; C van der Horst; H Massad; U Lützen; K-P Jünemann; M F Hamann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Value and efficiency of sentinel lymph node diagnostics in patients with penile carcinoma with palpable inguinal lymph nodes as a new multimodal, minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Ulf Lützen; Maaz Zuhayra; Marlies Marx; Yi Zhao; Christian Colberg; Stephanie Knüpfer; René Baumann; Katharina Charlotte Kähler; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Carsten Maik Naumann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Robot assisted lymphadenectomy in urology: pelvic, retroperitoneal and inguinal.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Surena F Matin; Nazareno Suardi; Mihir Desai; Inderbir Gill; James Porter; Robert J Stein; Rene Sotelo; Franco Gaboardi; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2016-11-08

10.  Practice Patterns Among Penile Cancer Surgeons Performing Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Radical Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Men with Penile Cancer: A eUROGEN Survey.

Authors:  Christian D Fankhauser; Benjamin E Ayres; Allaudin Issa; Maarten Albersen; Nick Watkin; Asif Muneer; Vijay Sangar; Arie Parnham
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.