Literature DB >> 36204543

Longitudinal Assessment of Posttreatment Diffuse Glioma Tissue Volumes with Three-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks.

Jeffrey D Rudie1, Evan Calabrese1, Rachit Saluja1, David Weiss1, John B Colby1, Soonmee Cha1, Christopher P Hess1, Andreas M Rauschecker1, Leo P Sugrue1, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer1.   

Abstract

Neural networks were trained for segmentation and longitudinal assessment of posttreatment diffuse glioma. A retrospective cohort (from January 2018 to December 2019) of 298 patients with diffuse glioma (mean age, 52 years ± 14 [SD]; 177 men; 152 patients with glioblastoma, 72 patients with astrocytoma, and 74 patients with oligodendroglioma) who underwent two consecutive multimodal MRI examinations were randomly selected into training (n = 198) and testing (n = 100) samples. A posttreatment tumor segmentation three-dimensional nnU-Net convolutional neural network with multichannel inputs (T1, T2, and T1 postcontrast and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) was trained to segment three multiclass tissue types (peritumoral edematous, infiltrated, or treatment-changed tissue [ED]; active tumor or enhancing tissue [AT]; and necrotic core). Separate longitudinal change nnU-Nets were trained on registered and subtracted FLAIR and T1 postlongitudinal images to localize and better quantify and classify changes in ED and AT. Segmentation Dice scores, volume similarities, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distances ranged from 0.72 to 0.89, 0.90 to 0.96, and 2.5 to 3.6 mm, respectively. Accuracy rates of the posttreatment tumor segmentation and longitudinal change networks being able to classify longitudinal changes in ED and AT as increased, decreased, or unchanged were 76%-79% and 90%-91%, respectively. The accuracy levels of the longitudinal change networks were not significantly different from those of three neuroradiologists (accuracy, 90%-92%; κ, 0.58-0.63; P > .05). The results of this study support the potential clinical value of artificial intelligence-based automated longitudinal assessment of posttreatment diffuse glioma. Keywords: MR Imaging, Neuro-Oncology, Neural Networks, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Segmentation, Quantification, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.
© 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain/Brain Stem; CNS; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); MR Imaging; Neural Networks; Neuro-Oncology; Quantification; Segmentation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36204543      PMCID: PMC9530762          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  11 in total

1.  Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging.

Authors:  M T Duong; J D Rudie; J Wang; L Xie; S Mohan; J C Gee; A M Rauschecker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Susan M Chang; Martin J Van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; David R Macdonald; Eudocia Q Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark R Gilbert; Meihua Wang; Kenneth D Aldape; Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Kurt A Jaeckle; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Minhee Won; Deborah T Blumenthal; Anita Mahajan; Christopher J Schultz; Sara Erridge; Brigitta Baumert; Kristen I Hopkins; Tzahala Tzuk-Shina; Paul D Brown; Arnab Chakravarti; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Rudie; Andreas M Rauschecker; R Nick Bryan; Christos Davatzikos; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation.

Authors:  Fabian Isensee; Paul F Jaeger; Simon A A Kohl; Jens Petersen; Klaus H Maier-Hein
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Automatic assessment of glioma burden: a deep learning algorithm for fully automated volumetric and bidimensional measurement.

Authors:  Ken Chang; Andrew L Beers; Harrison X Bai; James M Brown; K Ina Ly; Xuejun Li; Joeky T Senders; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Alessandro Boaro; Chang Su; Wenya Linda Bi; Otto Rapalino; Weihua Liao; Qin Shen; Hao Zhou; Bo Xiao; Yinyan Wang; Paul J Zhang; Marco C Pinho; Patrick Y Wen; Tracy T Batchelor; Jerrold L Boxerman; Omar Arnaout; Bruce R Rosen; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Li Yang; Raymond Y Huang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Multi-Disease Segmentation of Gliomas and White Matter Hyperintensities in the BraTS Data Using a 3D Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Rudie; David A Weiss; Rachit Saluja; Andreas M Rauschecker; Jiancong Wang; Leo Sugrue; Spyridon Bakas; John B Colby
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.