Mark R Gilbert1, Meihua Wang, Kenneth D Aldape, Roger Stupp, Monika E Hegi, Kurt A Jaeckle, Terri S Armstrong, Jeffrey S Wefel, Minhee Won, Deborah T Blumenthal, Anita Mahajan, Christopher J Schultz, Sara Erridge, Brigitta Baumert, Kristen I Hopkins, Tzahala Tzuk-Shina, Paul D Brown, Arnab Chakravarti, Walter J Curran, Minesh P Mehta. 1. Mark R. Gilbert, Kenneth D. Aldape, Terri S. Armstrong, Jeffrey S. Wefel, Anita Mahajan, and Paul D. Brown, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Terri S. Armstrong, University of Texas Health Science Center-School of Nursing, Houston, TX; Meihua Wang and Minhee Won, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Statistical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Roger Stupp and Monika E. Hegi, Lausanne University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland; Kurt A. Jaeckle, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Deborah T. Blumenthal, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv; Tzahala Tzuk-Shina, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Christopher J. Schultz, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Sara Erridge, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland; Brigitta G. Baumert, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Kristen I. Hopkins, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Arnab Chakravarti, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital/Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Walter J. Curran Jr, Emory University Winship Cancer Center, Atlanta, GA; and Minesh P. Mehta, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumor MGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status. RESULTS:A total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P = .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P < .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P < .001), and response (P = .012). There was increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P < .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumorMGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status. RESULTS: A total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P = .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P < .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P < .001), and response (P = .012). There was increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P < .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.
Authors: Marc L Citron; Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; William J Gradishar; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Robert Livingston; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; John Carpenter; David Hurd; James F Holland; Barbara L Smith; Carolyn I Sartor; Eleanor H Leung; Jeffrey Abrams; Richard L Schilsky; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Brada; Sally Stenning; Rhian Gabe; Lindsay C Thompson; David Levy; Roy Rampling; Sara Erridge; Frank Saran; Rao Gattamaneni; Kirsten Hopkins; Sarah Beall; V Peter Collins; Siow-Ming Lee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Esteller; J Garcia-Foncillas; E Andion; S N Goodman; O F Hidalgo; V Vanaclocha; S B Baylin; J G Herman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-05-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A W Tolcher; S L Gerson; L Denis; C Geyer; L A Hammond; A Patnaik; A D Goetz; G Schwartz; T Edwards; L Reyderman; P Statkevich; D L Cutler; E K Rowinsky Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Els Genbrugge; Thierry Gorlia; Roger Stupp; Mark R Gilbert; Olivier L Chinot; L Burt Nabors; Greg Jones; Wim Van Criekinge; Josef Straub; Michael Weller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; David A Reardon; John F de Groot; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jinkyu Jung; Leo Jy Kim; Xiuxing Wang; Qiulian Wu; Tanwarat Sanvoranart; Christopher G Hubert; Briana C Prager; Lisa C Wallace; Xun Jin; Stephen C Mack; Jeremy N Rich Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-05-18
Authors: Antje Wick; Tobias Kessler; Michael Platten; Christoph Meisner; Michael Bamberg; Ulrich Herrlinger; Jörg Felsberg; Astrid Weyerbrock; Kirsten Papsdorf; Joachim P Steinbach; Michael Sabel; Jan Vesper; Jürgen Debus; Jürgen Meixensberger; Ralf Ketter; Caroline Hertler; Regine Mayer-Steinacker; Sarah Weisang; Hanna Bölting; David Reuss; Guido Reifenberger; Felix Sahm; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 12.300