Literature DB >> 20456662

ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.

Raoul Bell1, Sandra Dentale, Axel Buchner, Susanne Mayr.   

Abstract

The irrelevant sound effect refers to a decrement in serial-recall performance when auditory distractors are played during encoding or retention of the to-be-remembered items. We examined the event-related brain potentials (ERPs) that were elicited in response to the auditory distractors during encoding and retention of visually presented target sequences. Changing-state distractor sequences that consisted of several different distractor items interfered more with serial recall than steady-state sequences that consisted of repetitions of a single distractor item. The ERP responses that were elicited in response to the distractors comprised the exogenous N1 component and were further characterized by a subsequent positive wave, and a late negativity. The changing-state effect was associated with an increased N1 and a P3a. The results support the attention-capture account of the irrelevant sound effect.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456662     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01029.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  11 in total

1.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

2.  Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Authors:  Larissa Leist; Thomas Lachmann; Sabine J Schlittmeier; Markus Georgi; Maria Klatte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-03

3.  The suppression of spontaneous face touch and resulting consequences on memory performance of high and low self-touching individuals.

Authors:  Jente L Spille; Martin Grunwald; Sven Martin; Stephanie M Mueller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh; Anatole Nöstl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

5.  What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The impact of simulated MRI scanner background noise on visual attention processes as measured by the EEG.

Authors:  S Oliver Kobald; Stephan Getzmann; Christian Beste; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cognitive and emotional regulation processes of spontaneous facial self-touch are activated in the first milliseconds of touch: Replication of previous EEG findings and further insights.

Authors:  Jente L Spille; Stephanie M Mueller; Sven Martin; Martin Grunwald
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.526

10.  Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Sarah Hanl; Linda Paul; Wolfgang Ellermeier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.