Literature DB >> 30816785

Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.

Raoul Bell1, Jan P Röer2, Albert-Georg Lang1, Axel Buchner1.   

Abstract

Sound disrupts short-term retention in working memory even when the sound is completely irrelevant and has to be ignored. The dominant view in the literature is that this type of disruption is essentially limited to so-called changing-state distractor sequences with acoustic changes between successive distractor objects (e.g., "ABABABAB") and does not occur with so-called steady-state distractor sequences that are composed of a single repeated distractor object (e.g., "AAAAAAAA"). Here we show that this view can no longer be maintained. What is more, disruption by steady-state distractors is significantly reduced after preexposure to the distractor item, directly confirming a central assumption of attentional explanations of auditory distraction and parallel to what has been shown earlier for changing-state sounds. Taken together, the findings reported here are compatible with a graded attentional account of auditory disruption, and they are incompatible with the duplex-mechanism account. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30816785     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Decomposing the role of rehearsal in auditory distraction during serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2020-11-10

2.  Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Authors:  Larissa Leist; Thomas Lachmann; Sabine J Schlittmeier; Markus Georgi; Maria Klatte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-03

3.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell; François Vachon; Paul J Taylor; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Doubts About the Role of Rehearsal in the Irrelevant Sound Effect.

Authors:  Jamielyn R Samper; Alexandra Morrison; Jason Chein
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2021-12-15

7.  Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Sarah Hanl; Linda Paul; Wolfgang Ellermeier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-14

8.  Dissociating the Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Music and Speech on Serial Recall of Tonal and Verbal Sequences.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Hanna Meinhardt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-05

9.  Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Axel Buchner; Jan Philipp Röer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-12-19

10.  The metacognition of auditory distraction: Judgments about the effects of deviating and changing auditory distractors on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.