Samir Mohamed El Rayes1, Gaber El-Enany2,3, Mohamed Sayed Gomaa4, Ibrahim A I Ali1, Walid Fathalla3, Faheem Hyder Pottoo5, Firdos Alam Khan6. 1. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt. 2. Department of Physics, College of Science and Arts in Uglat Asugour, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Kingdom of Suadi Arabia. 3. Science & Math Department, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Said 42526, Egypt. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 5. Department of Pharmacology, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 6. Department of Stem Cell Research, Institute of Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
A series of 27 new quinoxaline derivatives (N-alkyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)]acetamides, methyl-2-[2-(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)-acetylamino]alkanoates, and their corresponding dipeptides) were prepared from 3-phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione based on the chemoselective reaction with soft electrophiles. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to study the efficacy of 27 compounds on cancer cell viability and proliferation. A total of 13 compounds (4a-c, 5, 6, 8c, 9c, 9f, 10a, 10b, 11c, 12b, and 12c) showed inhibitory action on HCT-116 cancer cells and 15 compounds (4a-c, 5, 6, 8c, 9a, 9c, 9f, 9h, 10b, 11c, 12a, 12b, and 12c) showed activity on MCF-7 cancer cells, with compound 10b exhibiting the highest inhibitory action (IC50 1.52 and 2 μg/mL, respectively) on both cell lines. The molecular modeling studies on the human thymidylate synthase (hTS) homodimer interface showed that these compounds are good binders and could selectively inhibit the enzyme by stabilizing its inactive conformation. The study also identified key residues for homodimer binding, which could be used for further optimization and development.
A series of 27 new quinoxaline derivatives (N-alkyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)]acetamides, methyl-2-[2-(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)-acetylamino]alkanoates, and their corresponding dipeptides) were prepared from 3-phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione based on the chemoselective reaction with soft electrophiles. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to study the efficacy of 27 compounds on cancer cell viability and proliferation. A total of 13 compounds (4a-c, 5, 6, 8c, 9c, 9f, 10a, 10b, 11c, 12b, and 12c) showed inhibitory action on HCT-116 cancer cells and 15 compounds (4a-c, 5, 6, 8c, 9a, 9c, 9f, 9h, 10b, 11c, 12a, 12b, and 12c) showed activity on MCF-7 cancer cells, with compound 10b exhibiting the highest inhibitory action (IC50 1.52 and 2 μg/mL, respectively) on both cell lines. The molecular modeling studies on the human thymidylate synthase (hTS) homodimer interface showed that these compounds are good binders and could selectively inhibit the enzyme by stabilizing its inactive conformation. The study also identified key residues for homodimer binding, which could be used for further optimization and development.
Quinoxaline possesses
a wide variety of therapeutic properties.
Many quinoxaline derivatives have been found with distinct anticancer,[1] antiviral,[2] anthelmintic,[3] antimicrobial,[4] anti-inflammatory,[5] antioxidant,[6] and
antiprotozoal activities.[7] Quinoxaline
and its derivatives have recently been recognized as effective chemotherapeutic
agents against a number of tumors.[8−10] Earlier discussion on
the feasibility of quinoxaline anticancer activity revealed a number
of pathways including the inhibition of enzymes (tyrosine kinases
and c-MET kinase)[11−14] as well as induction of apoptosis and tumor hypoxia.[15−17] Recently, we have studied the structure–activity relationship
in methyl-2-[3-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)propanamido]alkanoates
and N-alkyl-3-((3-phenylquinoxalin-2-yl)sulfanyl)propanamides
by molecular docking via examining the binding affinity to the human
thymidylate synthase (hTS) allosteric site.[18] This study proved the significance of the peptidomimetic side chain
at position 3 of the quinoxaline ring. These compounds were tested
against human HCT-116 and MCF-7 cell lines and showed remarkable results
with IC50 values in the range of 1.9–7.52 μg/mL
compared to the reference drug doxorubicin (IC50 3.23 μg/mL).
In continuation to this study, we found it interesting to prepare
a series of N-alkyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)]
acetamides, methyl-2-[2-(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)-acetylamino]
alkanoates, and their corresponding dipeptides as new anticancer drugs.
The newly synthesized derivatives were screened for their antitumor
activity against the liver carcinoma cell line (HepG2). The mechanism
of the antiproliferative activity of the synthesized compounds was
studied through their binding to the human thymidylate synthase (hTS)
homodimer interface using molecular docking.
Results
and Discussion
Chemistry
The
feasibility of N-cyclohexyldithiocarbamatecyclohexylammonium
salt 2 as an excellent thiating reagent was earlier discussed
in
a number of articles.[18−20] 3-Phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione
(3) could be obtained simply by the reaction of chloroquinoxaline 1 with 2 in chloroform for 12 h at 61 °C
to afford 3 in excellent yield, Scheme .[18,19]
Scheme 1
Preparation of Phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione (3)
The model compound 3-phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione
(3) as a heterocyclic thioamide is presented in a tautomeric
mixture between thiol and thione forms.[21,22] This ambident
nucleophile behavior of 3 could be invested to modify
the quinoxaline ring structure by simple chemoselective alkylation
reactions at nitrogen and sulfur atoms. However, the unique structure
of 3 bearing a phenyl group contributing to a continuous
conjugation in the whole molecule makes the S-atom
bear both soft and hard characteristics. This was practically proved
in our previous research following the reaction of 3-phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione (3) with hard electrophilic alkylating
reagents (activated acrylic acid compounds) to give S-substituted derivatives.[18] Herein, we
wish to report the reaction of model quinoxaline 3 with
soft electrophiles and to invest the products to prepare a number
of biologically promising compounds. Thus, 3 reacted
with a number of soft electrophiles (chloroacetonitrile, phenacyl
chloride, allyl bromide, and ethyl chloroacetate) in the presence
of triethylamine to give S-alkylated derivatives 4a–c and 5, respectively,
in 73–81 and 73% yields, Scheme .
Scheme 2
Reaction of Phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione (3) with Soft Electrophiles
The structure assignment of the prepared S-substituted
quinoxaline derivatives 4a–c and 5 is based on 1H and 13C NMR spectral
and physicochemical analysis. The 1H NMR spectrum of ethyl(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)acetate
(5) shows an interesting singlet signal at 4.03 ppm corresponding
to the SCH2CO group, which clearly confirms the site of
alkylation. The 1H NMR spectrum of 5 also
shows two signals at 4.25 and 1.29 ppm corresponding to ester OCH2CH3 beside several multiplet signals ranging between
8.08 and 7.51 ppm for nine aromatic protons. The 13C NMR
spectrum of 5 displays an interesting signal at 33.4
ppm for SCH2CO, which once again confirms the site of alkylation.
The 13C NMR spectrum of 5 also shows signals
at δ 169.2, 61.6, and 14.2 ppm corresponding to C=O,
OCH2, and CH3 groups, respectively.The S-substituted ester ethyl(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)acetate
(5) is an excellent precursor for the structural modification
of the quinoxaline ring system at the sulfur atom and the introduction
of either amino acid or alkyl amine residues via the azide coupling
method.[23,24]Ester 5 was refluxed
with hydrazine hydrate in ethyl
alcohol to afford the corresponding hydrazides 6 in 82%
yield, Scheme . Hydrazide 6 was converted to the corresponding carbonyl azide derivative 7 by treatment with a NaNO2 and HCl mixture in
an ice bath for 15 min and was extracted with ethyl acetate. The in
situ-generated ethyl acetate solution of azide 7 was
used without purification and reacted with amino acid methyl ester
hydrochlorides (glycine, β-alanine, and l-aspartic
acid) in the presence of triethylamine to afford a series of S-substituted methyl-2-[2-(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)acetylamino]alkanoates 8a–c in good yields, Scheme . Similarly, the in situ-generated
ethyl acetate solution of azide 7 reacted with alkane
amines at room temperature for 24 h to afford a series of N-alkyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)]acetamides 9a–i, Scheme .
Scheme 3
Preparation of Methyl-2-[2-(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)acetylamino]alkanoates 8a–c and N-Alkyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)]acetamides 9a–i
The structure assignment of the prepared methyl-2-[2-(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)acetylamino]alkanoates 8a–c and N-alkyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)]acetamides 9a–i is based on 1H and 13C NMR spectral and physicochemical analysis. The 1H NMR spectrum of methyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)acetylamino]acetate
(8a) showed signals at δ 7.28, 4.22, 3.96, and
3.72 ppm corresponding to NH, SCH2, NCH2, and
OCH3, respectively. The 13C NMR spectrum of 8a showed signals at δ 172.12, 168.3, 52.4, 41.7, and
34.6 ppm corresponding to two C=O, OCH3, NHCH2, and SCH2, respectively.Next, we attempted
the modification of the quinoxaline residue
chemical structure of our model by the attachment of the dipeptide
residue to enhance the biological activity. Thus, the reactions of
amino acid derivatives 8a and 8b with hydrazine
hydrate in ethanol for 4 h afforded hydrazides 10a and 10b in good yields. Hydrazides 10a and 10b were first reacted with a NaNO2 and HCl mixture
in an ice bath for 15 min and then extracted with ethyl acetate and
reacted simultaneously with amino acid methyl ester hydrochlorides
(glycine, β-alanine, and l-aspartic acid) to afford
dipeptides 11–12(a–c) in good yields, Scheme .
Scheme 4
Preparation of Dipeptides 11–12(a–c)
Antiproliferative Activities
The
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)
assay was carried out to study the impact of 27 compounds on cancer
cell viability and proliferation. The cytotoxic effects of the compounds
were observed after 48 h of treatment. Fourteen compounds (4a–c, 5, 6, 8c, 9c, 9f, 10a–c, 11c, 12b, and 12c) showed inhibitory action on HCT-116 cancer cells, whereas the remaining
13 compounds did not show any inhibitory action on the cancerous cells.
We calculated the IC50 values for these compounds, and
compound 10b (β-ala hydrazide) showed the highest
inhibitory action, whereas compound 9c (allylamine derivative)
showed the lowest inhibitory action on HCT-116 (Table ). We also examined inhibitory action on
MCF-7 cells. We found that 15 compounds (4a–c, 5, 6, 8c, 9a, 9c, 9f, 9h, 10b, 11c, 12a, 12b,
and 12c) showed inhibitory action on MCF-7 cancer cells,
whereas the remaining 11 compounds did not show any inhibitory action
on the cancerous cells. We calculated the IC50 values for
these compounds and compound 10b showed the highest inhibitory
action, whereas compound 6 showed the lowest inhibitory
action on MCF-7 (Table ).
Table 1
Impact of Synthetic Compounds on Cancer
Cells Using the MTT Assaya
NA = not active.
IC50 value [μg/mL] = inhibitory concentration (IC)
is expressed
in μg/mL.
NA = not active.
IC50 value [μg/mL] = inhibitory concentration (IC)
is expressed
in μg/mL.Next, we
wanted to know whether these compounds selectively target
the cancerous cells or not. We tested these compounds on normal cells
(HEK-293) at the same concentrations and duration of treatments. The
cell viability assay using MTT revealed null cytotoxic effects on
the normal cells.We do not know the molecular mechanism of
cancer cell death, so
it would be interesting to study the role of apoptotic pathways in
synthetic compound-mediated cancer cell death. There are reports of
nanoparticle-induced nuclear fragmentation and disintegration in cancer
cells.[25−29] We suggest that these synthetic compounds possess selective targeting
capability to cancerous cells and could be potential candidates for
cancer treatments.
Molecular Modeling
The preliminary
structure–activity relationship of the synthesized peptidomimetics
showed that substitution of the thiol group with a simple methyl-bearing
group capable of HB formation showed good activity (4a–c, and 5). Substitution of the
thiol at position 3 with a peptidomimetic side chain bearing a single
peptide or amide bond gave variable results with some compounds showing
as good activity as simple alkyl substitution (8c, 10b, and 9f), while others were inactive (8a, 8b, and 9d).Further extension
of the molecules through formation of dipeptides that are connected
to the quinazoline scaffold through a glycine structure gave almost
inactive compounds (11a, 11b, and 12a). However, when the dipeptide is connected through a β-alanine
structure, the activity was regained (12b and 12c).Molecular docking was carried out to explain the results
of the
antiproliferative assay further and obtain better insights into the
binding requirements of these quinazoline peptidomimetics at the hTS
interface.Key interactions at protein–protein interfaces
represent
important targets for small molecule inhibition. This kind of inhibition,
unlike targeting the active site, inhibits intracellular hTS and cell
growth without leading to overexpression of the protein, thereby conferring
more selectivity and specificity.[30]Peptide and nonpeptide[31] inhibitors
were demonstrated by X-ray crystallographic studies to bind hTS at
the homodimer interface and showed allosteric inhibition of the enzyme
through stabilizing its inactive form. Our peptidomimetics were shown
to bind the hTS dimer interface and potentially stabilize its di-inactive
form. The designed peptidomimetics use their peptide-like structure
for optimal binding without being peptides in nature, which makes
them more suitable for pharmaceutical manipulations and development.Upon computational docking, the inhibitors were found predominantly
at the dimer interface in poses that align with the cocrystallized
peptide and maintained the key interactions with the target protein
(hTS, 3N5E).
This was mainly through conserving H-bonding with key residues: Gln172,
Arg175, Ile 190, Met191, and Cys192 from chain A and Leu204 and Pro205
from chain B (Figure ).
Figure 1
Most active compounds 10b green, 12b red, 12c brown, 5 blue, and 9f magenta
and the crystallized inhibitor light blue docked at the hTS homodimer
interface and showing key binding residues. The backbone is represented
as cartoons: gray for chain A and cyan for chain B.
Most active compounds 10b green, 12b red, 12c brown, 5 blue, and 9f magenta
and the crystallized inhibitor light blue docked at the hTS homodimer
interface and showing key binding residues. The backbone is represented
as cartoons: gray for chain A and cyan for chain B.The docking results showed that the most active compounds
(5, 10b, 9f, 12b, and 12c) lie at the interface of the homodimer and
established
interactions with both chains of the homodimer and with the mentioned
key residues (Figure ).The most active compounds showed good stability and affinity
to
the active site by holding very close conformations and key interactions
for most of the provided docked conformations with a relatively low
root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value (Figure ).
Figure 2
Docking conformations of most active compounds. 10b green, 12b red, 12c brown, 5 blue, and 9f magenta.
Docking conformations of most active compounds. 10b green, 12b red, 12c brown, 5 blue, and 9f magenta.In these compounds, the binding affinity also correlates well with
the experimental IC50 value (Table ).
Table 2
Binding Affinities
and IC50 for Most Active Compounds
IC50 values (μg/mL)
IC50 values (μg/mL)
binding affinity (kcal/mol)
HCT-116
MCF-7
10b
–10.3
1.52
2.00
12b
–8.9
2.07
2.39
12c
–10.7
1.79
2.24
5
–8.8
2.19
2.38
9f
–9.2
1.79
2.24
crystallized inhibitor
–7.6
Inactive compound 9d was not able to maintain the
interaction with key residues in most of the docking poses and showed
variable poses at the interface that could reflect the low stability
and affinity of this compound, as shown in Figure . The long hydrophobic alkyl chain was mainly
found solvent exposed, and this could have affected the stability
of the compound in the binding pocket.
Figure 3
Compound 9d docking conformations.
Compound 9d docking conformations.
Experimental
Section
General
Procedures
The solvent
was purified and dried in the usual way. The boiling range of petroleum
ether used was 40–60 °C. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC)
silica gel 60 F254 plastic plates (E. Merck, layer thickness
0.2 mm) were detected by UV absorption. Elemental analyses were performed
on a Flash EA-1112 instrument at the Microanalytical Laboratory, Faculty
of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. Melting points
were determined on a Buchi 510 melting point apparatus, and the values
are uncorrected. NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker 400 MHz,
and tetramethylsilane (TMS) (0.00 ppm) was used as an internal standard.
2-Chloro-3-phenylquinoxaline (1) was prepared according
to the method described.[32]
Preparation of Phenylquinoxaline-2(1H)-thione
(3)
To a solution of 2-chloro-3-phenylquinoxaline
(1, 2.5 mmol) in CHCl3 (25 mL) was added N-cyclohexyldithiocarbamatecyclohexylammonium salt 2 (0.69 g, 2.5 mmol). The reaction mixture was refluxed at
61 °C for 12 h. The reaction mixture was evaporated under reduced
pressure, and 25 mL of ethanol was added to the solid residue. A yellowish
precipitate was filtered to give the desired product and crystallized
from ethanol. Yield 69%, yellow powder, mp 224–225 °C. 1H NMR spectrum (300 MHz, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)), δ,
ppm (J, Hz): 14.56 (1H, bs, NH), 8.48–8.37
(1H, m, ArH), 8.18–8.01 (2H, m, ArH), 7.85–7.78 (1H,
m, ArH), 7.41–7.33 (5H, m, ArH). Found, %: C, 70.13; H, 3.84;
N, 11.29. For C14H10N2S (236.1).
Calcd, %: C, 70.56; H, 4.23; N, 11.76.
General
Procedure for Alkylation
To a mixture of quinoxaline 3 (0.24 g, 1.0 mmol) and
triethylamine (0.2 mL, 2.0 mmol) in ethyl alcohol (30 mL, 95%), alkylating
agents (chloroacetonitrile, 2-bromo-1-phenyl-ethanone, allyl bromide,
and/or ethyl chloroacetate) (1.0 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture
was heated under reflux for 12 h and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The solid obtained was filtered and crystallized from ethyl alcohol.
Hydrazine hydrate (80%, 2.4
mL, 5 mmol) was added to a solution of ester 5 (0.33
g, 1.0 mmol) in absolute ethanol (30 mL). The reaction mixture was
refluxed for 4 h and cooled. The resultant precipitate was filtered
off, washed with ethanol and diethyl ether, and then crystallized
from aqueous ethanol to yield the corresponding hydrazide.Yield
82%, yellow powder, mp 166–168 °C. 1H NMR spectrum
(300 MHz, CDCl3), δ, ppm (J, Hz):
9.36 (1H, bs, NH), 8.05–8.02 (2H, m, ArH), 7.85–7.80
(4H, m, ArH), 7.18–7.16 (3H, m, ArH), 4.39 (2H, bs, NH2), 3.98 (2H, s, SCH2). 13C NMR spectrum
(75.0 MHz, CDCl3), δ, ppm: 171.2 (C=O). 153.3,
153.2, 141.7, 139.5, 136.7, 129.8, 129.3, 129.1, 128.7, 127.8, 34.5
(SCH2). MS (MALDI, positive mode, matrix DHB) m/z: 333 (M + Na)+. Found, % C, 61.87;
H, 4.63; N, 18.11. For C16H14N4OS
(310.4). Calcd % C, 61.92; H, 4.55; N, 18.05; S, 10.33.
Preparation of Methyl-2-[2-(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-ylsulfanyl)acetylamino]alkanoates 8a–c and N-Alkyl-[2-(3-phenyl-quinoxalin-2-
ylsulfanyl)]acetamides 9a–i
General method: A solution of NaNO2 (0.34 g, 5.0 mmol)
in cold water (3 mL) was added to a cold solution (−5 °C)
of hydrazide 6 (0.31 g, 1.0 mmol) in AcOH (6 mL), 1 N
HCl (3 mL), and water (25 mL). After stirring at −5 °C
for 15 min, a yellowish syrup started to form. The reaction mixture
was stirred in an ice bath for another 1 h. The reaction mixture was
extracted twice with ethyl acetate (30 mL). The combined organic layer
was washed with 0.5 N HCl (30 mL), 3% NaHCO3 (30 mL), and
H2O (30 mL) and finally dried over Na2SO4 (10 g) to give an ethyl acetate solution of azide 7. A solution of an appropriate amino acid ester hydrochloride (1.0
mmol) in ethyl acetate (20 mL) containing triethylamine (0.2 mL, 2
mmol) or the appropriate alkane amine (1.0 mmol) in ethyl acetate
(20 mL) was added to the solution of azide 7. The mixture
was kept at −5 °C for 24 h and then at 25 °C for
another 24 h, followed by washing with 0.5 N HCl (30 mL), 3% NaHCO3 (30 mL), and H2O (30 mL), and finally dried over
Na2SO4 (10 g). The solution was evaporated to
dryness, and the residue was recrystallized from petroleum ether–ethyl
acetate, 1:3, to give desired S-coupled products 8a–c and 9a–i.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of
Hydrazides 10a and 10b
Hydrazine
hydrate (80%, 5 mmol) was added to a solution of esters 8a and b (1.0 mmol) in absolute ethanol (30 mL). The reaction
mixture was refluxed for 4 h and cooled. The resultant precipitate
was filtered off, washed with ethanol and diethyl ether, and then
crystallized from aqueous ethanol to yield the corresponding hydrazide.
Human embryonic kidney
cells (HEK-293), human colorectal (HCT-116) carcinoma cells, and human
adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells were cultured in the media containing
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), (10%) l-glutamine, (10%) fetal bovine serum (FBS), (10%) selenium
chloride, and (120 unit/mL) penicillin/streptomycin. The cultures
were placed in a CO2 (5%) incubator (Thermo Scientific
Heracell-150) at 37 °C to achieve 70–80% confluence and
thereafter exposed to different concentrations (2–40 μg/mL)
of 27 synthetic compounds for 48 h. After this, cell cultures were
incubated with MTT (5.0 mg/mL) for 4 h. DMSO was added to each well,
plates were read at 570 nm using an ELISA plate reader (Biotek Instruments,
Winooski), and % cell viability was calculated.
Microscopic Analysis
All cells
(HCT-116, MCF-7, and HEK-293) were observed under different magnifications
of an inverted microscope (TS-100F-Eclipse, Nikon, Japan). The structural
morphology of both treated and untreated cells was observed, and the
structural morphological difference between cancerous cells (HCT-116
and MCF-7) and healthy normal cells (HEK-293) was also examined.
Statistical Evaluation
The mean
± standard deviation (SD) from the control and treated groups
was calculated. All statistical analyses were completed with GraphPad
Prism 6 (GraphPad Software). The difference between control and compound 1, 2, and 3 treated groups was calculated
by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and p-values
were calculated by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Molecular Modeling
All molecular
modeling studies were performed on a Hewlett–Packard Pentium
Dual-Core T4300 2.10 GHz running Windows 10 using Molecular Operating
Environment (AUTODOCK) 2008.10 molecular modeling software for molecular
docking simulations and ligand binding energy calculations and Pymol
for output data visualization and figure generation. The crystal structure
of the human TS dimer bound to a short peptide LSCQLYQR (PDB code: 3N5E) was chosen as a
receptor. This structure was a homodimer in its closed conformation
and represented the inactive conformation of the enzyme. The putative
ligand binding site was assigned based on the positions of the heavy
atoms of the peptide reported.[33] The selected
targets were used after deleting the cocrystallized inhibitors, all
hydrogens were added to the ligand PDB file, and partial charges were
computed. Docking was performed using an AUTODOCK dock tool in AUTODOCK
and performed with default values. Amino acid residues involved in
binding the cocrystallized ligand were used to define the active site
for ligand binding.The docking results were evaluated using
binding energy calculation in AUTODOCK and checking the ligand binding
position through interaction with key residues and were further validated
through comparative docking with the crystallized ligand position
in Pymol.
Conclusions
The
results of the biological testing and molecular docking studies
showed that the designed and synthesized quinoxaline peptidomimetics
possess good antiproliferative activity, particularly against breast
cancer hepatic carcinoma, and apparent selectivity that is potentially
mediated through binding the hTS homodimer interface and stabilizing
its inactive conformation. The compounds are also peptidomimetic in
nature and therefore are suitable for further pharmaceutical and preclinical
development.
Authors: Xu Hui; Julie Desrivot; Christian Bories; Philippe M Loiseau; Xavier Franck; Reynald Hocquemiller; Bruno Figadère Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2005-11-23 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Aliya M S El Newahie; Yassin M Nissan; Nasser S M Ismail; Dalal A Abou El Ella; Sohair M Khojah; Khaled A M Abouzid Journal: Molecules Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: J Harmenberg; A Akesson-Johansson; A Gräslund; T Malmfors; J Bergman; B Wahren; S Akerfeldt; L Lundblad; S Cox Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 1991 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Aliya M S El Newahie; Nasser S M Ismail; Dalal A Abou El Ella; Khaled A M Abouzid Journal: Arch Pharm (Weinheim) Date: 2016-04-09 Impact factor: 3.751