Literature DB >> 36186570

Noncanonical Functions of Enzyme Cofactors as Building Blocks in Natural Product Biosynthesis.

Lena Barra1,2, Takayoshi Awakawa1,3, Ikuro Abe1,3.   

Abstract

Enzymes involved in secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways have typically evolutionarily diverged from their counterparts functioning in primary metabolism. They often catalyze diverse and complex chemical transformations and are thus a treasure trove for the discovery of unique enzyme-mediated chemistries. Besides major natural product classes, such as terpenoids, polyketides, and ribosomally or nonribosomally synthesized peptides, biosynthetic investigations of noncanonical natural product biosynthetic pathways often reveal functionally distinct enzyme chemistries. In this Perspective, we aim to highlight challenges and opportunities of biosynthetic investigations on noncanonical natural product pathways that utilize primary metabolites as building blocks, otherwise generally considered as enzyme cofactors. A focus is made on the discovered chemical and enzymological novelties.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36186570      PMCID: PMC9516700          DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACS Au        ISSN: 2691-3704


Introduction

Natural products are indispensable small molecules that equip human societies with highly potent chemical entities to combat infectious and immunological diseases and carcinosis or help to protect crops for the food supply. These secondary metabolites exhibit evolutionary optimized, often spectacular, molecular architectures crafted by specialized enzyme families that channel ubiquitous primary metabolites into secondary metabolic pathways. In recent years much progress has been made toward understanding the genetic and enzymatic basis of major natural product classes, such as polyketides, ribosomally and nonribosomally synthesized peptides, and terpenoids.[1] With this obtained knowledge, many seminal advances in synthetic biology, biocatalysis, and genome-driven natural product discoveries have been made possible. However, besides these intensively investigated natural product classes, arising from typical primary metabolite building blocks such as malonyl-CoA, amino acids, or oligoprenyl diphosphates, many unusual molecular architectures have been discovered in nature.[2] In this Perspective, we aim to discuss recent progress and challenges in understanding the biosynthesis of noncanonical natural product classes, focusing on those metabolically derived from primary metabolites typically known as enzyme cofactors: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), flavin mononucleotide (FMN), and heme.[3] First, an overview and summary of selected examples is given with a focus on the novel enzyme-mediated reactions of the discovered pathways. Subsequently, a conclusion and perspective on future potential in terms of synthetic biology, biocatalysis, and natural product discovery is discussed.

Enzyme Cofactors

According to the UniProt database,[4] enzyme cofactors are defined as “any non-protein substance required for a protein to be catalytically active. Some cofactors are inorganic, such as the metal atoms zinc, iron, and copper in various oxidation states. Others, such as most vitamins, are organic. Cofactors are generally either bound tightly to active sites or may bind loosely with the enzyme. They may also be important for structural integrity, i.e. if they are not present, the enzyme does not fold properly or becomes unstable.” These are the functions typically taught in biochemistry textbooks and which we regard here as canonical cofactor functions. Furthermore, cofactors can also be classified according to their chemical nature (inorganic vs organic), their binding modes (cosubstrate vs prosthetic group), or their general reaction modes (group-transferring vs self-regenerating). For a thorough synopsis and holistic view on the definition and categorization of enzyme cofactors the reader is referred to Richter.[5] In this article, we highlight selected recent and classical examples of cofactors exhibiting building block-delivery functions in natural product biosynthetic pathways and hence function as substrates during enzyme catalysis.

NAD

NAD (1) is a ubiquitous metabolite and primarily functions as a diffusible electron carrier in catabolic metabolism with cell concentrations in the mM range.[3,6] In this context, as well as in various other enzyme-mediated redox reactions, NAD is utilized as an enzyme redox cofactor and accepts hydrides from the enzyme substrates (e.g., alcohols) undergoing oxidation at C4 (Figure ). NAD is composed of a dinucleotide framework in which the activated pyridinium moiety of nicotinamide is well-known to facilitate nucleophilic addition at C4, as described for redox cofactor properties, or inter- and intramolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at C1′, resulting in the ADP-ribosylation of acceptor substrates (Figure ). The latter reaction mode is the basis for several important biological processes, such as post-translational protein modifications (protein deacylation, mono- and poly ADP-ribosylations), or the formation of signaling molecules, such as cyclic ADP-ribose (cADP) by CD38.[6] Only recently has the importance of NAD for DNA and RNA modifications been elucidated on a molecular level;[7,8] however, detailed knowledge on the biological function of these NAD-modified macromolecules is still lacking. NAD-dependent processes are thus directly linked to cellular signaling, DNA repair, epigenetic modifications, stress and immune response, as well as aging and senescence.[9] Besides the recently discovered function of NAD as a building block in natural product biosynthesis,[10] the ribosyl residue of NAD is known to be utilized for the biosynthesis of another cofactor: thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP).[11]
Figure 1

Canonical redox cofactor function and substrate-like nonredox role of NAD (1) in inter- and intramolecular ADP-ribosyl-transfer reactions.

Canonical redox cofactor function and substrate-like nonredox role of NAD (1) in inter- and intramolecular ADP-ribosyl-transfer reactions.

NAD-Derived Altemicidin, SB-203207, and SB-203208

We recently established that NAD has building block-delivery function for the biosynthesis of a novel class of natural products.[10] In the discovered pathway, the nicotinamide portion of NAD is heavily decorated and the ADP-ribosyl residue subsequently removed to result in the generation of structurally unique 6-azatetrahydroindane natural products altemicidin[12] (2), SB-203207 (3), and SB-203208[13] (4) (Figure a). The identification of the designated biosynthetic gene cluster, which lacked common core biosynthetic enzymes typically associated with the scaffold formation of canonical natural products (e.g., terpene synthases, polyketide synthase, or nonribosomal peptide synthetases) and could thus not be identified by standard genome mining strategies utilizing a natural product class-specific bait sequence, was enabled by a resistance gene-guided genome mining strategy.[14] Since 3 and 4 are potent isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (ITS) inhibitors, we queried the genome of the producing organism Streptomyces sp. NCIMB40513 for copies of the housekeeping ITS gene. Indeed, a paralog of the ITS gene is incorporated in an 18 orf gene cluster, which was confirmed to contain all genes required for the biosynthesis of 2, 3, and 4 by heterologous expression in Streptomyces lividans TK21. Based on the annotation of encoded aminoacyltransferase enzymes, the side-chain tailoring steps, namely the generation and installation of the sulfamoyl and β-methyl phenylalanine residues, were established, leaving six gene products potentially involved in the 6-azatetrahydroindane core scaffold formation (Figure b). Since the remaining gene products do not exhibit significant homology to known enzymes from other natural product pathways, the elucidation of their functions was challenging.
Figure 2

(a) NAD-derived natural products altemicidin (2), SB-203207 (3), and SB-203208 (4). (b) Overview of key enzymes involved in the discovered NAD-utilizing biosynthetic pathway. (c) Biosynthetic pathway toward 4 from NAD (1) and SAM (6). α-KG = α-ketoglutarate-dependent oxygenase, GNAT = Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase, SIS = sugar isomerase protein, BtpA = BtpA protein family, F420 = F420-dependent oxidoreductase, SAM = SAM-dependent methyltransferase, AcT = acyltransferase.

(a) NAD-derived natural products altemicidin (2), SB-203207 (3), and SB-203208 (4). (b) Overview of key enzymes involved in the discovered NAD-utilizing biosynthetic pathway. (c) Biosynthetic pathway toward 4 from NAD (1) and SAM (6). α-KG = α-ketoglutarate-dependent oxygenase, GNAT = Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase, SIS = sugar isomerase protein, BtpA = BtpA protein family, F420 = F420-dependent oxidoreductase, SAM = SAM-dependent methyltransferase, AcT = acyltransferase. Initial feeding experiments with isotopically labeled precursors suggested two aspartate and one C3-sugar-derived building block. However, attempts to reconstitute the pathway utilizing various potential primary metabolites in combination with the six candidate enzymes in vitro were unsuccessful. A key experiment comprised the identification of the gatekeeping enzyme, catalyzing the first committed step in the pathway by utilizing specific building blocks from primary metabolism and converting them to the first pathway intermediate. Therefore, single gene expression strains of the six candidate enzymes were constructed and subjected to an untargeted metabolomics analysis, leading to the identification of nucleoside 5, accumulating in the strain expressing SbzP (Figure c). The results established that merely the PLP-dependent enzyme SbzP is required for the scaffold assembly and suggested an unforeseen nucleotide metabolic origin. Retrobiosynthetic considerations, based on the structure of 5 in combination with the conducted isotope feeding experiments, finally revealed by in vitro testing that SbzP utilizes NAD (1) and SAM (6) as substrates in a PLP-mediated (3 + 2) cycloaddition (Figure c). These results demonstrated an unprecedented function for NAD in secondary metabolism and revealed a functionally and phylogenetically unique family of PLP-dependent enzymes able to catalyze tandem Cα and Cγ alkylation of the amino acid-like substrate SAM.[10] The structural basis of SbzP catalysis is currently under investigation, but preliminary homology model-based point mutations in combination with isotopic labeling, photospectroscopic, and kinetic experiments support a stepwise Ping-Pong Bi–Bi mechanism as depicted in Figure .[10] Upon binding of the amino acid-like substrate SAM, the external aldimine is formed by transaldimination, followed by quinonoid generation via deprotonation at Cα. Base-mediated β,γ-elimination of methylthioadenosine (MTA) subsequently generates a β,γ-unsaturated quinonoid intermediate, which undergoes nucleophilic addition to C4 of NAD, yielding 1,4-dihydropyridine intermediate I. Addition of the active site lysine residue to C4′ of PLP, facilitates isomerization via reprotonation at Cβ and the resulting iminium intermediate is subsequently attacked by the enamine functionality, resulting in a second C–C bond formation event and generation of intermediate II. Upon deprotonation, the 1,4-dihyropyridine geminal diamine intermediate is produced, leading to release of the enzyme product and regeneration of the internal aldimine species. In general, N-substituted pyridinium salts, such as NAD, are activated for nucleophilic addition to C4, generating reactive nonconjugated enamines (resembling intermediate I), which readily react with electrophiles to yield 3,4-dihydropyridinium species (such as intermediate II).[15] Interestingly, the same overall strategy of dearomative, stepwise (3 + 2) cycloaddition to pyridinium salts has recently been exploited in a total synthesis for 2.[16] However, alternative mechanisms, in which a more concerted process prevails, are currently under further investigation.
Figure 3

Proposed stepwise mechanism of SbzP-mediated (3+2) cycloaddition. R = adenosyldiphosphoribosyl residue.

Proposed stepwise mechanism of SbzP-mediated (3+2) cycloaddition. R = adenosyldiphosphoribosyl residue. Given the structural novelty of the designated NAD-derived intermediate 7, total enzymatic in vitro reconstitution of the downstream pathway revealed several functionally unprecedented enzymes. The catalyzed biosynthetic steps comprise dinucleotide tailoring by SbzQ and SbzI, deadenosyldiphosphoribosylation by the three-enzyme system SbzN, SbzO, and SbzH, 4,5-dihydropyridine reduction by SbzF, further N-methylation by SbzE to yield intermediary altemicidin (2), and terminal side-chain decorations by SbzA and SbzC to produce SB-203208 (4) as the pathway product (Figure c). Noteworthy, the deadenosyldiphosphoribosylation enzymes represent a novel system for the catabolism of dinucleotides and proceeds via sequential diphosphate and glycosidic bond cleavage reactions.[10] All three enzymes, SbzN, SbzO, and SbzH, represent functionally novel enzyme families, and detailed structural and mechanistic investigations to reveal their distinct catalytic functions are currently underway. Genome-mining of publicly available genome databases utilizing SbzP as a bait-sequence revealed that homologues are widely distributed in the bacterial kingdom and encoded in diverse biosynthetic gene clusters (in the following referred to as NAD-BGCs) from actino- (Streptomyces, Nonomuraea, Rhodococcus), chloroflexi-, proteo- (Pseudomonas, Myxobacterium, Phenylobacterium), or cyanobacteria (Nostoc) (Figure ). These findings indicate that structurally distinct novel members of the discovered NAD-derived natural product class are expected to be encoded in Nature. Interestingly, several NAD-BGCs harbor distinct aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (AATS) genes as hypothetical resistance genes, e.g., encoding for isoleucyl-, methionyl-, glutamyl-, cysteinyl-, or tyrosyl-activating enzymes and might thus encode for novel AATS inhibitors with significance as antibiotic[17] and antimalarial drug leads.[18] Furthermore, medicinal chemistry work involving semisynthetic modifications of 7 led to the hypothesis that the unique NAD-derived 6-azatetrahydroindane sulfamoyl scaffold mimics natural aminoacyl adenosine monophosphate (AMP) substrates,[19] which is further reflected by the complementary size and electronic distribution of their respective electrostatic potential surfaces.[16] However, further experimental evidence is currently lacking.
Figure 4

Selected examples of NAD-BGCs. Genes have been grouped and color-coded according to gene product function. Black arrows indicate genes distinct to the Sbz-cluster. Wavy links represent sequence identity of homologous protein groups according to gray shade. Figure was made using Clinker. MeT = methyltransferase, P450 = P450-dependent oxygenase, PLP = PLP-dependent enzyme, PhyH = phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase, DUF = hypothetical protein with unknown domain function, AcT = acyltransferase, NAD = NAD-dependent oxidoreductase, ACP = acyl carrier protein, cupin = cupin domain protein, NRPS = nonribosomal peptide synthetase-like, MFS = major facilitator superfamily transporter, Fe–S = iron–sulfur-binding protein, GlyT = glycosyltransferase, amidoT = amidotransferase.

Selected examples of NAD-BGCs. Genes have been grouped and color-coded according to gene product function. Black arrows indicate genes distinct to the Sbz-cluster. Wavy links represent sequence identity of homologous protein groups according to gray shade. Figure was made using Clinker. MeT = methyltransferase, P450 = P450-dependent oxygenase, PLP = PLP-dependent enzyme, PhyH = phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase, DUF = hypothetical protein with unknown domain function, AcT = acyltransferase, NAD = NAD-dependent oxidoreductase, ACP = acyl carrier protein, cupin = cupin domain protein, NRPS = nonribosomal peptide synthetase-like, MFS = major facilitator superfamily transporter, Fe–S = iron–sulfur-binding protein, GlyT = glycosyltransferase, amidoT = amidotransferase. From an enzyme discovery perspective, SbzP homologues are clustered with various additional biosynthetic enzymes such as P450 monooxygenases (P450), radical SAM enzymes (radSAM), nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), additional PLP-dependent enzymes (PLP), or several hypothetical proteins with so far unknown domain functions (DUF) (Figure ). Thus, NAD-derived natural product pathways represent a yet unexplored enzymatic space with significant potential for the discovery of novel enzyme chemistries.

SAM

S-Adenosyl methionine (SAM, 6) is most commonly known as an enzyme cofactor for methyltransferases with acceptor substrates ranging from DNA, RNA, proteins, phospholipids, and carbohydrates to diverse natural products.[20] SAM is biosynthesized from ATP and l-methionine by SAM-synthase, and cellular concentrations lay in the 10 μM range.[6] The reactive center of SAM constitutes a trivalent sulfonium group, in principle enabling donation of all three substituents as electrophilic alkyl fragments, with methyl group transfer being the most common reaction mode (Figure a). The archetypical reactions comprise nucleophilic substitution with electron-rich centers such as amines, alcohols, or thiols, with C-methylation of acidic C–H-moieties having also been described. Furthermore, SAM has various roles as a building block-delivering cofactor in natural product biosynthetic pathways (Figure b).[5,20]
Figure 5

(a) Structure of SAM (6) and possible alkyl-transfer reactions to nucleophiles. (b) Overview of discussed examples of SAM (6) utilization as a building block.

(a) Structure of SAM (6) and possible alkyl-transfer reactions to nucleophiles. (b) Overview of discussed examples of SAM (6) utilization as a building block.

SAM-Derived Spermidine and Spermine

One prominent example is the formation of ubiquitous polyamines, such as spermidine (13) and spermine (14) (Figure ). Due to their polycationic features at physiological pH, polyamines can interact with negatively charged macromolecules such as DNA, RNA, phospholipids, or proteins and play major roles in processes associated with cell viability, growth, and differentiation.[21] Spermidine and spermine are biosynthesized from putrescine (12) and the methionyl residue of SAM. Initial decarboxylation of SAM by SAM decarboxylase (SAMDC) yields intermediary decarboxy-SAM (11), which is utilized as a substrate for subsequent transfer of the remaining aminopropyl group to putrescine (12) or spermidine (13) as nucleophilic acceptors by spermidine synthase (SpdS) or spermine synthase (SpmS), respectively, generating methylthioadenosine (MTA, 15) as a byproduct (Figure ).[22,23] SAM decarboxylases are pyruvoyl-dependent enzymes, which are activated by an autocatalytic serinolysis reaction and exist as homodimers, consisting of a four-layer αββα sandwich, in which the two β-sheets are interconnected by a single loop.[22] Crystal structures for spermidine synthase are also available and show an enzyme composition of three domains: an N-terminal β-strand domain composed of six β-strands, a central catalytic core domain, exhibiting the canonical methyltransferase fold, and a C-terminal α-helix domain including three α-helices. The human spermidine synthase (HsSpdSyn) exists as a dimer, and the homologous protein from Thermotoga maritima (TmSpdSyn) as a homotetramer, with conserved overall structures.[23] The structural differences of canonical methyltransferases utilizing SAM as substrates (and leading to the donation of the methyl group, instead of the methionyl-derived C3N portion) lies in the smaller binding pocket cavity and a conserved charged aspartate residue.[23]
Figure 6

Biosynthetic pathway of spermidine (13) and spermine (14) from SAM (6). SAMDC = SAM decarboxylase, SpdS = spermidine synthase, SpmS = spermine synthase.

Biosynthetic pathway of spermidine (13) and spermine (14) from SAM (6). SAMDC = SAM decarboxylase, SpdS = spermidine synthase, SpmS = spermine synthase.

SAM-Derived Ethylene Precursor 1-Aminocyclopropylcarboxylic acid (ACC)

Ethylene (16) is an important plant hormone produced by all higher plants that regulates key developmental processes such as germination, ripening of fruits, opening of flowers, or abscission of leaves.[24] The biological significance has been demonstrated by antisense RNA experiments in tomatoes, in which transgenic plants expressing ACCS antisense RNA are not able to ripen without addition of exogenous ethylene.[25] Ethylene is biosynthesized via the Yang cycle from SAM, and the rate-determining step in the pathway is catalyzed by the PLP-dependent enzyme 1-aminocyclopropyl-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACCS), converting SAM into 1-aminocyclopropyl-1-carboxylic acid (ACC, 17).[26] Subsequently ACC is converted to ethylene by 1-aminocyclopropylcarbocylic acid oxidase, generating CO2 and HCN as byproducts (Figure a). Given the importance of ethylene-induced ripening and the rate-limiting properties of ACCS, development of ACCS inhibitors like l-aminoethoxyvinylglycine has attracted considerable attention for agricultural applications.
Figure 7

(a) Biosynthetic steps from SAM (6) to ethylene (16) via PLP-mediated formation of ACC (17). (b) Mechanism of ACCS-mediated PLP-dependent intramolecular cyclopropylation.

(a) Biosynthetic steps from SAM (6) to ethylene (16) via PLP-mediated formation of ACC (17). (b) Mechanism of ACCS-mediated PLP-dependent intramolecular cyclopropylation. The mechanism of ACCS has been studied intensively by, e.g., structure-based site-directed mutagenesis, isotopic labeling, and photospectroscopic tracing of catalytic intermediates.[27−29] The conserved lysine residue, which forms a Schiff base with PLP (internal aldimine) has been identified as Lys273. After binding of SAM by transaldimination, deprotonation at Cα generates a typical quinonoid intermediate. The resonance-stabilized carbanion subsequently undergoes intramolecular nucleophilic substitution at Cγ with concomitant elimination of methylthioadenosine. Finally, the cyclized product is released by transaldimination regenerating the internal aldimine form (Figure b). ACCS belongs to the superfamily of aspartate aminotransferase fold-type I PLP-dependent enzymes (AAT-I) and exists as a functional homodimer. The active site is located close to the subunit interface in a cleft between the archetypical small and large domain. Each domain is composed of a central sheet of β-strands connected by α-helices on both sides. The large domain exhibits a central seven-stranded β-sheet, conserved in structurally characterized family members of the AAT-I superfamily, and the small domain of four-stranded antiparallel and a two-stranded parallel sheet (Figure a).[29]
Figure 8

Protein structures of SAM-utilizing PLP-dependent enzymes ACCS (PDB: 1M7Y) (a) and CqsA (2WK7) (b).

Protein structures of SAM-utilizing PLP-dependent enzymes ACCS (PDB: 1M7Y) (a) and CqsA (2WK7) (b). Interestingly, functional homologues of ACCS (GnmY[30] and orf30[31]) with low primary structure similarity (15%–20% sequence identity) have been identified in biosynthetic pathways toward bacterial guangnanmycins from Streptomyces sp. CB01883 and norcoronamic acid from Streptomyces violaceusniger 4521-SVS3, respectively. Apart from identification of the conserved catalytic lysine residue of GnmY (Lys243), detailed mechanistic investigations have not been reported to date. Both bacterial and plant ACCS phylogenetically belong to the aspartate aminotransferase subfamily of AAT-I (Figure ).
Figure 9

Phylogenetic analysis of discussed SAM-utilizing PLP-dependent enzymes. SAM-utilizing enzymes Mur24, SbzP, GnmY, ACCS, and CqsA are highlighted in red boxes. See ref (10) for methodic details on tree construction.

Phylogenetic analysis of discussed SAM-utilizing PLP-dependent enzymes. SAM-utilizing enzymes Mur24, SbzP, GnmY, ACCS, and CqsA are highlighted in red boxes. See ref (10) for methodic details on tree construction.

SAM-Derived CAI-1 and AI-2

AI-2 (18) and CAI-1 (19) are major autoinducers in the human pathogen Vibrio cholerae and participate in intraspecies quorum sensing signaling pathways to control pathogenicity and biofilm formation.[32,33] Counterintuitively, at low cell density and absence of autoinducers, V. cholerae expresses virulence factors and forms biofilms, behavior which is repressed at high cell densities and autoinducer concentrations. Whereas AI-2 is biosynthesized from (S)-ribosyl-homocysteine,[32,34] a byproduct of SAM metabolism, by LuxS, CAI-1 (19) is directly derived from SAM (Figure b). CAI-1 biosynthesis is mediated by PLP-dependent enzyme CqsA, utilizing SAM and decanoyl coenzyme A (d-CoA) as substrates.[35] A similar autoinducer system and a homologue of CqsA (LqsA) are also present in the human pathogen Legionella pneumophilia, the causative agent of legionellosis.[36] CqsA and homologues belong to the α-oxoamine synthase subfamily (AOS) of AAT-I (Figure ). The protein structure of CqsA has been solved, and the conserved lysine residue responsible for Schiff-base formation with enzyme cofactor PLP was identified as Lys236.[37,38] However, it should be mentioned that at the time point of these structural studies the CqsA substrate was falsely determined as l-aminobutyrate. The proposed CqsA mechanism involves initial formation of the external aldimine upon substrate binding and subsequent formation of a quinonoid species by deprotonation at Cα. Deprotonation-induced β,γ-elimination of methylthioadenosine yields a β,γ-unsaturated quinonoid, undergoing a nucleophilic substitution reaction at the carbonyl moiety of d-CoA to yield a β-ketoacid, prone to subsequent decarboxylation. Penultimate reprotonation at Cγ leads to formation of β,γ-unsaturated quinonoid II with subsequent release of the enzyme product 3-aminotridec-2-en-4-one (Ea-CAI-1, 20) by transaldimination (Figure ). The subsequent transformation of Ea-CAI-1 (20) to CAI-1 (19) has not been elucidated to date.[35] CqsA exists as a homodimer and exhibits archetypical structural elements of the AOS subfamily, comprising three domains: an N-terminal domain of about 55 amino acid residues consisting of a helix followed by random coil, a central catalytic domain, and a C-terminal domain (Figure b).
Figure 10

Proposed mechanism of CqsA-mediated Claisen condensation to produce CAI-1 (19) precursor Ea-CAI-1 (20).

Proposed mechanism of CqsA-mediated Claisen condensation to produce CAI-1 (19) precursor Ea-CAI-1 (20).

SAM-Derived N-Acylhomoserine Lactones

Besides the quorum-sensing molecules CAI-1 and AI-2, N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs) are well-known signaling compounds to sense cell density and control biofilm formation, swarming, and pathogenicity in a wide range of bacteria.[39] One example is N-3-oxo-hexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (OdDHL, 21) produced by Vibrio fischeri, with variations in the acyl chain mediating species-specific communication (Figure b). AHLs are biosynthesized by AHL synthases, belonging to the family of Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferases (GNATs) and catalyze acylation of SAM utilizing acylated acyl carrier proteins as well as intramolecular cyclization (Figure ).[40]
Figure 11

Biosynthesis of AHLs from SAM (6) mediated by AHLS. AHLS = N-acylhomoserine lactone synthase. R = varying alkyl chains.

Biosynthesis of AHLs from SAM (6) mediated by AHLS. AHLS = N-acylhomoserine lactone synthase. R = varying alkyl chains.

SAM-Derived Muraymycins

Muraymycin D1 (22) is a nucleoside antibiotic isolated from Streptomyces spp. that consists of a characteristic N-alkylated 5″-amino-5″-deoxyribose linked to a high-carbon sugar nucleoside C-glycyluridine disaccharide core (Figure b).[41] Muraymycin and structurally related nucleosides target translocase 1 involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. The biosynthetic origin of the C3N fragment, connecting the peptide with the nucleosidic substructure, was recently shown to originate from SAM by van Lanen and co-workers. They identified a PLP-dependent enzyme (Mur24) with a sequence similar to that of SAM-utilizing ACCS and conducted a series of isotopic feeding experiments, revealing l-methionine as an early biosynthetic precursor. Opposed to a reaction sequence with preceding decarboxylation of SAM, followed by alkyl transfer of the C3N group by nucleophilic substitution as in polyamine biosynthesis, it was shown that Mur24 directly utilizes SAM as the native substrate and catalyzes a Cγ-replacement reaction from pathway intermediate 23 to 24 (Figure a). The overall reaction constitutes tandem Cγ-elimination and aza-Michael Cγ-addition (Figure b). The proposed mechanism starts with substrate binding-induced transaldimination to generate the external aldimine and subsequent formation of a corresponding quinonoid species. In the next step, reprotonation at C4′ occurs, separating the conjugated system of the pyridine moiety from the iminium. Subsequent β,γ-elimination yields a β,γ-unsaturated iminium acceptor, facilitating an aza-Michael-like addition of the nucleophilic amine. After Cγ-addition, the proton is removed from C4′, yielding a conjugated quinonoid undergoing reprotonation at Cα and subsequent transaldimination to generate enzyme product 24. The structural basis of Mur24 catalysis has not been established yet; however, involvement of a conserved lysine residue (Lys234), likely involved in PLP binding, has been shown by point mutation experiments. Furthermore, the mechanism has been traced by isotopic labeling experiments, and proposed de- and reprotonation steps are in agreement with incubation of l-(2,3,3,4,4-2H5)methionine-, and l-(2-2H)methionine-derived isotopically labeled SAM, as well the complementary experiment of Mur24 reaction in 2H2O. Interestingly, Mur24 also equally accepted the epimerized, physiologically inactive form of SAM, (R)-SAM, as well as the substrate mimic S-methylmethionine (conversion 9% compared to the natural substrate (S)-SAM).[41]
Figure 12

(a) Mur24-mediated alkylation of 23 toward nucleoside antibiotic muraymycin D1 (22). (b) Proposed mechanism of Mur24-mediated PLP-dependent aminobutyryl-transfer reaction.

(a) Mur24-mediated alkylation of 23 toward nucleoside antibiotic muraymycin D1 (22). (b) Proposed mechanism of Mur24-mediated PLP-dependent aminobutyryl-transfer reaction.

SAM-Derived Salinosporamide

Salinosporamide A (25) from marine Salinispora tropica is a potent 20S proteasome inhibitor currently in phase III human clinical trials for the treatment of glioblastoma.[42−44] The biosynthetic building blocks of 25 are an acetate, cyclohexenylalanine, and chloroethylmalonate, which are assembled by a hybrid polyketide synthase/nonribosomal peptide synthetase (PKS/NRPS).[44] Chloroethylmalonate is hereby derived from SAM (6) and utilized as chloroethylmalonyl-CoA (26) as an extender unit (Figure ). The function of the key enzyme SalL was inferred from its homology to fluorinase FlA (35% sequence identity). FlA is responsible for the formation of fluoroacetate from SAM by fluoride-dependent nucleophilic displacement of l-methionine.[45,46] In a similar mechanism, SalL utilizes chloride to produce 5′-chloro-5′-deoxyadenosine (27), which is subsequently processed to chloroethylmalonyl-CoA.[47,48]
Figure 13

Biosynthetic pathway from SAM (6) to salinosporamide precursor chloroethylmalonyl-CoA (26).

Biosynthetic pathway from SAM (6) to salinosporamide precursor chloroethylmalonyl-CoA (26).

FMN

Riboflavin, also known as vitamin B2, is the direct precursor to coenzymatically active flavin mononucleotide (FMN, 28), generated by riboflavin kinase, and subsequently flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) by the action of FAD synthase.[3] Riboflavins consist of an isoalloxazine ring with a ribityl side chain and modifications of the 5′ end by phosphorylation (FMN) or attachment of adenosine diphosphate (FAD). FMN and FAD are ubiquitous redox cofactors, capable of both two- and one-electron redox steps. They are not diffusible due to their short halflife times and typically bind strongly to their respective enzymes.[6]

Roseoflavin

Roseoflavin (29) is a riboflavin-derived antibiotic isolated from Streptomyces davawensis and Streptomyces cinnabarinus (Figure ).[49] Upon uptake in cells, 29 is metabolized to inhibitory flavin cofactor analogs, which additionally act as repressors of riboflavin biosynthesis and transport.[50] Riboflavin biosynthesis starts from FMN (28) and is facilitated by two discrete enzymes: the methyl transferase RosA[51] and RosB, which were discovered from screening of a cosmid library and systematic gene deletion experiments.[52,53] RosB hereby catalyzes an unprecedented oxidation, decarboxylation, amination reaction sequence to produce 29, dependent on glutamine as the amine donor. RosB did not exhibit homology to previously characterized enzymes and forms a compact tetramer with each subunit consisting of a three-layered α/β fold of the flavodoxin type.[54] The mechanistic details of the complex RosB transformation, as well as contradictory reports on the dependency of RosB on thiamine are not yet fully understood.
Figure 14

Proposed biosynthetic pathway from FMN (28) to roseoflavin (29).

Proposed biosynthetic pathway from FMN (28) to roseoflavin (29).

Heme

Heme (30) is an iron protoporphyrin-IX which works as a cofactor for several oxygenases such as P450 oxygenase and tryptophan dioxygenase (Figure ).[55] Heme binds to iron, and the generated heme-iron reacts with molecular oxygen to produce highly reactive species like compound I in P450 oxygenase. Compound I abstracts a hydrogen atom from the substrate to produce a reactive radical undergoing further transformations. Apart from the role as cofactor, there are several natural products derived from heme biosynthesis or heme catabolite pathway.
Figure 15

(a) Proposed biosynthetic pathway from protoporphyrinogen IX (32) to tolyporphin A (31). (b) Catabolic pathway from heme (30) to biliverdin (33) and anaerobilin (34). 5-dA = 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical.

(a) Proposed biosynthetic pathway from protoporphyrinogen IX (32) to tolyporphin A (31). (b) Catabolic pathway from heme (30) to biliverdin (33) and anaerobilin (34). 5-dA = 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical.

Heme-Derived Tolyporphin

Tolyporphin A (31) and its derivatives were isolated from cyanobacterium species HT-58-2 (Figure a).[56,57] They include characteristic C-glycosidic β-substituents, dioxobacteriochlorin, and gem-dialkyl substituted pyrrole. Interestingly, tolyporphins do not form a complex with Fe(II) like heme, but they form a planar square complex with Cu(II) and Ag(II).[58] The Cu(II) complex of tolyporphin A was reported to possess the intriguing property to reverse multidrug resistance and less toxicity than free tolyporphins.[58] Tolyporphins are expected to be derived from the heme biosynthetic pathway. Because tolyporphin biosynthetic gene cluster includes hem biosynthetic genes hemABCEF1F2, the precursor of tolyprophins is hypothesized to be protoporphyrinogen IX (32) (Figure ).[59] Protoporphyrinogen IX is processed by the several enzymes, and finally C-glycosylated to generate tolyporphin A (31). The further experiments are required to assign the roles of the enzymes which are encoded by the genes in the cluster.

Heme-Derived Biliverdin and Anaerobillin

Biliverdin (33) is the well-known aerobic heme catabolite produced by heme oxygenase in erythrocytes (Figure b).[60] Biliverdin is excessively accumulated in the blood of hepatic disease patients, but it also exhibits antimutagenic and antioxidant properties, leading to a benefitable physiological function.[61] Anaerobillin (34) is a rare anaerobic heme catabolite produced by Escherichia coli O157:H7.[62] This compound was discovered in the reaction by a radical-SAM enzyme ChuW whose gene was focused in the operon encodes genes for the heme uptake and transport. A radical-SAM methyltransferase ChuW opens the porphyrin macrocycle of heme to release iron to produce the reactive tetrapyrrole scaffold of anaerobilin.[62,63] This is a strategy to obtain Fe in anaerobic gut conditions. Anaerobin is reduced to anaerorubin by NADPH-dependent reductase ChuY.[64] The structures of anaerobilin and anaerorubin are proposed from MS and UV spectral analyses, as their instability precluded NMR analysis. The biological functions of anaerobilin and anaerorubin are still unknown.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

As elaborated in the preceding chapters, enzyme cofactors can serve as building blocks for the generation of unique specialized small molecules with diverse biological and potent pharmaceutical functions, ranging from signaling molecules, hormones, and antibiotics to anticancer drugs. Whereas some of these secondary metabolites still resemble the structural features of their biosynthetic precursors [e.g., roseoflavin (29) or tolyporphin (31)], other pathways produce highly modified metabolites, making a direct correlation challenging [e.g., SB-203207 (4), muraymycine D1 (22), or salinosporamide (24)] and require specialized experimentation combining several methodologies, e.g. bioinformatics, untargeted metabolomics, isotope feeding, and in vitro substrate screening with recombinant enzymes. However, as illustrated for the recent discovery of the first NAD-derived natural product pathway, detailed biosynthetic investigations on genetic and enzymatic level have major potential to enable identification of novel gatekeeping enzymes, which can subsequently serve as bait sequences for the exploitation of untapped natural product space by genome mining strategies. Although challenging, we believe that biosynthetic investigations of noncanonical natural products will enable significant expansion of our current chemical and enzymatic understanding of biosynthetic machineries and will facilitate the identification of structurally and functionally unprecedented metabolites. Furthermore, the discussed biosynthetic enzymes utilizing cofactors as substrates often represent functionally and structurally unique biocatalysts with the ability to catalyze intriguing C–C bond forming reactions. A detailed understanding of their mechanism on a molecular level by e.g. structure-based investigations, isotopic labeling and other techniques is required to lay the basis for future developments of novel, sustainable, enzyme-based synthesis tools. Especially in combination with recent advances in the field of enzyme engineering by directed evolution and computer-assisted rational design, we believe that cofactor-utilizing pathways harbor great potential for the discovery of unique enzyme templates to advance for synthetic purposes. Additionally, their inherent abilities to selectively modify vital primary metabolites (e.g., SbzP represents the first enzyme capable to tailor the pyridinium moiety of NAD) make them attractive targets for the development of genetically tractable probes to investigate key cellular processes. Although expanding, our current understanding of cofactor-derived natural products is still limited to only a few distinct examples, which predominantly have been discovered from bacterial metabolism. As bacteria represent the currently most well investigated organisms in the field of natural product research, we are curious to raise the question whether similar biosynthetic potential is hidden in other resources, e.g., archaea, fungi, plants, or metagenomic data. As genomic and transcriptomic technologies, as well as genetic tools for manipulation continue to advance, we envision that further intriguing and potent examples of cofactor-derived secondary metabolites associated with novel biosynthetic enzymes will become evident in the future and fuel the field of natural product discovery, biocatalysis development, and synthetic biology.
  59 in total

1.  Structure of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase, a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of the plant hormone ethylene.

Authors:  G Capitani; E Hohenester; L Feng; P Storici; J F Kirsch; J N Jansonius
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Structural biology of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase.

Authors:  Shridhar Bale; Steven E Ealick
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.520

3.  Isolation, chemical synthesis, and properties of roseoflavin.

Authors:  S Otani; S Kasai; K Matsui
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Tolyporphin Macrocycles from the Cyanobacterium Tolypothrix nodosa Selectively Bind Copper and Silver and Reverse Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  Michèle R Prinsep; Trevor G Appleton; Graeme R Hanson; Ian Lane; Charles D Smith; Jonathan Puddick; David P Fairlie
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  SB-203207 and SB-203208, two novel isoleucyl tRNA synthetase inhibitors from a Streptomyces sp. I. Fermentation, isolation and properties.

Authors:  A L Stefanska; R Cassels; S J Ready; S R Warr
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  A Remarkable Oxidative Cascade That Replaces the Riboflavin C8 Methyl with an Amino Group during Roseoflavin Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Isita Jhulki; Prem K Chanani; Sameh H Abdelwahed; Tadhg P Begley
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Functional diversity of organic molecule enzyme cofactors.

Authors:  Michael Richter
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 13.423

8.  Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt).

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Dearomative Synthetic Entry into the Altemicidin Alkaloids.

Authors:  Claire S Harmange Magnani; Thomas J Maimone
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 16.383

Review 10.  The regulation of ethylene biosynthesis: a complex multilevel control circuitry.

Authors:  Jolien Pattyn; John Vaughan-Hirsch; Bram Van de Poel
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 10.323

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.