Literature DB >> 11572364

Spatial and temporal factors in auditory saltation.

D P Phillips1, S E Hall.   

Abstract

This report describes three experiments on auditory saltation, studied with click stimuli presented at interclick intervals (ICIs) from 30 to 240 ms. In experiment 1, subjects rated the strength of the saltation illusion evoked by trains of six monaural clicks (i.e., three presented to one ear followed by three to the other ear), and six dichotic clicks on which were imposed either a 500-micros interaural time difference or a 9-dB interaural level difference (ILD). The interaural disparity of theclicks was reversed at the midpoint of the train. Subjects reported equivalent strengths of saltation for the dichotic clicks, but weaker saltation for the monaural ones. These data indicated that saltation is supported by dichotic clicks, regardless of the stimulus manipulation used to generate the lateralized images. In experiment 2, subjects rated the strength of the saltation evoked by six click trains lateralized, in separate trials, by ILDs ranging from 9 to 30 dB, and by a train of monaural clicks. In all ILD conditions, the level of the clicks at the "quiet" ear was above click-detection threshold when presented monaurally. Saltation weakened with increasing ILD, and approximated that seen with monaural clicks when the ILD was 30 dB. These data indicated that for the range of ICIs used here, saltation weakened as the stimuli became more strongly lateralized. In experiment 3, the number of dichotic clicks preceding the disparity reversal was, in separate trials, varied from 3 to 10, and subjects were asked to detect the presence of spatial stationarity in the click train. By plotting the subjective ratings as a function of the length of the leading click train, it was shown that the temporal window within which the saltation effect operates varies between listeners, but is usually less than about 350-400 ms.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572364     DOI: 10.1121/1.1396329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  When does visual perceptual grouping affect multisensory integration?

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jason S Chan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.

Authors:  Adrian Y Cho; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Saltation in pitch perception.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Effects of fusion between tactile and proprioceptive inputs on tactile perception.

Authors:  Jay P Warren; Marco Santello; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatiotemporal integration in somatosensory perception: effects of sensory saltation on pointing at perceived positions on the body surface.

Authors:  Jörg Trojan; Annette M Stolle; Antonija Mršić Carl; Dieter Kleinböhl; Hong Z Tan; Rupert Hölzl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-13

Review 7.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.