Literature DB >> 33589889

Interactions among talker sex, masker number, and masker intelligibility in speech-on-speech recognition.

Mathew Thomas1, John J Galvin2, Qian-Jie Fu1.   

Abstract

In competing speech, recognition of target speech may be limited by the number and characteristics of maskers, which produce energetic, envelope, and/or informational masking. In this study, speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were measured with one, two, or four maskers. The target and masker sex was the same or different, and SRTs were measured with time-forward or time-reversed maskers. SRTs were significantly affected by target-masker sex differences with time-forward maskers, but not with time-reversed maskers. The multi-masker penalty was much greater with time-reversed maskers than with time-forward maskers when there were more than two talkers.
© 2021 Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33589889      PMCID: PMC7850016          DOI: 10.1121/10.0003051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JASA Express Lett


  19 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory masking: need for improved conceptual structure.

Authors:  Nat Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Xing Wang; Ning-Yu Wang; Xin Fu; Tian Gan; John J Galvin; Shelby Willis; Kevin Xu; Mathew Thomas; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The North American Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences test (NA LiSN-S): normative data and test-retest reliability studies for adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  David K Brown; Sharon Cameron; Jeffrey S Martin; Charlene Watson; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Kameron K Clayton; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking Effects in the Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Talkers in Normal-Hearing and Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Biao Chen; Ying Shi; Lifang Zhang; Zhiming Sun; Yongxin Li; Quinton Gopen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.

Authors:  Adrian Y Cho; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.