Literature DB >> 36175455

Assessing a megadiverse but poorly known community of fishes in a tropical mangrove estuary through environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding.

Danial Hariz Zainal Abidin1, Siti Azizah Mohd Nor2, Sébastien Lavoué3, Masazurah A Rahim4, Noor Adelyna Mohammed Akib5,6.   

Abstract

Biodiversity surveys are crucial for monitoring the status of threatened aquatic ecosystems, such as tropical estuaries and mangroves. Conventional monitoring methods are intrusive, time-consuming, substantially expensive, and often provide only rough estimates in complex habitats. An advanced monitoring approach, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, is promising, although only few applications in tropical mangrove estuaries have been reported. In this study, we explore the advantages and limitations of an eDNA metabarcoding survey on the fish community of the Merbok Estuary (Peninsular Malaysia). COI and 12S eDNA metabarcoding assays collectively detected 178 species from 127 genera, 68 families, and 25 orders. Using this approach, significantly more species have been detected in the Merbok Estuary over the past decade (2010-2019) than in conventional surveys, including several species of conservation importance. However, we highlight three limitations: (1) in the absence of a comprehensive reference database the identities of several species are unresolved; (2) some of the previously documented specimen-based diversity was not captured by the current method, perhaps as a consequence of PCR primer specificity, and (3) the detection of non-resident species-stenohaline freshwater taxa (e.g., cyprinids, channids, osphronemids) and marine coral reef taxa (e.g., holocentrids, some syngnathids and sharks), not known to frequent estuaries, leading to the supposition that their DNA have drifted into the estuary through water movements. The community analysis revealed that fish diversity along the Merbok Estuary is not homogenous, with the upstream more diverse than further downstream. This could be due to the different landscapes or degree of anthropogenic influences along the estuary. In summary, we demonstrated the practicality of eDNA metabarcoding in assessing fish community and structure within a complex and rich tropical environment within a short sampling period. However, some limitations need to be considered and addressed to fully exploit the efficacy of this approach.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36175455      PMCID: PMC9523059          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19954-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  34 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Environmental DNA.

Authors:  Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Diversity, extinction risk and conservation of Malaysian fishes.

Authors:  V C Chong; P K Y Lee; C M Lau
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.051

Review 4.  Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Margaret Branton; John S Richardson
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Alice Valentini; Pierre Taberlet; Claude Miaud; Raphaël Civade; Jelger Herder; Philip Francis Thomsen; Eva Bellemain; Aurélien Besnard; Eric Coissac; Frédéric Boyer; Coline Gaboriaud; Pauline Jean; Nicolas Poulet; Nicolas Roset; Gordon H Copp; Philippe Geniez; Didier Pont; Christine Argillier; Jean-Marc Baudoin; Tiphaine Peroux; Alain J Crivelli; Anthony Olivier; Manon Acqueberge; Matthieu Le Brun; Peter R Møller; Eske Willerslev; Tony Dejean
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  A baseline measure of tree and gastropod biodiversity in replanted and natural mangrove stands in malaysia: langkawi island and sungai merbok.

Authors:  Brenda Hookham; Aileen Tan Shau-Hwai; Benoit Dayrat; William Hintz
Journal:  Trop Life Sci Res       Date:  2014-08

Review 7.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring.

Authors:  Kristine Bohmann; Alice Evans; M Thomas P Gilbert; Gary R Carvalho; Simon Creer; Michael Knapp; Douglas W Yu; Mark de Bruyn
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Environmental DNA effectively captures functional diversity of coastal fish communities.

Authors:  Giorgio Aglieri; Charles Baillie; Stefano Mariani; Carlo Cattano; Antonio Calò; Gabriele Turco; Davide Spatafora; Antonio Di Franco; Manfredi Di Lorenzo; Paolo Guidetti; Marco Milazzo
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 9.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

Authors:  David Dudgeon; Angela H Arthington; Mark O Gessner; Zen-Ichiro Kawabata; Duncan J Knowler; Christian Lévêque; Robert J Naiman; Anne-Hélène Prieur-Richard; Doris Soto; Melanie L J Stiassny; Caroline A Sullivan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.