Literature DB >> 21091767

Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis.

Margaret Branton1, John S Richardson.   

Abstract

The umbrella-species concept, which suggests that conservation strategies designed for one species may benefit co-occurring species, has been promoted as a framework for conservation planning. Nevertheless, there has been considerable variation in the outcome of empirical tests of this concept that has led researchers to question its value, so we used data from 15 published studies in a meta-analysis to evaluate whether conservation of putative umbrella species also conserves co-occurring species. We tested the effectiveness of putative umbrella species categorized by taxonomic group, taxonomic similarity to co-occurring species, body size, generality of resource use, and trophic level to evaluate criteria proposed to guide the selection of umbrella species. We compared species richness and number of individuals (by species and higher taxonomic group) between sites with and without putative umbrella species to test whether more co-occurring species were present in greater abundances when the area or resource needs of umbrella species were met. Species richness and abundance of co-occurring species were consistently higher in sites where umbrella species were present than where they were not and for conservation schemes with avian than with mammalian umbrella species. There were no differences in species richness or species abundance with resource generalist or specialist umbrella species or based on taxonomic similarity of umbrella and co-occurring species. Taxonomic group abundance was higher in across-taxonomic umbrella species schemes than when umbrella species were of the same taxon as co-occurring species. Co-occurring species had similar, or higher, species richness with small-bodied umbrella species relative to larger-bodied umbrella species. The only significant difference among umbrella species categorized by trophic level was that species richness was higher with omnivorous than it was with carnivorous avian umbrella species. Our results suggest there is merit to the umbrella-species concept for conservation, but they do not support the use of the criteria we used to identify umbrella species. ©2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091767     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01606.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  15 in total

1.  Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation.

Authors:  Joseph R Bennett; Richard Maloney; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Similar local and landscape processes affect both a common and a rare newt species.

Authors:  Mathieu Denoël; Amélie Perez; Yves Cornet; Gentile Francesco Ficetola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Distribution of wild mammal assemblages along an urban-rural-forest landscape gradient in warm-temperate East Asia.

Authors:  Masayuki Saito; Fumito Koike
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of methodological and ecological approaches on heterogeneity of nest-site selection of a long-lived vulture.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Opo; Mariana Fernández-Olalla; Antoni Margalida; Ángel Arredondo; Francisco Guil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Emerging ecosystems change the spatial distribution of top carnivores even in poorly populated areas.

Authors:  Facundo Barbar; Victoria Werenkraut; Juan Manuel Morales; Sergio Agustín Lambertucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Freshwater Megafauna: Flagships for Freshwater Biodiversity under Threat.

Authors:  Savrina F Carrizo; Sonja C Jähnig; Vanessa Bremerich; Jörg Freyhof; Ian Harrison; Fengzhi He; Simone D Langhans; Klement Tockner; Christiane Zarfl; William Darwall
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 8.589

7.  Single species conservation as an umbrella for management of landscape threats.

Authors:  Claire A Runge; John C Withey; David E Naugle; Joseph E Fargione; Kate J Helmstedt; Ashley E Larsen; Sebastian Martinuzzi; Jason D Tack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Anguillid eels as a surrogate species for conservation of freshwater biodiversity in Japan.

Authors:  Hikaru Itakura; Ryoshiro Wakiya; Matthew Gollock; Kenzo Kaifu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Using Sex Pheromone and a Multi-Scale Approach to Predict the Distribution of a Rare Saproxylic Beetle.

Authors:  Najihah Musa; Klas Andersson; Joseph Burman; Fredrik Andersson; Erik Hedenström; Nicklas Jansson; Heidi Paltto; Lars Westerberg; Inis Winde; Mattias C Larsson; Karl-Olof Bergman; Per Milberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Global priorities for national carnivore conservation under land use change.

Authors:  Enrico Di Minin; Rob Slotow; Luke T B Hunter; Federico Montesino Pouzols; Tuuli Toivonen; Peter H Verburg; Nigel Leader-Williams; Lisanne Petracca; Atte Moilanen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.