Literature DB >> 26479867

Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.

Alice Valentini1, Pierre Taberlet2,3, Claude Miaud4, Raphaël Civade5, Jelger Herder6, Philip Francis Thomsen7, Eva Bellemain1, Aurélien Besnard4, Eric Coissac2,3, Frédéric Boyer2,3, Coline Gaboriaud1, Pauline Jean1, Nicolas Poulet8, Nicolas Roset9, Gordon H Copp10,11, Philippe Geniez4, Didier Pont5, Christine Argillier12, Jean-Marc Baudoin12, Tiphaine Peroux12, Alain J Crivelli13, Anthony Olivier13, Manon Acqueberge14, Matthieu Le Brun15, Peter R Møller16, Eske Willerslev7, Tony Dejean1.   

Abstract

Global biodiversity in freshwater and the oceans is declining at high rates. Reliable tools for assessing and monitoring aquatic biodiversity, especially for rare and secretive species, are important for efficient and timely management. Recent advances in DNA sequencing have provided a new tool for species detection from DNA present in the environment. In this study, we tested whether an environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach, using water samples, can be used for addressing significant questions in ecology and conservation. Two key aquatic vertebrate groups were targeted: amphibians and bony fish. The reliability of this method was cautiously validated in silico, in vitro and in situ. When compared with traditional surveys or historical data, eDNA metabarcoding showed a much better detection probability overall. For amphibians, the detection probability with eDNA metabarcoding was 0.97 (CI = 0.90-0.99) vs. 0.58 (CI = 0.50-0.63) for traditional surveys. For fish, in 89% of the studied sites, the number of taxa detected using the eDNA metabarcoding approach was higher or identical to the number detected using traditional methods. We argue that the proposed DNA-based approach has the potential to become the next-generation tool for ecological studies and standardized biodiversity monitoring in a wide range of aquatic ecosystems.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  amphibian; detection probability; environmental DNA; fish; monitoring; wildlife management

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26479867     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  128 in total

1.  Accumulation curves of environmental DNA sequences predict coastal fish diversity in the coral triangle.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Juhel; Rizkie S Utama; Virginie Marques; Indra B Vimono; Hagi Yulia Sugeha; Laurent Pouyaud; Tony Dejean; David Mouillot; Régis Hocdé
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Early detection monitoring for aquatic non-indigenous species: Optimizing surveillance, incorporating advanced technologies, and identifying research needs.

Authors:  Anett S Trebitz; Joel C Hoffman; John A Darling; Erik M Pilgrim; John R Kelly; Emily A Brown; W Lindsay Chadderton; Scott P Egan; Erin K Grey; Syed A Hashsham; Katy E Klymus; Andrew R Mahon; Jeffrey L Ram; Martin T Schultz; Carol A Stepien; James C Schardt
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Environmental DNA for improved detection and environmental surveillance of schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Mita E Sengupta; Micaela Hellström; Henry C Kariuki; Annette Olsen; Philip F Thomsen; Helena Mejer; Eske Willerslev; Mariam T Mwanje; Henry Madsen; Thomas K Kristensen; Anna-Sofie Stensgaard; Birgitte J Vennervald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Preliminary study on microeukaryotic community analysis using NGS technology to determine postmortem submersion interval (PMSI) in the drowned pig.

Authors:  Cheol-Ho Hyun; Heesoo Kim; Seongho Ryu; Won Kim
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.422

5.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of a freshwater eukaryotic plankton community revealed via 18S rRNA gene metabarcoding.

Authors:  A Banerji; M Bagley; M Elk; E Pilgrim; J Marinson; J Santo Domingo
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA.

Authors:  Masaki Miya; Toshifumi Minamoto; Hiroki Yamanaka; Shin-Ichiro Oka; Keiichi Sato; Satoshi Yamamoto; Tetsuya Sado; Hideyuki Doi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Using eDNA techniques to find the endangered big-headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum).

Authors:  Ivan P Y Lam; Yik-Hei Sung; Jonathan J Fong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Review of diseases and health management in zebrafish Danio rerio (Hamilton 1822) in research facilities.

Authors:  M L Kent; J L Sanders; S Spagnoli; C E Al-Samarrie; K N Murray
Journal:  J Fish Dis       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.767

9.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals and unpacks a biodiversity conservation paradox in Mediterranean marine reserves.

Authors:  Emilie Boulanger; Nicolas Loiseau; Alice Valentini; Véronique Arnal; Pierre Boissery; Tony Dejean; Julie Deter; Nacim Guellati; Florian Holon; Jean-Baptiste Juhel; Philippe Lenfant; Stéphanie Manel; David Mouillot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks.

Authors:  Lu Shu; Arne Ludwig; Zuogang Peng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.