| Literature DB >> 26479867 |
Alice Valentini1, Pierre Taberlet2,3, Claude Miaud4, Raphaël Civade5, Jelger Herder6, Philip Francis Thomsen7, Eva Bellemain1, Aurélien Besnard4, Eric Coissac2,3, Frédéric Boyer2,3, Coline Gaboriaud1, Pauline Jean1, Nicolas Poulet8, Nicolas Roset9, Gordon H Copp10,11, Philippe Geniez4, Didier Pont5, Christine Argillier12, Jean-Marc Baudoin12, Tiphaine Peroux12, Alain J Crivelli13, Anthony Olivier13, Manon Acqueberge14, Matthieu Le Brun15, Peter R Møller16, Eske Willerslev7, Tony Dejean1.
Abstract
Global biodiversity in freshwater and the oceans is declining at high rates. Reliable tools for assessing and monitoring aquatic biodiversity, especially for rare and secretive species, are important for efficient and timely management. Recent advances in DNA sequencing have provided a new tool for species detection from DNA present in the environment. In this study, we tested whether an environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach, using water samples, can be used for addressing significant questions in ecology and conservation. Two key aquatic vertebrate groups were targeted: amphibians and bony fish. The reliability of this method was cautiously validated in silico, in vitro and in situ. When compared with traditional surveys or historical data, eDNA metabarcoding showed a much better detection probability overall. For amphibians, the detection probability with eDNA metabarcoding was 0.97 (CI = 0.90-0.99) vs. 0.58 (CI = 0.50-0.63) for traditional surveys. For fish, in 89% of the studied sites, the number of taxa detected using the eDNA metabarcoding approach was higher or identical to the number detected using traditional methods. We argue that the proposed DNA-based approach has the potential to become the next-generation tool for ecological studies and standardized biodiversity monitoring in a wide range of aquatic ecosystems.Keywords: amphibian; detection probability; environmental DNA; fish; monitoring; wildlife management
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26479867 DOI: 10.1111/mec.13428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ecol ISSN: 0962-1083 Impact factor: 6.185