| Literature DB >> 36175452 |
Nicolas Morando1, Eliška Vrbová2, Asunta Melgar3, Roberto Daniel Rabinovich1, David Šmajs2, María A Pando4.
Abstract
Globally, 94% of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum (TPA) clinical strains belong to the SS14-like group and 6% to the Nichols-like group, with a prevalence of macrolide resistance of 90%. Our goal was to determine whether local TPA strain distribution and macrolide resistance frequency have changed significantly since our last report, which revealed that Buenos Aires had a high frequency of Nichols-like strains (27%) and low levels of macrolide resistance (14%). Swab samples from patients with suspected syphilis were collected during 2015-2019 and loci TP0136, TP0548, TP0705 were sequenced in order to perform multilocus sequence typing. Strains were classified as Nichols-like or SS14-like. The presence of macrolide resistance-associated mutations was determined by examination of the 23S rDNA gene sequence. Of 46 typeable samples, 37% were classified as Nichols-like and 63% as SS14-like. Macrolide resistance prevalence was 45.7%. Seven allelic profiles were found, five were SS14-like and two were Nichols-like. The frequency of Nichols-like strains increased between studies (26.8% vs. 37%, p = 0.36). A dramatic increase was found in the frequency of macrolide resistant strains between studies (14.3% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.005). Our results are in agreement with international trends and underscore the need to pursue further TPA molecular typing studies in South America.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36175452 PMCID: PMC9522787 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20410-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Flow chart of samples collected and analyzed in this study.
Characteristics of 57 syphilis-positive patients with successful DNA isolation enrolled in this study during 2015–2019 in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| Clinical characteristics of patients | All patients (n = 57)a | Patients with PCR-positive samples (n = 46)a | Patients with PCR-negative samples (n = 11)a |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, n (%) | M 47 (82.5); W 10 (17.5) | M 37 (80.4); W 9 (19.6) | M 10 (90.9); W 1 (9.1) |
| Median age (men/women) | 25 (16–69) / 27 (18–35) | 25 (16–59) / 26 (18–35) | 29 (16–69) / 27 |
| HIV positiveb, n (%) | 10/22 (45.5) | 9/20 (45) | 1/2 (50) |
| DFMc (%) | 10 P (17.5); 38 N (66.7); 9 n.d. (15.8) | 9 P (19.6); 31 N (67.4); 6 n.d. (13.0) | 1 P (9.1); 7 N (63.6); 3 n.d. (27.3) |
| FTA-ABS/TPHAd (%) | 20 P (35.1); 37 N/n.d. (64.9) | 17 P (37); 29 N/n.d. (63) | 3 P (27.3); 8 N/n.d. (72.7) |
| VDRL (%) | 47 P (82.5); 9 N (15.8); 1 n.d. (1.8) | 37 P (80.4); 8 N (17.4); 1 n.d. (2.2) | 10 P (90.9); 1 N (9.1); 0 n.d. (0) |
| ≥ 1:32 | 37 (64.9) | 29 (63) | 9 (81.8) |
| Primary | 13 (22.8) | 12 (26.1) | 1 (9.1) |
| Secondary | 16 (28.1) | 14 (30.4) | 2 (18.2) |
| Undetermined | 28 (49.1) | 20 (43.5) | 8 (72.7) |
aM men, W women, P positive, N negative, n.d. not determined.
bHIV status was known only in 22 patients (38.6%).
cDFM, dark-field microscopy.
dFTA-ABS Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption, TPHA Treponema pallidum Particle Hemagglutination Assay.
MLST allelic profiles for 34 fully typed and 12 partially typed lesion swab samples from patients attending a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Buenos Aires, 2015–2019.
| Sequence typea | Allelic profileb | Typing | 23S rDNAc (no. of samples) | Genetic group | No. of samples (%)d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 9.7.3 | Complete | S(7)/R8(2)/X(3) | Nichols | 12 (26.1) |
| 2 | 1.1.1 | Complete | S(6)/R8(2)/X(1) | SS14 | 9 (19.6) |
| 1 | 1.3.1 | Complete | S(1)/R8(8) | SS14 | 9 (19.6) |
| 31 | 9.20.3 | Complete | R9 (1) | Nichols | 1 (2.2) |
| 3 | 1.1.8 | Complete | X(1) | SS14 | 1 (2.2) |
| 50 | 1.32.1 | Complete | R8(1) | SS14 | 1 (2.2) |
| 117e | 1.48.3e | Complete | S(1) | SS14 | 1 (2.2) |
| – | 1.X.1 | Partial | R8(1)/X(1) | SS14 | 2 (4.3) |
| – | 1.X.X | Partial | X(2) | SS14 | 2 (4.3) |
| – | 9.7.X | Partial | S(2) | Nichols | 2 (4.3) |
| – | X.1.1 | Partial | X(1) | SS14 | 1 (2.2) |
| – | X.1.3 | Partial | S(1) | SS14 | 1 (2.2) |
| – | X.3.1 | Partial | R8(1) | SS14 | 1 (2.2) |
| – | X.3.X | Partial | X(1) | SS14 | 1 (2.2) |
| – | 9.20.X | Partial | S(1) | Nichols | 1 (2.2) |
| – | 9.X.X | Partial | X(1) | Nichols | 1 (2.2) |
aAccording to the PubMLST database of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum[15].
bAllelic profiles are based on a three-number code: the first number corresponds to the allelic variant in the TP0136 locus, the second corresponds to the allelic variant in the TP0548 locus and the third corresponds to the allelic variant in the TP0705 locus. We used X to denote that the allelic variant was not determined.
cS no mutation in 23S rDNA (sensitive), R8 A2058G mutation in 23S rDNA (resistance), R9 A2059G mutation in 23S rDNA (resistance), X not determined. The frequency (number) of each case is given in parenthesis.
dPercentages calculated over the total number of typed samples (no. of fully typed samples + no. of partially typed samples).
eNewly identified allelic profile, with alleles known from previous studies.
Figure 2Majority rule consensus tree of 1000 bootstrap replicates performed on concatenated TP0136, TP0548 and TP0705 sequences identified among fully typed samples. Bootstrap percentages given for clades recovered with more than 50% support. The scale shows the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values are shown next to branches. The length of concatenated sequences was 1901 bp and contained 44 variable positions. The tree was constructed in MEGA X[52] using the Maximum Likelihood method[54] with the bootstrap test[55].
Comparison of reported TPA allelic profile frequencies between this study and studies conducted in other continents.
| 1.3.1 | 1.1.1 | 9.7.3 | 1.1.8 | 9.20.3 | 1.32.1 | 1.48.3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argentina (this study) (%) | 26.5 | 26.5 | 35.3 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| Europea (%) | 48.9 | 15.1 | 4.4 | 7.7 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0 |
| North Americaa (%) | 60 | 9.6 | 2.2 | 0.74 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asiaa (%) | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 75.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Totala (%) | 44.2 | 12.8 | 3.5 | 15.9 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0 |
aData according to the PubMLST database[15]. Only the frequencies of fully typed strains were used for calculations.
Comparison of clade and macrolide resistance frequencies between studies.
| Gallo Vaulet ML, 2017 | This study | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SS14 | 73.2% (30/41) | 63% (29/46) | |
| Nichols | 26.8% (11/41) | 37% (17/46) | 0.36 |
| All | 14.3% (6/42) | 45.7% (16/35) | |
| SS14 | 16.7% (5/30) | 59.1% (13/22) | |
| Nichols | 9.1% (1/11) | 23.1% (3/13) | 0.60 |
Significant values are in bold.