Literature DB >> 36173380

Quality assessment in light microscopy for routine use through simple tools and robust metrics.

Orestis Faklaris1, Leslie Bancel-Vallée1, Aurélien Dauphin2, Baptiste Monterroso3, Perrine Frère4, David Geny5, Tudor Manoliu6, Sylvain de Rossi1, Fabrice P Cordelières7, Damien Schapman8, Roland Nitschke9, Julien Cau1, Thomas Guilbert10.   

Abstract

Although there is a need to demonstrate reproducibility in light microscopy acquisitions, the lack of standardized guidelines monitoring microscope health status over time has so far impaired the widespread use of quality control (QC) measurements. As scientists from 10 imaging core facilities who encounter various types of projects, we provide affordable hardware and open source software tools, rigorous protocols, and define reference values to assess QC metrics for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities. Seven protocols specify metrics on the microscope resolution, field illumination flatness, chromatic aberrations, illumination power stability, stage drift, positioning repeatability, and spatial-temporal noise of camera sensors. We designed the MetroloJ_QC ImageJ/Fiji Java plugin to incorporate the metrics and automate analysis. Measurements allow us to propose an extensive characterization of the QC procedures that can be used by any seasoned microscope user, from research biologists with a specialized interest in fluorescence light microscopy through to core facility staff, to ensure reproducible and quantifiable microscopy results.
© 2022 Faklaris et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36173380      PMCID: PMC9526251          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202107093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   8.077


  64 in total

1.  Quality assessment of confocal microscopy slide-based systems: instability.

Authors:  Robert M Zucker
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Reliability of confocal microscopy spectral imaging systems: use of multispectral beads.

Authors:  Robert M Zucker; Paul Rigby; Ian Clements; Wendy Salmon; Michael Chua
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Evaluating confocal microscopy system performance.

Authors:  Robert M Zucker
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

4.  A Quantitative Measure of Field Illumination.

Authors:  Claire M Brown; Andrew Reilly; Richard W Cole
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2015-07

5.  sCMOS noise-correction algorithm for microscopy images.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Michael J Mlodzianoski; Zhenhua Hu; Yuan Ren; Kristi McElmurry; Daniel M Suter; Fang Huang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The making of microscope camera standards.

Authors:  Vivien Marx
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 47.990

8.  ConfocalCheck--a software tool for the automated monitoring of confocal microscope performance.

Authors:  Keng Imm Hng; Dirk Dormann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods.

Authors:  Paula Montero Llopis; Rebecca A Senft; Tim J Ross-Elliott; Ryan Stephansky; Daniel P Keeley; Preman Koshar; Guillermo Marqués; Ya-Sheng Gao; Benjamin R Carlson; Thomas Pengo; Mark A Sanders; Lisa A Cameron; Michelle S Itano
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  QUAREP-LiMi: a community endeavor to advance quality assessment and reproducibility in light microscopy.

Authors:  Ulrike Boehm; Glyn Nelson; Claire M Brown; Steve Bagley; Peter Bajcsy; Johanna Bischof; Aurelien Dauphin; Ian M Dobbie; John E Eriksson; Orestis Faklaris; Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez; Alexia Ferrand; Laurent Gelman; Ali Gheisari; Hella Hartmann; Christian Kukat; Alex Laude; Miso Mitkovski; Sebastian Munck; Alison J North; Tobias M Rasse; Ute Resch-Genger; Lucas C Schuetz; Arne Seitz; Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia; Jason R Swedlow; Roland Nitschke
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 47.990

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.