| Literature DB >> 36173380 |
Orestis Faklaris1, Leslie Bancel-Vallée1, Aurélien Dauphin2, Baptiste Monterroso3, Perrine Frère4, David Geny5, Tudor Manoliu6, Sylvain de Rossi1, Fabrice P Cordelières7, Damien Schapman8, Roland Nitschke9, Julien Cau1, Thomas Guilbert10.
Abstract
Although there is a need to demonstrate reproducibility in light microscopy acquisitions, the lack of standardized guidelines monitoring microscope health status over time has so far impaired the widespread use of quality control (QC) measurements. As scientists from 10 imaging core facilities who encounter various types of projects, we provide affordable hardware and open source software tools, rigorous protocols, and define reference values to assess QC metrics for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities. Seven protocols specify metrics on the microscope resolution, field illumination flatness, chromatic aberrations, illumination power stability, stage drift, positioning repeatability, and spatial-temporal noise of camera sensors. We designed the MetroloJ_QC ImageJ/Fiji Java plugin to incorporate the metrics and automate analysis. Measurements allow us to propose an extensive characterization of the QC procedures that can be used by any seasoned microscope user, from research biologists with a specialized interest in fluorescence light microscopy through to core facility staff, to ensure reproducible and quantifiable microscopy results.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36173380 PMCID: PMC9526251 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202107093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Biol ISSN: 0021-9525 Impact factor: 8.077