Literature DB >> 24052361

Evaluating confocal microscopy system performance.

Robert M Zucker1.   

Abstract

A confocal microscope was evaluated with a series of tests that measure field illumination, lens clarity, laser power, laser stability, dichroic functionality, spectral registration, axial resolution, scanning stability, PMT quality, overall machine stability, and system noise. These tests will help investigators measure various parameters on their confocal microscopes to insure that they are working correctly with the necessary resolution, sensitivity, and precision. Utilization of this proposed testing approach will help eliminate some of the subjectivity currently employed in assessing the CLSM performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24052361     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-847-8_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  3 in total

1.  Quality assessment in light microscopy for routine use through simple tools and robust metrics.

Authors:  Orestis Faklaris; Leslie Bancel-Vallée; Aurélien Dauphin; Baptiste Monterroso; Perrine Frère; David Geny; Tudor Manoliu; Sylvain de Rossi; Fabrice P Cordelières; Damien Schapman; Roland Nitschke; Julien Cau; Thomas Guilbert
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.077

2.  IntensityCheck - The light measuring app for microscope performance checks and consistent fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Dirk Dormann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Optimization of Advanced Live-Cell Imaging through Red/Near-Infrared Dye Labeling and Fluorescence Lifetime-Based Strategies.

Authors:  Magalie Bénard; Damien Schapman; Christophe Chamot; Fatéméh Dubois; Guénaëlle Levallet; Hitoshi Komuro; Ludovic Galas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.